E.W. Jackson: Using My Past Statements Against Me Is 'Persecution' and an Unconstitutional Religious Test
Submitted by Kyle Mantyla on Monday, 6/17/2013 4:21 PM
Submitted by Kyle Mantyla on Monday, 6/17/2013 4:21 PM
E. W. Jackson, the Republican candidate for Lt. Governor in
Virginia, was the guest on Bryan Fischer's radio program today where he
was treated to a sympathetic interview by a host who shares his radical
views.
During the discussion, Jackson stood by his anti-gay and
anti-abortion views and suggested that efforts to hold him accountable
for his previous statements now that he is running for office was
somehow an unconstitutional religious test.
Jackson seems to believe that things he said about political issues
are not relevant to his political candidacy because he said those
things in his capacity as a minister and so using them against him in
his campaign amounts to anti-Christian persecution:
It's a sad commentary on our media and culture today that
anybody that expresses a Biblical worldview is marginalized and,
frankly, not too put too fine a point on it, persecuted for doing so.
And I think that's a sad commentary.
But look, it's an attack ultimately on every church-going,
Bible-believing Christian out there who holds to a traditional worldview
and frankly, I think one of my goals is to champion their right to hold
their views without being persecuted for it.
...
I think Americans are tired of being told that holding to
Judeo-Christian values somehow makes you can idiot, as you put it, makes
you backwoods, makes you ignorant and unless you buy into the sort of
contemporary morality of the day, you are a person to be shunned.
Our Founding Fathers believed that there should never be a
religious test and yet that's what we're seeing today. We're seeing
people apply a religious test and they're saying anything you believed
or said as a minister disqualifies you from serving as Lt. Governor
because you hold to these Biblical views.
For some reason, Fischer did not disabuse Jackson of this notion
and explain that while "the federal government cannot use a religious
test, but voters can, and they should. Let’s be done with the nonsense
that asking questions about a candidate’s faith is inappropriate. It
certainly is not. In fact, in some ways, the faith questions are the
most important, because they go right to the issue of a man’s most
deeply held convictions and values."
Fil
- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/ew-jackson-using-my-past-statements-against-me-persecution-and-unconstitutional-religious-te#sthash.4sw8LMYA.dpuf
Fil
- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/ew-jackson-using-my-past-statements-against-me-persecution-and-unconstitutional-religious-te#sthash.4sw8LMYA.dpuf

Hold on a sec there... is this man saying that what someone said in the past can not be used against him?
ReplyDeleteAnd that when that what someone said in the past is used against him that practice is unconstitutional?
If that is what this man actually is saying, then everything that some muslim clerics have said in the past, and now is held against them, is unconstitutional..... and thus illegal, and thus unlawful!