Search This Blog

Sunday, December 29, 2013

On the Rehabilitation of Alan Turing

On the Rehabilitation of Alan Turing

By Barry Sheppard
December 28. 2013

On Christmas Eve the Queen of England, Scotland, Wales, Northern
Ireland, and the Commonwealth deigned to pardon one of the twentieth
century's most important mathematicians of the crime of homosexuality.

In 1952 Alan Turing was tried and convicted of engaging in sex with
other men. He was then presented with the choice of prison or chemical
castration. He chose the latter, estrogen treatments that caused him to
grow breasts, made him impotent, and sent him into depression. He was
fired from his job with the British government. Washington barred him
from entering the United States, which he had often visited to work with
mathematicians in Bell Labs.

In 1954 he ate an apple laced with cyanide, which was ruled a suicide.

He was 41 years old.

In 1936 Turing developed a model of the "universal computing machine," a
concept which lies behind all computers. Other subsequent mathematical
models of computers have been found to be equivalent to what has become
known as the "Turing machine."

Besides this accomplishment, Turing broke the German enigma code in the
Second World War, and proved two important mathematical theorems, and
other work.

The law under which Turing was convicted was repealed in 1967. But in
the years since, attempts to have him pardoned were repeatedly rebuffed.
The most recent was last year, 50 years after his conviction, when
Parliament voted down a motion to pardon him.

The reasoning of the majority of this most august body was that since
the law was the law in 1952, and Turing had knowingly violated it, he
was a lawbreaker and lawbreakers cannot be pardoned. This decision
provoked an immediate response, when 10,000 signed a petition that
Turing be put on the new 10-pound note.

There was international outrage in addition. All this led to the Queen's
pardon this year. The wording of the pardon itself is disgusting: "Now
Know Ye: that We, in consideration of circumstances humbly represented
unto Us, are Graciously pleased to extend Our Grace and Mercy unto the
said Alan Mathison Turing and to grant him Our Free Pardon posthumously
in respect of said convictions."

The "We" and "Us" and "Our" refer to the Queen's double personhood, as
both the physical person Elizabeth II and as the embodiment of the "body
politic," which is immutable and "utterly void of Infancy and Old Age."
It's something like the Pope's "We," which refers to him and God.

But Turning does not need forgiving because he did nothing wrong. If any
entity requires being extended Grace and Mercy it is the UK government
for its crime against Turing, which arguably directly led to his death.

Turing was pardoned because of his fame and accomplishments. But some
75,000 men were convicted under the same law as Turing, of whom 26,000
are still alive. Turing's pardon should be extended to the 75,000, and
would improve the lives of the 26,000 today.

A final thought -- those reading this are doing so on a "Turing machine."

[humor] 50 Shades of Golf ... or was that Grey?

Four guys have been going to the same golfing trip to the Caribbean for many years.
  
Two days before the group is to leave, Jack's wife puts her foot down and  tells him he isn't going.  Jack's mates are very upset that he can't go, but what can they do.
  
Two days later, the three get to the Caribbean only to find Jack sitting at the beach with a tent set up, firewood gathered, dinner cooking on the fire, and sitting having a cold beer.
                                                              
'Bloody hell Jack, how long you been here, and how did you talk your missus into letting you go?'
                                                              
'Well, I've been here since last night. 

'Yesterday evening, I was sitting in my living room chair and my wife came  up behind me and put her hands over my eyes and asked,  'Guess  who?' I pulled her hands off, and there she was, wearing a nightie.

'She took my hand and pulled me into our bedroom. The room had candles and rose petals all over. Well she's been reading 50 Shades of Gray ...
  
'On the bed she had handcuffs, and ropes!  She told me to tie her up and cuff her to the bed, so I did. 
                                                                
'And then she said, 'Do whatever you want.' 
                                                                
'So, Here I am!'

