US security advisors recommend moving away from private prisons for immigration detainees
US immigration law [JURIST backgrounder] continues to be a controversial and heavily politicized area of law at both the state and federal levels. Earlier this week the Supreme Court heard argument [JURIST report] in , an immigration case that will determine the permissible length of detention before a bond hearing is necessary, if one is required at all. In October the Supreme Court denied a petition to rehear [JURIST report] , a case challenging the Obama administration's policies supporting deferred action which would permit around 4 million immigrants to legally remain and continue working in the US. In September the Ninth Circuit ruled that children facing deportation proceedings may not file a class action suit [JURIST report] to determine whether they are entitled to an attorney as a due process right. In September 2015 the US Commission on Civil Rights issued a report criticizing [JURIST report] the Obama administration's immigration detention facilities, stating that some "are not fully complying with detention standards regarding medical care, legal information and other basic standards of treatment." In August 2015 a California judge upheld her July decision [JURIST reports] and ordered the government to release immigrant children held in family detention centers, "without necessary delay."
No comments:
Post a Comment