UTAH: State AG Dropped Procreation Argument In Marriage Stay Demand
The
Salt Lake Tribune reports:
Utah made a subtle shift in its arguments in defense of opposite-sex marriage in a stay application
to the U.S. Supreme Court filed Tuesday. Gone is any mention of
procreation. Instead, the state talks about child-rearing without
discussing how children may be produced. Utah argues one reason it is
likely to ultimately prevail in reversing legalization of same-sex
marriage in the state is the "large and growing body of social science
research" that supports its "rational" interest in opposite-sex
marriage. That research, it argues, backs "the importance of providing
unique encouragement and protection for man-woman unions" because it
shows children do best when raised by their father and mother (whether
biological or adoptive) and limiting access to marriage to such unions
increases that likelihood. These are the core "legislative facts" that
lawmakers and voters have relied on in limiting marriage to man-woman
unions, it says.
So they are essentially basing their entire case on the debunked Regnerus
study.
No comments:
Post a Comment