Haaretz Sunday, October 12, 2014
A nightmare question highlights the importance of oral history
Alleged
disappearance of Jewish toddlers and illegal incarceration of
Palestinians in pre-state Israel show how those in power always try to
hide policies, and what is behind them.
By Amira Hass
A
nightmare question looms over the accounts being published on the
website of Haokets and the Journal of Palestine Studies. This is the
question about the alleged involvement of survivors of the Nazi murder
industry in regime crimes and in war crimes.
Haokets
is publishing a chilling list of family memories of babies who were
torn from their parents supposedly, or not, for the sake of their health
and welfare, and then supposedly died. On the anniversary of the death
of Rabbi Uzi Meshulam, the non-profit organizations Amram, which
researches the disappearance and trafficking by the Israeli government
of Jewish children from Yemen, the Balkans and Arab countries, and the
Achoti feminist organization held two “awareness days of the affair of
the children from Yemen, the East and the Balkans.” Young people came
and told their painful family secrets.
These
stories have a similar pattern. A hospital nurse, physician or
community apparatchik makes a comment how there are so many children in a
particular family that the disappearance of one of them should not be
painful; the body they were not allowed to see; the enlistment notice
that arrives in the mail 18 years later.
The
estimated number of vanished children ranges between 1,500 and 5,000;
1,033 official complaints were made to the investigative committees
about the disappearance of children aged between infancy and four years.
Most of the complaints – about 700 – came from Yemenite families.
These
awareness days prove that members of the second and third generations
of Jewish immigrants from Arab and Muslim lands do not believe the
results of the official investigation. Even if no policy was imposed
from above, even if most of the infants died and were not kidnapped for
the purpose of adoption by Ashkenazi families, mainly, even if it was
only the condescension of members of the white culture toward the
“shvartzes,” they do not believe that the establishment wants to uncover
the truth.
As
the leading law professor Boaz Sangero wrote 12 years ago in the
journal Theory & Criticism (“Where There Is No Suspicion There Is No
Real Investigation: The Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the
Disappearance of the Children of Jewish Yemenite Immigrants to Israel”),
an analysis of the report by the investigative committee (from 2001)
shows that the way the committee handled the acts and serious failures
partially detailed in the report was tolerant in the extreme. Sangero
cites as one example the destruction of the archives under the
committee’s very nose even as it was doing its work – an act that raised
no suspicion among its members or even merited the mention of such a
suspicion.
The
Journal of Palestine Studies has devoted its latest edition to “Israel:
A Carceral State.” Since Israel’s founding, the state has incarcerated
Palestinians in various ways: in jails, in sealed enclaves or by severe
restrictions on movement. Methods of imprisonment developed in 1948 and
during the 1950s were “exported” to the territory that was occupied in
1967 and are being used to this day.
The
leading article in the journal, entitled “The ICRC and Israel’s
POW\Labor Camps,” deals with the detention and forced-labor camps that
the young State of Israel established for Palestinians – a chilling
episode that is relatively unknown and underresearched. Researchers
Salman Abu Sitta and Terry Rempel base their work on Red Cross reports
from the time and interviews with former prisoners. There were five
known detention camps and at least 17 others that were unofficial (where
Red Cross personnel were not allowed to visit). The detainees were not
combatants, and as one Red Cross report read in part, the Jewish
authorities “treated all the Arabs between the ages of 16 and 55 as
combatants and locked them up as prisoners of war.”
The
detainees were taken from one detention facility to another. There are
reports of abuse, the inflicting of hunger and thirst, interrogation
under torture, soldiers and guards who murdered detainees, and differing
treatment of prisoners from rural backgrounds as compared with those
from the upper-middle class, who knew the rights and responsibilities of
their captors.
At
least 5,000 Palestinian civilians are known to have been held in the
recognized detention facilities. They were sent to perform various kinds
of forced labor for the newly-established state, from housekeeping
duties to paving roads to moving heavy rocks. They were released
afterward – often thanks to Red Cross mediation – but release from
prison meant expulsion from their homeland.
Marwan
Iqab al-Yehiya wrote in his statement, which Abu Sitta and Rempel cite
in their article, that the prisoners (among whom he was one) were “lined
up and ordered to strip naked as a punishment for the escape of two
prisoners at night. [Jewish] adults and children came from the nearby
kibbutz to watch us line up naked and laugh. To us this was most
degrading.”
Another
former prisoner, Abd al Qadir Abu Sayf, recalled: “In the early morning
we were taken to work. They hit us on our heads to move. If one fell,
they kicked him with their boots .... The torture sometimes continued at
night.”
Now
we reach the nightmare question: In the accounts of Jewish family
members about their relatives’ disappearance, sometimes “Holocaust
survivors” are mentioned as having received the children for “adoption.”
Whether they were survivors or not, this was a manifestation of cruelty
on the part of those who saw “the blacks” as inferior.
In
an article about the Palestinian study published on the Lebanese
website Al Akhbar, Abu Sitta said that German Jews were among the guards
at the detention camps (a detail that does not appear in his article in
the Journal of Palestine Studies). Whether they were German Jews or
not, forcing prisoners to line up naked and using boots on those who
fall are part of the family histories of many of us, but from the other
side.
No comments:
Post a Comment