Brazil: Five Centuries of Change by Thomas E. Skidmore. Europeans in the 1400s and 1500s, including devout Christian groups such as the Jesuits, developed theological justifications for slavery:
"Slavery [of sub-Saharan
Africans] did not begin in the Americas. The Portuguese had been
bringing Africans to work as slaves in Portugal since at least the
mid-fifteenth century. Given the tenets of the Christian faith ... they
looked for and found two principles that could be used as legal
justification for enslaving other human beings The first was the
principle of the Just War, derived from the debates of classical
philosophers and the writings of Christian theologians on how the
killing inherent in war could be justified, given the Sixth Commandment
(thou shalt not kill). Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) thought up the answer.
He specified a war as just and not a sin when three conditions were
met. The sovereign had to give authority for it; those who were attacked
should deserve it; and the attackers should intend, by their actions,
to advance good in the world. The second principle was used to justify
slave trading (i.e., the purchase of slaves). This was the principle of
ransoming (resgate) -- that is, buying back of -- persons who had been taken as prisoners of war, presumably by the 'unjust' side. Resgate
was a very useful rationalization in Brazil because indigenous tribes
were sometimes found to have captured members of other tribes for
cannibalism ceremonies -- making it particularly 'virtuous' for the
colonists to save them from such an 'unjust' fate.
Debret: a Guarani family captured by slave hunters in Brazil.
|
"The Jesuits were just as
comfortable with the principles used to justify the legality of
enslavement as were the colonists. Indeed, slave labor was considered
necessary to run the mission villages (aldeias) that the
Jesuits founded to house the indigenous people they were striving to
convert. Jesuits also needed indigenous slaves to run the cattle
ranches, cotton plantations, and sugar plantations they set up to
finance their mission (and possibly enrich themselves in the process).
"But many Jesuits had considerable qualms about how the settlers were applying the slavery principles on the ground, including the fact that they sometimes raided the mission villages, capturing any Indians they could and causing thousands of others to flee (and thus be lost from the Jesuit sphere of influence). The leader of the Jesuits' first mission to Brazil, Manuel da Nobrega, for example, assessed the colonists' motives this way: 'their subjection of the Indians is not to save them nor to know Christ ... but to rob them of their sons, their daughters, and their women.' But Manuel da Nobrega's sentiments about the indigenous peoples were not always noble. At another point, possibly after the first bishop of Brazil was killed and eaten by indigenous people after a shipwreck, he said, 'Indians are dogs who kill and eat one another. And in their vices and dealings with one another, they are pigs.' "
"But many Jesuits had considerable qualms about how the settlers were applying the slavery principles on the ground, including the fact that they sometimes raided the mission villages, capturing any Indians they could and causing thousands of others to flee (and thus be lost from the Jesuit sphere of influence). The leader of the Jesuits' first mission to Brazil, Manuel da Nobrega, for example, assessed the colonists' motives this way: 'their subjection of the Indians is not to save them nor to know Christ ... but to rob them of their sons, their daughters, and their women.' But Manuel da Nobrega's sentiments about the indigenous peoples were not always noble. At another point, possibly after the first bishop of Brazil was killed and eaten by indigenous people after a shipwreck, he said, 'Indians are dogs who kill and eat one another. And in their vices and dealings with one another, they are pigs.' "
Brazil: Five Centuries of Change, 2nd Edition
Author: Thomas E. Skidmore
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Copyright 1999, 2010 by Oxford University Press, Inc.
Pages: 29-31
No comments:
Post a Comment