>:-} 

Israel’s recurring use of terror on civilians

Israel’s recurring use of terror on civilians

by aletho
1755_554366081258774_621457260_n
By Bob Finch | January 26, 2009
Insanely disproportionate use of violence against unarmed civilians
“The stated aim was, as always, to stop the launching of the rockets. The means: killing a maximum of Palestinians, in order to teach them a lesson. The decision was based on the traditional Israeli concept: hit the civilian population again and again, until it overthrows its leaders. This has been tried hundreds of times and has failed hundreds of times.” (Uri Avnery “Kill a Hundred Turks and Rest”: The Five-Day War in Gaza March 2008).
Operation Grapes of Wrath ~ Lebanon, in 1996
“Ehud Barak will be remembered in Israel’s history as the one who introduced the abuse of innocent civilians as political cards. Barak was probably not the first Israeli warrior to abuse civilians on a tactical level, but he was the one who turned it into a central Israeli strategy. Operation Grapes of Wrath in Lebanon, in 1996, with Barak as an influential cabinet member, openly targeted civilians, turning them into refugees to make them put pressure on Beirut’s government. The recent siege on Gaza follows a similar logic: put pressure on civilians to achieve political goals. (A clear war crime, it goes without saying.)” (Ran HaCohen ‘Israel Says ‘No’’ Feb. 2008).
Israelis fire 1,300,000 bullets during first few days of Intifada
“Malka, in an interview with the Israeli paper Ha’aretz on 14 June, revealed that during the first few days of the intifada, Israeli occupation soldiers fired 1,300,000 bullets on Palestinian population centres and other targets. This massive firepower, which had no operational justification given the Palestinians’ inherently inferior firepower (they possessed only light firearms and in limited numbers), showed that the Israeli army was interested more in decimating and harming the Palestinians and less in ending the violence. According to Israeli sources, then-Chief of Staff and now Defence Minister Shaul Mofaz didn’t plan to bring about the end of the conflict. Instead, he thought he had finally seized the opportunity to “beat and vanquish” the Palestinians in order to “burn into their consciousness” and make them “internalise their weakness and inferiority vis-a-vis Israel’s strength”. Mofaz’s ultimate aim, of which he later convinced Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, was to hector Palestinians into negotiations in a weakened and exhausted state whereby they would have no choice but to accept Israel’s dictates and demands. The new revelations, Palestinian officials argue, prove that the escalation of violence during the first few months of the intifada was, first and foremost, Israel’s responsibility. “This is what we have been saying all along that this is not about Israeli security but rather about Israel’s terrorising the Palestinian people for the purpose of arrogating their land and rights. Israel is now admitting that,” said Michael Tarazi, adviser to Palestinian Authority leader Yasir Arafat.” (Khalid Amayreh ‘The second intifada, an Israeli strategy’ July 2004).
Lebanon 2006
“This intentional and coldly calculated Israeli policy of targeting innocent Lebanese civilians and civilian infrastructure stems from a time-honoured, but hardly ever successful, Israeli doctrine of applying intense “pressure” against a civilian population in order to compel them, in-turn, to pressure the resistance into submitting to Israeli dictates, thereby doing Israel’s bidding by proxy. It has been consistently used against the Palestinians ever since the Nakba of 1948, and is still applied now in the ongoing barbaric offensive and hermetic siege against Gaza. Israel may have plagiarized this doctrine from the legacies of previous oppressors, but it has refined it to a degree that it no longer raises any moral qualms in most of Israeli society, where it is widely accepted by the public as a right, even a duty in the fight for Israel’s “security.” (Omar Barghouti ‘The Massacre at Qana’ August 01 2006); “As Limor and Shelah reveal, in spite of the fact that the conflict on the ground took place on a very narrow strip of land (the Israeli border on the south and Litani River on the north), the Israeli artillery had managed to shoot over 170,000 shells. In comparison, in the 1973 war while fighting against two strong state armies over two very large fronts, the Israelis had launched only 53,000 shells. The figures relating to the Air Force are even more striking. Though less than a few concrete targets were available for the IDF intelligence, the IAF (Israeli Air Force) had launched as many as 17,550 combat missions, this translates into 520 missions a day, almost as many as in the 1973 war (605 a day). Yet, in 1973 the IAF was fighting two well-equipped air forces, it was engaged in a fair amount of air-to-air combat and a relentless struggle against the latest Soviet ground-to-air missiles. None of that happened in the Second Lebanon War. The IAF was engaged solely in hammering the Lebanese soil. It literally threw and launched everything it had in its disposal, presenting a merciless method that in places (southern Beirut for instance), had a similar effect to the infamous 1940s Anglo-American carpet bombardment.” (Gilad Atzmon ‘Saying NO to the Hunters of Goliath’ August 13, 2007); “That was on Aug. 30, by which time U.N. teams had identified 359 separate cluster-bomb sites. Since then, the true dimensions of the problem have become even clearer: 770 cluster-bomb sites have now been identified. And the current U.N. estimate is that Israel dropped between 2 million and 3 million bomblets on Lebanon, of which up to a million have yet to explode.” (Saree Makdisi ‘Israel’s Cluster Bomb War’ Oct. 2006).
Related articles
aletho

