Search This Blog

Thursday, April 30, 2015

Pastor Defends Homophobic Billboard: 'I See A Homosexual Just Like A Murderer'

Far from the steps of the Supreme Court, a pastor in Milledgeville, Georgia, is using the marriage equality case as an opportunity to denounce homosexuality. Read more.
Pastor Defends Homophobic Billboard: 'I See A Homosexual Just Like A Murderer'

Anti-Gay GOP Politician Comes Out After Being Caught Sending Explicit Photos On Grindr

"The 1,000-pound gorilla has been lifted," Rep. Randy Boehning said, confirming to the outlet that he had used the app to meet men. "I have to confront it at some point." Read more.
Anti-Gay GOP Politician Comes Out After Being Caught Sending Explicit Photos On Grindr

ACLU launches cellphone app to preserve videos of police

ACLU launches cellphone app to preserve videos of police

Los Angeles Times | April 30, 2015 | 10:02 AM
Californians who use their cellphones to record police encounters with the public on video will be able to automatically transmit the video directly to a local chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union using a smartphone application launched today.
By using the Mobile Justice CA app to send recordings to the ACLU, leaders of the organization said, people can ensure that video of potential police misconduct is preserved, even if their cellphone is tampered with or destroyed.
Read more>>

Prisoner in police van said Freddie Gray was ‘banging against the walls’ during ride

Prisoner in police van said Freddie Gray was ‘banging against the walls’ during ride
A prisoner sharing a Baltimore police transport van with Freddie Gray told investigators that he could hear Gray “banging against the walls” of the vehicle and believed he “was intentionally trying to injure himself,” according to an investigative document obtained by The Washington Post. The prisoner, who is currently in jail, was separated from Gray by a metal partition and could not see him. His statement is contained in an application for a search warrant, which is sealed by the court.
Read more »

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Day of Remembrance for all Victims of Chemical Warfare, 29 April

Day of Remembrance for all Victims of Chemical Warfare, 29 April

un.org - Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon addresses the opening of the Third Review Conference of the States Parties of the Chemical Weapons Convention, being held 8-19 April 2013, in The Hague, the Netherland...

Straight High-Schooler Invites Gay Best Friend To The Prom

Straight High-Schooler Invites Gay Best Friend To The Prom




It’s prom season, so we expected to read a lot of stories about lonely teenagers asking celebrities to be their dates.
What we didn’t expect is the totally awesome Jacob Lescenski of Las Vegas to ask his best friend Anthony Martinez to prom.
Jacob is straight, and Anthony is gay, but Jacob figured who better to go to the dance with than someone he considers a brother?
Jacob popped the question by unfurling a giant banner that read “You’re hella gay, I’m hella str8, but you’re like my brother so be my d8!”
Anthony is on the student council, and is often responsible for planning school dances, but lamented that he never gets asked to go. 
“He’s a real man,” Anthony said of Jacob in a post, “given that he has the guts to fulfill my gay student council dream of always helping out planning dances, and never getting asked. I couldn’t ask for a better person in my life.”
Screen Shot 2015-04-23 at 3.26.34 PM
The guys’ story  has gone viral, and Twitter has blown up with messages of support for these two classy bros.

Anti-Gay North Dakota Lawmaker Caught Sending Nude Pics to Another Man on Grindr

Anti-Gay North Dakota Lawmaker Caught Sending Nude Pics to Another Man on Grindr |News | Towleroad

towleroad.com
towleroad.com - State Rep. Randy Boehning, a North Dakota lawmaker who voted against bills protecting gay people from discrimination, was caught exchanging photos of his junk to another man on Grindr, the Grand Fo...

[New] AG on SCOTUS Marriage Arguments: Gay Couples Deserve 'Equal Dignity and Equal Treatment' Now

AG Loretta Lynch on SCOTUS Marriage Arguments: Gay Couples Deserve 'Equal Dignity and Equal Treatment' Now |News | Towleroad

towleroad.com
towleroad.com - Newly sworn-in Attorney General Loretta Lynch has released a statement with regard to today's U.S. Supreme Court hearings on same-sex marriage. Says Lynch in the statement provided to Towleroad: “I...

