Tags
Daniel Zadik (TC) : When
a human bone was found on a gravelly riverbank by a bone-carver who was
searching for mammoth ivory, little did he know it would provide the
oldest modern-human genome yet sequenced. The anatomically modern male
thigh-bone, found near the town of Ust’-Ishim in south-western Siberia,
has been radiocarbon-dated to around 45,000 years old.
This
was an interesting time in human prehistory. Although within the
most-recent ice age, it was a relatively warm period, sometimes proposed
as the point at which modern humans entered Europe. It is also when the
artefacts left by many modern humans start to develop from tools
similar to those used by older human species to more sophisticated ones.
At the same time, we see appearance of evidence for fishing, trade, music and art.
Behold the femur. Bence Viola, MPI EVA
Isotope analysis
suggests that Ust’-Ishim man’s diet included fish, and he was
discovered not far from the Kara-Bom site, at which such artefacts have
been found. So it seems likely that these were the kinds of objects he
used.
How humans colonised the Earth
The story of modern humans starts much earlier,
around 200,000 years ago, in Africa. By about 50,000 years ago, the
Middle East had been colonised, and from there, other areas of Eurasia.
The
reality is that the spread of humanity was complex, with millions of
individuals moving, reproducing and generally getting on with life. But
simple models that group people into populations can give useful
approximations of the truth. One well-supported model
has one population, the “beachcombers”, migrating east along the south
Asian coast and eventually populating Australia and another group
migrating north inland later and then spreading both east and west to
provide the majority of ancestry for the people of Eurasia.
To
see where the Ust’-Ishim man fits into to this picture, his DNA
sequence was compared to that of many modern and ancient individuals,
and mutations used to suggest how they are related to each other.
Mutations
are the random changes that happen in all DNA sequences over time.
While some have significant consequences, most don’t. They are passed
down to descendants and, when detected in sequence data, they can be
used to build a family tree of sorts. If two individuals share a
mutation, they must be descended from the same ancestor.
Ust’-Ishim
man has many mutations that are common across most of the world, but
not in Africa. This isn’t surprising. Like the inhabitants of those
places, he descended from the pioneering group that moved from Africa to
the Middle East – and any mutations that happened within that
population had a good chance of being carried around the world.
What
is more interesting is that he does not carry many of the mutations
that characterise any proposed migration since then, neither the
beachcombers nor inlanders, Asian or European. This suggests that he was
part of a different northward migration from the Middle East than the
one that populated these continents. Maybe his people died out before or
during the later influx – or maybe they were just outnumbered and
absorbed.
Meeting the Neanderthals
Another
interesting part of this story is that, when modern humans arrived,
Eurasia was already inhabited. As they spread they came across archaic
humans, descendants of earlier out-of-Africa migrations. These included
the Neanderthals, Denisovans and Homo erectus – and none of them survived the meeting.
However,
it has become increasingly clear that this is not the whole story.
Previous sequencing projects have shown that all today’s non-Africans
have interbreeding with Neanderthals to thank for 1.5-2% of their DNA. And indeed, the famous bones found at Skhul and Qafzeh
in Israel-Palestine appear to have a mixture of modern and Neanderthal
traits and have been proposed as hybrids. However, whether they
contributed to today’s gene-pool or died out is unknown.
With
the help of new tools, Svante Pääbo at the Max Planck Institute for
Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany has developed ways to sequence DNA
obtained from ancient bones. This is no easy feat because DNA, just like
other carbon-containing compounds, degrades on its own as time passes
by. However, Pääbo was able to recover enough from the bone to run
comparative tests.
He and his colleagues, in a study published in the journal Nature,
found that Ust’-Ishim man has a similar proportion of Neanderthal
ancestry to today’s non-African. It was contributed 7,000 to 13,000
years before Ust’-Ishim man lived (about 50,000 to 60,000 ago). This is
much later than the Skhul-Qafzeh people, making them an unlikely
ancestor.
However,
it is difficult to be sure whether Ust’-Ishim man’s forebears account
for Neanderthal ancestry of people today. The dating of this
hybridisation to so near most proposed dates for the colonisation of the
Middle East suggests that it might well be at least part of the
explanation.
Daniel Zadik, The Conversation – Daniel Zadik is a postdoctoral researcher in genetics at University of Leicester.
No comments:
Post a Comment