‘Blood Diamonds’ and Israel’s Diamond Export Industry

‘Blood Diamonds’ and Israel’s Diamond Export Industry

by aletho
'Boycott Israeli blood diamond.' (Photo: supplied)
By Sean Clinton | Palestine Chronicle | December 28, 2013
In November, members of the Kimberley Process (KP), meeting in plenary in South Africa, squandered what was probably their last good opportunity to ban the sale of all blood diamonds, including cut and polished blood diamonds which are an important source of funding for the nuclear armed regime in Israel which stands accused of the crime of apartheid, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The governments with a vested interest in the diamond industry, that set up and control the KP, failed to amend the definition of a “conflict diamond” which is restricted to “rough diamonds used by rebel movements or their allies to finance conflict aimed at undermining legitimate governments”. All other diamonds associated with human rights violations evade the KP regulations.
The failure was well flagged in advance as key stakeholders, including South Africa which chaired the KP in 2013, had voiced opposition to reforms that would broaden the remit of the KP to embargo diamonds associated with human rights violations by government forces.
Some jewelers refuse to sell diamonds sourced in the Marange area of Zimbabwe where government forces are reported to have killed 200 miners. However, most if not all, of the worlds leading jewelers sell diamonds processed in Israel where the industry generates about $1 billion annually for the Israeli military which is guilty of grievous human rights violations in Palestine .
With the KP chair passed to China for 2014, and Angola in line for 2015, no one believes they will implement the changes necessary to ban the trade in all blood diamonds.
Corporate Posturing
Corporate social responsibility statements – the moral beacons of wannabe ethically progressive companies – amount to little more than window-dressing unless they are supported by rigorous enforcement. No amount of charitable support for a company’s favorite worthy causes can mitigate, directly or indirectly, providing a revenue stream for rogue regimes guilty of gross human rights violations.
Anglo American plc owns 85% of De Beers making it one of the worlds leading diamond companies with interests at all stages of the supply pipe from mining to retail. De Beers promote their own “Forevermark” diamonds many of which are crafted in Israel .  Their promotional literature claims “Forevermark is committed to upholding the highest business, social and environmental standards and practices across its and its partners businesses”.
Anglo American’s Sustainable Development Policy  stipulates that suppliers are expected to uphold “fundamental human rights and fair labour practices, in line with internationally recognized standards”. Suppliers must also “oppose corruption, bribery, fraud…. and must not tolerate any form of money laundering or participate in other illegal incentives in business”.
Despite this, De Beers continues to sell diamonds crafted in Israel even though the Israeli diamond industry is notorious for discrimination in the workplace against non-Jews – a fact confirmed by data from the Israeli Bureau of Statistics and a recent government-funded initiative to encourage ultra-Orthodox Jews to take up employment in the diamond industry without a similar initiative for non-Jews.  Furthermore, although authorities uncovered the “world’s largest illegal bank”, involving fraudulent trading worth billions of shekels, in the Israeli Diamond Exchange in 2012, Anglo American continues trading with Israeli diamond companies.
Anglo American’s failure to abide by their own standards exposes their hypocrisy – a double-standard that permeates the jewellery industry when it comes to blood diamonds from Israel .
The Steinmetz Diamond Group, one of Tiffany’s biggest suppliers and a “unique partner” of Sotheby’s Diamonds, through the Steinmetz Foundation, funds and supports a Unit of the Givati Brigade of the Israeli military. The Givati Brigade is guilty of the massacre of at least 21 members of the Samouni family in Gaza – a war crime documented by the UNHRC and other human rights organizations.
Other world-leading jewelers including Harry Winston, Cartier, Ritani, Blue Nile, Zales, Brilliant Earth, Graff Diamonds, Chow Tai Fook, Chopard and many more, sell diamonds from Israel which are tarnished with Palestinian blood – one of the most recent victim being a 15 year old child, Wajih Wajdi al-Ramahi, shot in the back and killed by the Givati Brigade on 7th December.  He was the 26th Palestinian to be killed by the Israeli military this year.
The imperative for all businesses to respect human rights and ensure their business relationships are not contributing to adverse human rights impacts is a well established tenet affirmed in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the UN Global Compact, and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.  The fact that the diamond industry, which accounted for 31.2% of Israel ’s manufacturing exports in 2011, is a very significant source of revenue for the regime in Israel means jewelers that sell diamonds processed in Israel help fund the commission of war crimes and suspected crimes against humanity.
Shareholders of companies that sell diamonds linked to atrocities and bloodshed are exposed to financial and legal hazard.  The fraudulent misrepresentation of such diamonds as conflict-free leaves jewelers open to challenge by patrons angered by the fact that diamonds they purchased in good faith are de-facto blood diamonds. Companies complicit in human rights violations may be liable for reparations, which, in the case of victims of Israeli violence in Palestine , could amount to billions of dollars.
Despite Israel ’s record as a serial human rights offender and it’s nuclear weapons stockpile which it refuses to submit to international regulation, the leaders of the global diamond industry continue to give Israel refuge in the KP tent.
Consumer Power
If consumers are to have confidence in the ethical credentials of diamonds civil society needs to regain the initiative. This can be done by putting the jewellery industry under the spotlight and demanding that jewelers guarantee the diamonds they sell are not a source of funding for, or in any way associated with, serious human rights violations – i.e. they are not blood diamonds.
As cut and polished blood diamonds from Israel legally enter the diamond market in vast quantities (50% of the US market), diamond buyers should demand to know where a diamond was sourced, cut and polished if they want to avoid buying a blood diamond.
Diamond buyers should not allow jewelers to fob them off with assurances about “conflict diamonds” – the sacrificial offering which only encompasses rough diamonds that fund rebel violence against legitimate governments. This distracts from, and blinds consumers to, the extensive trade in cut and polished blood diamonds which continues unchecked and largely unreported by media.
“Ethically sourced” are some of the buzz words hammered into the conscience of diamond buyers.  Rough diamonds at source represent but a small fraction of the value of the cut and polished diamonds sold by jewelers. Ethically sourced diamonds can still be blood diamonds if revenue they generate after sourcing is used to fund human rights violations. “The “ethically sourced” pitch is a scam – it offers zero protection from blood diamonds.
Another example of the duplicity of the jewellery industry is the widespread abuse of the term conflict-free. This is part of a bogus System of Warranties introduced by the World Diamond Council which allows sellers to self-certify diamonds as conflict-free based on the fact that they are in compliance with the discredited Kimberley Process which gives legal cover to blood diamonds that fund government forces.
Related article
aletho

