The Orange Man
By Uri Avnery
SO HERE we are. Either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton will be our next president.
"Our"? I am not a US citizen, and have no desire to be one.
But I live in a
world in which the USA is the sole superpower, in which every decision
of the US administration has an impact on the lives of every human
being.
FOR ME AS a
citizen of Israel, this impact is much greater than for most and much
more immediate. I just saw a cartoon showing both Trump and Hillary
crawling on the ground and licking the boots of an Israeli soldier. This
is not too much of an exaggeration.
Both candidates
claim to be unwavering supporters of "Israel". But what does that mean?
Do they support all sections of Israeli society?
Certainly not.
They support one certain part of Israel: the ultra-right-wing government
of Binyamin Netanyahu, which is supported by the American Jewish
billionaires who contribute to their coffers.
Supporting
Netanyahu and his even more right-wing coalition partners means acting
against me and millions of other Israelis who can see that Netanyahu is
leading our state to disaster.
Yet I have no right to vote. It is a clear case of "no representation", imposed on me and some billions of other human beings.
BE THAT as it may, I have a clear interest in this election. So I want at least to express my opinion.
Right at the beginning, I wrote that Donald Trump reminded me in some ways of Adolf Hitler.
Now, after all
the primaries and conventions, as the race assumes its final form, I am
afraid that I must repeat that terrible assessment.
Of course,
there are huge dissimilarities. The man looks different. He has
orange-colored hair. His body language is different, and so is his style
of speech.
Different times. Different countries. Different circumstances.
And, first of
all, different media. Hitler was a product of the radio. It was his
voice, a unique instrument, that conquered the German masses. I am told
that today's German young people burst into laughter when they see old
clips of Hitler's speeches.
Trump is a
creation of the TV era. He dominates the small screen. He beat all his
rivals on TV. He will easily beat Hillary on TV. If the battle were
fought only on TV, it would already have been decided for good.
THE SIMILARITY between Trump and Hitler exists on a different level.
In the center
of Trump's entire campaign there stands one word, indeed one letter:
"I". There is no "We". No normal ideology. No real program.
It is all about "I", about Trump. Trump will come. Trump will fix everything.
That was the
essence of Hitlerism, too. The man had no real program. (Yes, there was
something called "the 24 points", put together by the party's
ideologues, but Hitler ignored them completely. Once he exclaimed in
despair: "I wish we had never heard of them!")
This was also
true of the man who invented Fascism: Benito Mussolini. The Italian
dictator, Hitler's teacher in many ways, did not know the word "we"
either. The first of the "Ten Commandments" of fascism was: "Mussolini
is always right". So with Trump.
The absolute centrality of the Leader is the hallmark of fascism. Trump's program is Trump.
THIS BEING so,
all of Trump's declarations and policy statements are totally
unimportant. Pundits who analyze them, who turn them over and over, who
look for hidden meanings, are just wasting their time. There is no real
meaning, either open or hidden.
Statements are
made on the spur of the moment because they suit Trump at that moment.
They are forgotten the next, sometimes to be replaced by the opposite.
They are an instrument, nothing more.
This is why it is so easy to catch Trump uttering a lie. I have seen lists of dozens of them, one more blatant than the next.
There again we
have the example of Adolf Hitler. In his book "Mein Kampf" ("My
Struggle") he speaks about this openly. The book itself is quite boring,
the product of a third-rate mind, but it includes several chapters
about "propaganda" which are fascinating.
(Many people
credit Joseph Goebbels with the invention of Nazi propaganda. But the
"little doctor" was only a disciple of the Fuehrer himself.)
As a front-line
soldier throughout the four years of World War I (yet never rising
above the rank of lance-corporal) Hitler was immensely impressed by the
British propaganda effort aimed at the German lines. Hitler admired the
British slogans, which to him were a pack of lies. One of his
conclusions was that the bigger the lie, the bigger its chances of being
believed, since a simple person cannot imagine that anybody would dare
to lie so much.
(Actually,
Hitler vastly overestimated the effectiveness of the British propaganda.
It started to have effect only when the German lines were already
crumbling.)
There seems to
be no lie too big for Donald Trump. His followers do not mind. Truth
means nothing to them. Trump trumps truth every time.
HILLARY CLINTON
is a good, ordinary politician. Her outstanding attribute is that she
is a woman. That, by itself, is very important. Though Golda Meir taught
me that a woman can be as catastrophic as a man.
You can, with
fair assurance, imagine what a Hillary Clinton presidency would look
like. She is dependable, predictable. More of the same, though without
the charm of Barack (and Michelle!) Obama.
No one can predict a Trump presidency. Every prediction is a leap in the dark.
One thing seems
real: his admiration for Vladimir Putin. Though he is the very opposite
of the cool, calculating, bold but cautious former KGB apparatchik,
Trump seems to admire him.
There is not
much evidence that the admiration is mutual, but it seems certain that
today's successors of the KGB are interfering actively in the American
election, doing their utmost to help Trump and sabotage Hillary.
Trump has already declared that he would not automatically come to the aid of Latvia, it [it if] this former Soviet and now NATO country were attacked by Russia. Has Latvia paid for its defense?
("Mr.
President, the Russian army has just invaded Latvia! Shall we send our
troops in?" – "Wait, wait! First check if the damn Latvians have paid
their dues to NATO!")
A US-Russian
rapprochement may be a good thing. The present American knee-jerk enmity
towards everything Russian is a remnant of the Cold War and bad for the
world at large. I don't see why the two powers cannot cooperate in many
fields.
Towards the
third power, China, the Trump attitude is the opposite. He wants to
annul the trade agreements and bring the jobs back home. Even I, a
non-economist, can see that this is nonsense.
And so forth. It's all like seeing a man about to jump from the roof out of sheer curiosity.
The Germans who
voted in April 1933 for Adolf Hitler and his party did not dream about
World War II, though Hitler was already resolved to conquer Eastern
Europe and open it up for German colonization. They were hypnotized by
Hitler's personality. And – unlike the President of the USA - the German
Reichskanzler was not the most important leader in the world.
I HATE the
choice of the Lesser Evil. In twenty Israeli election campaigns (except
the four in which I was myself a candidate) I have voted for parties I
did not like very much and for candidates I did not trust at all.
But this is a
fact of life. If there is no candidate you can root for, you take the
one who can cause the minimum damage. In 1933 my father voted for a
German conservative party, because he believed that they were the only
ones who had a chance of stopping the Nazis. As Pierre Mendes-France
once said: "to live is to choose".
I want to say
to all my American friends: Go out and vote for Hillary, whether you
like her or not. Liking does not really come into it.
Don't stay at home. Not voting means voting for Trump.
An old Jewish
joke speaks about a rich Jew, who was detested by everyone in the
community. When he died, nobody was prepared to make the funeral speech,
in which one is allowed by custom only to say positive things. At long
last one person volunteered.
"We all know that the dear deceased was an awful person," he said. "But compared to his son he was an angel!"
Well, Hillary Clinton is not awful. She is an acceptable candidate. But compared to Donald Trump, she is an angel.