The House of Commons will vote to affirm the position, which has been endorsed by members of the opposition. Recognition of a Palestinian state has garnered support this past week, however the Foreign Ministry has referred to the vote as ‘symbolic’, and will thus not likely to effect the UK’s foreign policy
Oct 13, 2014, 10:32AM | Jacob Northbrook
British Parliament, archives Reuters
Palestinian Diplomatic War Wages On: Today (Monday) the British House
of Commons will vote on recognition of a future Palestinian state.
Sources in the UK have referred to the vote as “symbolic and
nonbinding,” however were the motion to pass, such would mark an
important victory for Abu Mazen in his efforts for Palestinian
Independence. 24 pro-Israel members of the House submitted an amended
version of the legislation, which has yet to be accepted.
The pro-Israel contingent in the House has
requested of the Speaker, John Bercow, to determine that British support
would be conditional on a Palestinian state formed by a bilateral peace
agreement with the State of Israel. Bercow has yet to respond to the
recommendation, which is meant to soften the original proposition of
recognition.
“Britain maintains the right to recognize a Palestinian state at any time, so long as this serves the purpose of peace- we continue to believe that negotiations which lead to two states for two peoples, are the only solution to the conflict,” read a statement by the Foreign Ministry.
Head of the opposition, and leader of the Labour Party, Ed Milliband, attempted to secure support for the proposition by enforcing party discipline thereby compelling members of his party to support the motion. Meanwhile, select members of the Labour party asked to ‘rebel’ against the party and vote independently, or remain absent for the vote itself. Other members criticized Milliband for introducing drastic changes to a foreign policy which has been otherwise “measured and responsible.”
“Britain maintains the right to recognize a Palestinian state at any time, so long as this serves the purpose of peace- we continue to believe that negotiations which lead to two states for two peoples, are the only solution to the conflict,” read a statement by the Foreign Ministry.
Head of the opposition, and leader of the Labour Party, Ed Milliband, attempted to secure support for the proposition by enforcing party discipline thereby compelling members of his party to support the motion. Meanwhile, select members of the Labour party asked to ‘rebel’ against the party and vote independently, or remain absent for the vote itself. Other members criticized Milliband for introducing drastic changes to a foreign policy which has been otherwise “measured and responsible.”
No comments:
Post a Comment