True Colors Residence

True Colors Residence

True Colors ResidenceTrue Colors Residence (TCR), a project of West End and partners Grammy-award winning artist Cyndi Lauper and her manager, longtime WIR volunteer Lisa Barbaris, builds upon West End’s history of pioneering new models to serve the most underserved and vulnerable New Yorkers.  TCR is New York’s first and only permanent, supportive housing for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth with a history of homelessness. This profoundly underserved population is estimated to make up nearly 40% of homeless youth in New York City.
Opened in September 2011, TCR provides young, formerly homeless LGBT individuals aged 18-24 upon admission, a safe, stable and supportive environment in which they can rebuild their lives. Residents are responsible for paying affordable rent based on their income. TCR houses 30 studio apartments, each equipped with a kitchen and bathroom. Residents also have access to shared indoor and outdoor community space, a computer lounge, a small library, and laundry facilities.
Residents receive case management and ongoing assistance with every aspect of independent living as well as obtaining employment best suited to their individual interests and skills. Comprehensive support services, available on a purely voluntary basis and tailored to each individual, include: benefits and entitlement advocacy, counseling, HIV/AIDS counseling and education, medication management, job readiness and placement assistance and help with such practical details as cooking, money management, health issues and other independent living skills.  A range of additional services, including GED classes and healthcare, are available through linkages with other nonprofit agencies.
Residents are referred to TCR by the New York City Department of Homeless Services, Department of Youth and Community Development, and local community-based organizations.

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Facebook Targets “Have A Gay Day” Facebook Page Over Same-Sex Kiss

Facebook Targets “Have A Gay Day” Facebook Page Over Same-Sex Kiss

by Simone Sanner
Friday evening the 100 plus admins of equal rights Facebook page "Have A Gay Day" were banned for posting a picture of two men kissing, and immediately logged out of Facebook on their phones and other devices as well.
The caption to the picture read "Did this picture offend you? Did you ever think, that your opinion might be offensive?"
Site admins then released a statement, stating that the same picture, a close-up of two stubbled faces kissing, has been used in the past, specifically six months ago, without issue.
They had this to say:
"We posted a photo of two men sharing a kiss. The only thing visible was lips touching. The quote on the photo read, did this picture offend you? Did you ever think, maybe your opinion is offensive? We had posted this photo in the past with no issue and the last time we posted this photo was actually six months ago.
All 106 admins of this page were kicked off of Facebook and logged out of their mobile apps and computer access. When logging back into Facebook we were told that this photo was found to be against the Community Standards for Facebook. We have reviewed the standards and feel that Facebook is in error. Many of us have received account blocks and locks from myself a 30 day ban to some with 15 day bans and yet others with only a few hours.
There is currently no way to appeal this decision. In the past Facebook has apologized to LGBT pages that had photos removed of couples kissing and restored their accounts. We are asking that Facebook wipe this accusation of being against their community standard from our record and restore our power to post on our personal pages and fan pages. This is truly uncalled for.
We have enabled back up Facebook accounts so we have the ability to still post. We ask that Facebook review their decision and promptly restore us as a page, our personal accounts and issue an apology as well as working to make sure this doesn't occur again.
We will do everything in our power to bring this to Facebooks attention as quickly as possible.
If you are a member of the media or Facebook our inbox is always open for interaction. Thank you.
Michael
Have A Gay Day"
There is no way to appeal such a decision even though Facebook previously has apologized for such bannings and restored admins' ability to post.
The group is asking Facebook to restore the page and issue them an apology.
Simone Sanner

Catholic Youth Leader Sexually Abuses Another Girl After Promising First Victim He’ll Never Do it Again if She Keeps Quiet

Catholic Youth Leader Sexually Abuses Another Girl After Promising First Victim He’ll Never Do it Again if She Keeps Quiet

by Howard Crane
A Catholic youth leader was reported to the police after sexually assaulting multiple victims. The complaint filed by Marain Foley claimed that Catholic youth leader Brandon Eckerson raped her just days before Christmas of 2012. Though, Eckerson influenced her to “not to say anything further to anyone about his sexual exploitation of her; in exchange he promised to never again sexually assault anyone. It was understood that if plaintiff discovered he violated this sworn promise she would go to the police.”
According to Foley, Eckerson’s extreme behavior extends well beyond just sexual assault, such as bringing a group of minors to bars and illegally purchasing them alcohol, as well as providing alcohol at youth group meetings.
But Foley has no plans on just stopping with the small potatoes. She is also filing a suit against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Phoenix, Bishop Thomas Olmsted, and Reverend Patrick Robertson because allegedly after she first reported to her doctor regarding the rape, “in compliance with state law [he] sent notice to Blessed Sacrament Parish, which circulated an email on the subject.” Foley wants to make sure that the church “knew that Brandon Eckerson was a danger,” “shared that concern with other members of Blessed Sacrament Parish and the Phoenix Diocese,” but failed to ever file a report with the police.
After Foley was informed that Eckerson had raped not only another member of the youth group, but her best friend, she deemed that as breaking a promise and decided to go to the police.

“Then, and only then,” the complaint reads, “did the Diocese terminate him.”


Howard Crane

NSA Whistleblower Confirms Fears Of Planned 'Police State' In America

NSA Whistleblower Confirms Fears Of Planned 'Police State' In America (video)

CONTRIBUTOR: Live Free or Die. Infowars reporter David Knight is joined by former NSA top official and whistleblower William Binney for a discussion about the planned 'police state' for America in an interview that should put an end to talk of this being only a 'conspiracy theory'. Americans on a massive scale must 'awaken' and...

New York Federal Judge: NSA Phone Surveillance Is Legal. Washington Dist. Judge “Almost Certainly” Violates Constitution - Quo Vadis?

New York Federal Judge: NSA Phone Surveillance Is Legal. Washington Dist. Judge “Almost Certainly” Violates Constitution - Quo Vadis?

