TINE STEISS/WIKIMEDIA
Rice terraces in China
China pulls plug on genetically modified rice and corn
China pulls plug on genetically modified rice and corn
China’s
Ministry of Agriculture has decided not to renew biosafety certificates
that allowed research groups to grow genetically modified (GM) rice and
corn. The permits, to grow two varieties of GM rice and one transgenic
corn strain, expired on 17 August. The reasoning behind the move is not
clear, and it has raised questions about the future of related research
in China.
The ministry, with much
fanfare, had approved the GM rice certificates in August 2009. The
permits enabled a group at Huazhong Agricultural University in Wuhan to
produce two varieties of rice carrying a gene from the Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)
bacteria that provides pest resistance. At the same time, the ministry
approved production of a corn strain developed by the Chinese Academy of
Agricultural Sciences' Biotechnology
Research Institute in Beijing. Researchers had altered the corn so that
kernels contain phytase, a livestock feed additive that boosts
absorption of phosphorus, which enhances growth. All of the certificates
were valid for 5 years.
Since the certificates were issued,
however, public skepticism about the benefits of GM crops has grown in
China. Some scientists conducting GM plant research have been attacked when giving public lectures.
Why
the ministry allowed the certificates to lapse is in dispute. Some
environmentalists say public worries about
GM crops played a decisive role. "We believe that loopholes in
assessing and monitoring [GM] research, as well as the public concern
around safety issues are the most important reasons that the
certifications have not been renewed," writes Wang Jing, a Greenpeace
official based in Beijing, in an e-mail to ScienceInsider.
Others
believe agricultural economics also influenced the decision. China has
nearly reached self-sufficiency in producing rice using conventional
varieties, so the ministry has decided there is no need to commercialize
Bt rice in the near future, says Huang Jikun, director of the Chinese
Academy of Sciences' Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy. He says
that with commercialization off the table, there was no point in
renewing the certifications. Huang says "rising public concerns [about
the] safety of GM rice"
likely also played a role.
Whatever the reason, the decision
marks an abrupt change in fortunes for transgenic rice in China. Five
years ago, "China was widely expected to soon put GM rice on the
country’s dining tables," wrote Cao Cong, a China policy expert at University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom, in a post on The Conversation,
an Australian website. The Bt rice project "is now to all intents and
purposes dead and buried," he wrote, blaming an "anti-GM movement whose
power and influence are more than matched by its fervour and sheer,
undiluted paranoia."
Huang says this decision does not reflect
a change in China’s overall
policy regarding agricultural biotechnology. The government is
increasing its support for Bt corn research, other specialists note; GM
corn has faced less public opposition, in part because it is primarily
fed to livestock.
The researchers behind the affected GM crops could not be reached for comment.
Posted in Asia/Pacific, Biology, Envi ronment, Policy, Technology
No comments:
Post a Comment