New York Federal Judge: NSA Phone Surveillance Is Legal. Washington Dist. Judge “Almost Certainly” Violates Constitution - Quo Vadis? CONTRIBUTOR: Tom Dennen, the paranoid historian. A federal judge in New York ruled Friday that the National Security Agency's broad collection of U.S. phone-customer data is lawful, dismissing a complaint filed by the American Civil Liberties Union. The decision by U.S. District Judge William H. Pauley III came just days after another federal judge, U.S. District...

Watch the Entire Universe Happen in Under Four Minutes

Watch the Entire Universe Happen in Under Four Minutes (Video)

by Nick Goroff
When mired in the middle of debating the origins of the universe against those who would believe the Earth is a mere six-thousand years old, it can be easy to forget the majesty that is inherent to scientific theory.
And while we may not be made in the image of an almighty God, spawned from some original sin in a magical garden, the mere reality of us as a species being -at least as of this moment- the culmination of billions of years of progress, with elements forged in the hearts of stars, it can be just as easy to get swept up in it.
Throughout the long, long history of the universe, the growth and development of basic elements into heavier, more complex matter, then leading to planetary, ecological and biological evolution, ultimately leading to a review of the entire process by we, the universe's tiny little observers, plays like an ancient and epic tale of creation and reality.
Throughout the variety of philosophies proclaiming humanity to be a reflection of the universe itself, or alternately, the universe reflecting upon itself, the basic elements which make up our very physical form lend themselves nicely to these more secular ideas of the mystical nature of life in the universe.
So take a moment, let go of the mythology and surrounding debate and enjoy this short video depicting (in short order) the origins of atomic elemental structures and the reality of that which we often call "creation." And if nothing else, try to pause and smile at the relative insignificance and utter epic nature to existing in this universe we share.
Nick Goroff

Scientist admits faking HIV cure to get millions in grants


Scientist admits faking HIV cure to get millions in grants

National Institute of Health donated part of $19 million to bankroll the bogus findings of an Iowa professor
read more

Russian opera star, MP speaks out against anti-gay laws


Russian opera star, MP speaks out against anti-gay laws

Maria Maksakova said Russia has suffered extremely negative consequences – artists lose their jobs and sexual minorities are attacked
read more

Survey says 1 in 20 Chinese university students is gay


Survey says 1 in 20 Chinese university students is gay

Some 5.6% of respondents admit having been in a same-sex relationship
read more

Venezuelan government urged to offer asylum to gay Ugandans


Venezuelan government urged to offer asylum to gay Ugandans

LGBT organizations are petitioning the Venezuelan foreign office to offer political asylum to LGBT Ugandans facing imprisonment in their home country under new anti-gay law
read more

Free IVF available to gay couples in North Staffordshire

Free IVF available to gay couples in North Staffordshire

Same-sex partners in the UK region will be able to apply for NHS-funded fertility treatment for the first time under new rules
read more

12 Bible Quotes That CONDEMN Republicans As Millions Lose Unemployment Benefits

12 Bible Quotes That CONDEMN Republicans As Millions Lose Unemployment Benefits

by John Prager
Conservatives love Jesus, the Bible, and pretty much anything that they can twist to justify their hatred and bigotry. Unfortunately, their love for the Bible (or ability to read) does not extend to actually opening it. Thanks to the "family values" party's refusal to engage in bipartisan opposition to starvation, the Emergency Unemployment Compensation program has expired, taking away much-needed federal aid from over 1.3 million Americans--including the children right wingers demand must be born into the world and veterans conservatives support enthusiastically (until they come home, that is), and the elderly.
This "let 'em starve" mentality is justified in a number of ways in the alternate reality in which conservatives reside.  Most, however, choose the time-tested, tried and true ultimate liberator of guilt for just being a terrible person:  the Holy Bible and its totally, completely white mascot-- Jesus.
la-na-tt-attack-on-food-stamps-20131014-001
Bill O'Reilly, FOX News' bastion of truth, said that Jesus would not support food stamps. TEApublican blowhard Stephen Fincher, for example, laid down some Thessalonians on these moochers earlier this year, saying "The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat." Many Christians believe Jesus said this, but the quote was taken in a letter written by Paul to his church in Thessalonica to remind that if they did not help build the church, they would not be paid. Biblical scholars also believe the letter is a forgery written by someone pretending to be Paul.
lowe092113
Despite right wingers' certainty that Jesus is down with letting poor people starve, the Bible is not so sure about that. Had they actually read one, they would know this. After all, should one not understand that which he is shoving down another's throat?
Let's see how God feels about these moochers.
Deut. 15:7:[box type="shadow"] If there is a poor man among you, one of your brothers, in any of the towns of the land which the LORD your God is giving you, you shall not harden your heart, nor close your hand to your poor brother; but you shall freely open your hand to him, and generously lend him sufficient for his need in whatever he lacks.[/box]
Lev. 19:19[box type="shadow"] Now when you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap to the very corners of your field, neither shall you gather the gleanings of your harvest. Nor shall you glean your vineyard, nor shall you gather the fallen fruit of your vineyard; you shall leave them for the needy and for the stranger.[/box]
1 John 3:17[box type="shadow"] But if someone who is supposed to be a Christian has money enough to live well, and sees a brother in need, and won't help him--how can God's love be within him?[/box]
Prov. 14:31[box type="shadow"] Anyone who oppresses the poor is insulting God who made them. To help the poor is to honor God. Prov. 21:13 He who shuts his ears to the cries of the poor will be ignored in his own time of need.[/box]
Luke 3:11[box type="shadow"] "If you have two coats," he replied, "give one to the poor. If you have extra food, give it away to those who are hungry."[/box]
2 Cor. 9:9[box type="shadow"] It is as the Scriptures say: "The godly man gives generously to the poor. His good deeds will be an honor to him forever."[/box]
Isa. 58:7[box type="shadow"] I want you to share your food with the hungry and bring right into your own homes those who are helpless, poor, and destitute. Clothe those who are cold, and don't hide from relatives who need your help[/box]
Luke 6:20-21[box type="shadow"] Blessed are you who are poor, for yours in the kingdom of God. Blessed are you who hunger now, for you shall be satisfied. Blessed are you who weep now, for you shall laugh.[/box]
Prov. 22:9[box type="shadow"] He who is generous will be blessed, for he gives some of his food to the poor.[/box]
Ezek. 22:29,31[box type="shadow"] "The people of the land have practiced oppression and committed robbery, and they have wronged the poor and needy and have oppressed the sojourner without justice... Thus I have poured out My indignation on them; I have consumed them with the fire of My wrath; their way I have brought upon their heads," declares the Lord GOD.[/box]
James 5:1-6[box type="shadow"] Come now, you rich, weep and howl for your miseries which are coming upon you. Your riches have rotted and your garments have become moth-eaten. ...Behold, the pay of the laborers who mowed your fields, and with you have withheld, cries out against you; and the outcry of the harvesters has reached the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth. You have lived luxuriously on the earth and led a life of wanton pleasure; you have fattened your hearts in a day of slaughter.[/box]
images (5)
John Prager

All Utah Counties to Issue Marriage Licenses as Appeal Proceeds

All Utah Counties to Issue Marriage Licenses as Appeal Proceeds

The last four holdout counties in Utah will now issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, as the state continues to seek a stay — and, eventually, an overturn — of a judge's marriage equality ruling.

BY Trudy Ring

December 27 2013 12:41 PM ET

The last four Utah counties that had held off on issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples finally gave in Thursday.
Meanwhile, state officials are expected to ask the U.S. Supreme Court in the next few days for a stay of the ruling that allowed same-sex marriages to begin.
Officials in Box Elder, Utah, Plute, and San Juan counties decided Thursday to begin issuing licenses to gay couples, the Associated Press reports. They “had little choice” after a federal appeals court Tuesday refused to put a hold on U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby’s ruling for marriage equality, according to the AP. Shelby ruled last week that the state constitution’s ban on same-sex marriage violated couples’ rights under the U.S. Constitution.
Some counties with small populations have had no license applications from same-sex couples to date, but in larger counties pent-up demand from these couples has resulted in record numbers of licenses being issued, according to The Salt Lake Tribune.
The state plans to appeal Shelby’s ruling all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary, but first it is seeking a stay of it. The Utah attorney general’s office will “file with the Supreme Court as soon as possible,” according to a statement issued by that office, CNN reports.
The request will initially go to Justice Sonia Sotomayor because she has jurisdiction over Utah’s appeals, and she could either decide on the stay herself or ask the entire court to consider the matter. Legal experts said the latter is the more likely scenario, and probably a majority of justices will vote against the stay. “On the strictly legal argument, it’s hard to justify granting a stay,” Cornell University law professor Michael C. Dorf told The New York Times.
On the ruling itself, Utah is preparing an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. That court has agreed to expedite its consideration of the case. If Utah loses there, it is expected to take its appeal to the Supreme Court.
After last June’s landmark pro-marriage equality rulings in cases involving the Defense of Marriage Act and California’s Proposition 8, the high court justices may have thought they would not hear similar cases for a few years, the Times notes. But the rapid progress of marriage equality means the court will have no respite from the issue.
On whether the court will go beyond those rulings and find a federal constitutional right to marriage for same-sex couples, Dorf said, “It’s pretty clear that even the five justices who are sympathetic to same-sex marriage would rather take a few years before getting there. If their hand is forced, as it now will be, it’s impossible to say with certainty what they’ll do.”
But Harvard Law School historian Michael J. Klarman told the Times a Supreme Court ruling for nationwide marriage equality is not out of the question. “Somewhere between the next two and six years, the court will be ready to do it, assuming the composition of the court does not change,” he said.

In Speech From 2009, Phil Robertson Says Men Should Marry 15 and 16 Year-Old Girls

CAUGHT ON TAPE: In Speech From 2009, Phil Robertson Says Men Should Marry 15 and 16 Year-Old Girls

by Sky Palma

In addition to homophobia and bigotry towards African Americans, it looks like we can now add pedophilia to the list of Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson’s shortcomings.
Video has surfaced of Robertson giving a speech in 2009 at the Sportsmen's Ministry in Georgia, where he suggests that men should target 15-16 year-old girls for marriage -- because they’re basically over the hill at 20.
“Look, you wait ‘til they get to be twenty years-old and the only picking that's going to take place is your pocket. You got to marry these girls when they're about fifteen or sixteen and they'll pick your ducks.
Watch:
Sky Palma

Paul Ryan Attempts to ‘School’ Pope While Posturing for Presidential Run

Paul Ryan Attempts to ‘School’ Pope While Posturing for Presidential Run

by Simone Sanner
Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, posturing as the new face of Conservative compassion, sought to teach the Pope about politics this week, saying,  “The guy is from Argentina, they haven’t had real capitalism in Argentina.” Ryan went on, “They have crony capitalism in Argentina. They don’t have a true free enterprise system.”
The remarks are an attempt to explain to the Pope the difference between Argentina's economy and the economy of the United States - because we have no cronyism in the American economics landscape.
“What I love about the pope is he is triggering the exact kind of dialogue we ought to be having,” Ryan suggested. He added nothing about his own state's sickly state of fiscal health.
Some see Ryan's remarks as an attempt to associate himself with a "kinder, gentler" Conservatism, as the rift between Tea Party Conservatives and Reaganites continues to grow. Ryan, positioning himself at a distance from the Tea Party, appears to be courting the votes of moderates by inching his image a bit to the Left.
Ryan, an heretofore Tea Party darling, is not saying he will run for the 2016 election. He's also not saying he will not run. When asked he said, "“I’ve decided I will consider this later,” Ryan said in a November interview with the Des Moines Register. “Once I’m through with this term, then I’m going to give a hard look at it.” Ryan's new book, the presidential hopeful's roadmap for Conservatism,  tentatively titled "Where Do We Go From Here?" is due out sometime in 2014.
Simone Sanner

Life-expectancy for homeless (in Scotland): 39

Life-expectancy for homeless: 39
THE life-expectancy of people living rough on Scotland's streets is just 39, according to a survey by a ­homeless charity.

Video of Spanish police beating up women in peaceful protest goes viral

Video of Spanish police beating up women in peaceful protest goes viral
Posted: 28 Dec 2013 02:13 AM PST
A video of Spanish police violently beating up a group of women during a demonstration has gone viral. The women were protesting a draft bill that restricts the right to abort, only allowing the procedure in cases of rape and when there is a health risk. The video, released by the Periodismo Humano news site, following the protest on Friday, has taken YouTube by storm, racking up over 300,000 views over the weekend. The footage shows members of the activist group ‘We decide’ talking to officers after the protest. Shouting can be heard and then officers, seemingly unprovoked, knock down a number of women and beat them with their truncheons

Increasing Police Brutality: Americans Killed by Cops Now Outnumber Americans Killed in Iraq War

Increasing Police Brutality: Americans Killed by Cops Now Outnumber Americans Killed in Iraq War
Posted: 28 Dec 2013 02:17 AM PST
The increase in police brutality in this country is a frightening reality. In the last decade alone the number of people murdered by police has reached 5,000. The number of soldiers killed since the inception of the Iraq war, 4489. What went wrong? In the 19070’s SWAT teams were estimated to be used just a few hundred times per year, now we are looking at over 40,000 military style “knock and announce” police raids a year

Alaska Air’s Been Fuked! Cancellations Due To Fukushima Radiation Rather Than The Flu?

Alaska Air’s Been Fuked! Cancellations Due To Fukushima Radiation Rather Than The Flu?
Posted: 28 Dec 2013 02:45 AM PST
In light of recent cancellations of airline flights out of Alaska, Oregon and Washington state, was there another reason behind those cancellations besides what we have already been told? While the official word is that ‘the flu’ has struck Alaska Airlines crews, causing the cancellations of 24 flights, we have been informed that the real reason that crew members have called in sick has been due to fears of high levels of radiation in the air, as confirmed by this recent story that hot particles are now in the lungs of Americans, especially in Seattle, via an Interview with nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen of Fairewinds. That same story shared with us that helicopters conducted secret flights to do surveys of the amount of radiation in the air and adds credence to more secretive military flights that were conducted just days ago and shared below

Racist Texas Knockout Game Punk Suspect DENIED BAIL!

Racist Texas Knockout Game Punk Suspect DENIED BAIL! (Video)

by Simone Sanner
Conrad Barrett, the 27-year-old white man charged with allegedly hitting a 79-year-old black man in a game of "Knockout" has been denied bail. Prosecutors say the attack was racially motivated.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Frances Stacy, the judge who denied the bail, said Barrett is a flight risk and a danger to the community. George Parnham, the attorney representing Barrett, was not surprised. "We were expecting that decision," said Parnham.
The federal complaint against Barrett states he recorded the incident on his phone, looked for the "perfect" victim, calling his selection a derogatory racist term.

The victim, so far unidentified, was hospitalized for four days and had surgery to repair his broken jaw.
Knockout is not a new game, dating as far back as the 1970's, where victims are targeted by race for unprovoked, surprise attacks.
Barnett has been diagnosed as having bi-polar disorder, and is taking lithium in detention. Parnham said to Associated Press reporters Thursday “When you start peeling back the layers of the onion and look at the mindset behind the action you soon realize there's a mental issue." He also said he "feels horribly sympathetic" for the victim.
Simone Sanner

Class Claims Memphis Spoiled 15,000 Rape Kits

Class Claims Memphis Spoiled 15,000 Rape Kits
     MEMPHIS (CN) - Memphis did not bother to submit 15,000 rape evidence kits for testing, but merely threw them away or "caused the spoliation of the sexual assault kits," Jane Doe claims in a federal class action.
     Doe is an adult victim of rape and a resident of Memphis, she says in the lawsuit against the city.
     "Plaintiff and the putative class members are female individuals who reported sexual assaults to third parties, had bodily fluid samples removed from their bodies and placed within sexual assault evidence kits, and whose sexual assault kits were subsequently transported to the Memphis Police Department for testing, evidentiary and custodial purposes," the complaint states. "The City of Memphis failed to submit over 15,000 such sexual assault kits for further testing and caused the spoliation of the sexual assault kits, all of which resulted in damages to the plaintiff and the putative class, which constitutes a violation of the equal protection clauses of the Tennessee and United States Constitutions."
     Doe says she was raped at around 2 a.m. on March 30, 2001, by an intruder who kicked in a window of her home. She reported the rape to Memphis police that day, and was taken to a Rape Crisis Center for treatment and collection of evidence.
     "While at the Rape Crisis Center medical personnel took body fluid samples from Jane Doe and placed them into a Memphis Police Department Sexual Assault Evidence Kit," she says in the complaint.
     It continues: "An officer from the Memphis Police Department transported the Sexual Assault Evidence Kit to the Memphis Police Department ostensibly for testing and to be used as evidence against the intruder.
     "Over the next thirteen (13) years defendant City of Memphis never submitted plaintiff Doe's Sexual Assault Evidence Kit for testing.
     "Unknown to plaintiff Doe, the City of Memphis had a policy, practice and/or custom of discarding sexual assault evidence kits.
     "Unknown to Plaintiff Doe, the City of Memphis had a policy, practice and/or custom of failing to submit sexual assault evidence kits for testing:
     "Over fifteen thousand (15,000) Sexual Assault Evidence Kits went untested over a period of several decades."
     It goes without saying, though Doe says it, that a "disproportionate number" of the people whose rape tests were spoiled or trashed were women.
     She claims that the policy of discarding rape evidence kits "was ratified by multiple policymakers within the City of Memphis Police Department."
     She claims Memphis police failed to "affect an arrest of" Doe's home intruder and failed to "prevent future rapes by the intruder."
     She claims that the "defendant has a history of discriminating against females" and that the "defendant's conduct was motivated by gender."
     She seeks an injunction "restraining and prohibiting defendants from continuing its policy and/or custom of failing to test sexual assault evidence kits," declaratory judgment that city policy on handling of sexual assault evidence is unconstitutional, damages for civil rights violations, plus costs and attorney's fees.
     She is represented by Robert L.J. Spence Jr., with Spencewalk, of Memphis.

White Guy Charged With Hate Crime After ‘Knockout Game ‘Style Attack on Elderly Black Man

White Guy Charged With Hate Crime After ‘Knockout Game ‘Style Attack on Elderly Black Man

by John Prager
The phony "knockout game" that has been taking the sort of media popular with white nationalists by storm has encouraged a good amount of hatred toward African Americans. Those with no sense, whose desperation to inspire race-based hatred, have begun to classify random street assaults (which occur at a rate of more than one per minute nationwide) as some sort of "game." Normally, this label is applied to situations in which the victim is white and the perpetrator black -- because, of course, we all know only black folks are violent. Supposedly, in the "game," the assailant attempts to knock out the victim with one punch.
This sudden supposed assault on white people is not a new trend, as outlets like Glenn Beck's The Blaze would have you think. Similar assaults date back as far as 1992.
Conrad-Alvin-Barrett-e1388101212953
Of course, some are senseless enough to take the right wing media hype seriously--and one such person is twenty seven year old Conrad Alvin Barrett of Katy, TX. Barrett, who is fond of racial epithets and has a generally low opinion of African Americans according to police documents, spent a week "working up the courage" to "play" the "knockout game."
Barrett approached a young couple in a bar and asked them if they had heard of the "knockout game," and proceeded to show them a video of the attack he had spent so much time working up the courage to perform. In the video, Barrett approached an elderly African American man, asking him "how's it going man?" He then panned the camera up to show his soon-to-be victim. There was a loud smack, and the victim fell to the ground. Barrett laughed, said "Knockout" and then fled in his vehicle.
Unfortunately for the attacker, one of the people to whom he showed the video was an off-duty police officer. the couple left immediately and found a uniformed officer, to whom they reported the crime. The officer approached Barrett and asked him if he had shown a video to the couple. He admitted he had, but showed the officer a different and less "race-based-assaulty" offering from the phone.
After the phone was confiscated to be searched, police found ten additional videos related to the attack. In one, Barrett says "The plan is to see if I were to hit a black person, would this be nationally televised?"--an apparent reference to a right wing media-inspired belief that black people are given a "free pass" by the "lamestream" media.
In yet another video, Barrett uses the "n-word" and states that African Americans "haven't fully experienced the benefit of evolution."
Barrett's victim suffered two jaw fractures and underwent surgery as a result of the attack. Two metal plates were inserted in his jaw and three teeth were removed during the unfortunate man's four day hospital stay.
Let's stop sensationalizing violence. It's not the "knockout game." It's assault and battery. It's horrible. Random street violence is an issue, and it needs to end--but right wing media has a habit of taking a problem and, rather than offer a solution, make the problem worse by somehow turning it into a "white vs. black" thing.
As a result, some mindless twit who is incapable or unwilling to perform a logical analysis will always--ALWAYS--become inspired to act. White Barrett was likely a racist before right wing media came into play, it is doubtful that he would have done this had those outlets not preyed on his feeble-minded bigotry and fear of those different from him on a superficial level.
If you were wondering how conservatives are taking this...it seems the comment sections of most conservative web sites have descended into a link sharing party to prove that "blacks are worse," idiotic remarks about Eric Holder being directly responsible for this man;s prosecution because Holder hates white people, and of course that he was only prosecuted because he was white.
John Prager