Inventing a Record of Iranian Aggression

Inventing a Record of Iranian Aggression

consortiumnews.com
consortiumnews.com - Following the lead of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, Official Washington’s neocons are hyping Iran’s record as an aggressor state, with some examples harkening back to the Sixteenth Century and ...

Cleveland Cop Says He ‘Feared For His Life’ When He Shot Unarmed People 49 Times

Lawyer For Cleveland Cop Says He ‘Feared For His Life’ When He Shot Unarmed People 49 Times

countercurrentnews.com - The lawyer representing a Cleveland police officer charged in the fatal shooting of two unarmed suspects just said that his client “feared for his life” when he fired 49 rounds into the windshield ...

Indian Hindu leader calls for sterilisation of Muslims and Christians

Posted: 28 Apr 2015 06:33 AM PDT
In a shocking incident, a Hindu Mahasabha leader made a statement saying Muslims and Christians in the country should be sterilized in order to check their increasing population.
According to a report by India Today, Sadhvi Deva Thakur, vice president of All India Hindu Mahasabha stirred up a controversy after she said that the growing population of Christians and Muslims posed a threat to Hindus.
“The population of Muslims and Christians is growing day by day. To rein in this, Centre will have to impose emergency, and Muslims and Christians will have to be forced to undergo sterilisation so that they can’t increase their numbers,” Thakur said.
This is not the first time she has made a controversial statement. Recently, she had encouraged Hindus to have more children so that the Hindu population could outgrow other religious populations of the world.
According to the report, she made another controversial remark when she said that idols of Hindu gods and goddesses should be placed in mosques and churches.
The news comes in the wake of Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut’s controversial statement asking the voting rights of Muslims to be revoked for some years to ensure the community is not used for vote bank politics.
“If Muslims are only being used this way to play politics, then they can never develop. Muslims will have no future till they are used to play vote bank politics and thus Balasaheb had demanded that the voting rights of Muslims should be taken away. What he said is right,” Raut wrote in an article in the latest issue of the Shiv Sena’s mouthpiece Saamna.
Balasaheb Thackeray was the founder of Shiv Sena.
“Balasaheb had said 15 years ago that if the voting rights of Muslims are taken away for a few years, then the vote bank politics will stop,” Raut reiterated in the article.
Source

French student banned from school for wearing long black skirt [too conspicuously religious]

Posted: 28 Apr 2015 11:44 PM PDT
A 15-year-old Muslim girl has been banned from class twice for wearing a long black skirt seen as too openly religious for secularFrance, in a casethat has sparked an outcry.
The girl was stopped from going to class earlier this month by the headteacher who reportedly felt the long skirt “conspicuously” showed religious affiliation, which is banned in schools by France’s strict secularity laws.
“The girl was not excluded, she was asked to come back with a neutral outfit and it seems her father did not want the student to come back to school,” local education official Patrice Dutot told AFP on Tuesday.
He admitted that the student always removed her veil before entering school premises in the north-eastern town of Charleville-Mezieres, as is specifically stipulated by law.
According to the 2004 law that governs secularity in schools, veils, the Jewish kippa or large Christian crosses are banned in educational establishments, but “discreet religious signs” are allowed.
The student, identified as Sarah by local daily newspaper L’Ardennais, told the paper that her skirt was “nothing special, it’s very simple, there’s nothing conspicuous. There is no religious sign whatsoever”.
Her story was trending on Twitter in France with the hashtag #JePorteMaJupeCommeJeVeux, translated into English as “I wear my skirt as I please”.
“If it’s worn by a ‘white’ person, it’s hippy chic, if it’s a Muslim, it becomes conspicuous,” one user tweeted.
But the regional education office hinted in a statement that wearing the skirt could have been part of a concerted “provocation.”
“When it comes to concerted protest actions by students, which follow other more visible incidents linked for instance to wearing the veil, the secular framework for education must be firmly reminded and guaranteed,” it said.
According to the CCIF Islamophobia watchdog, about 130 students were rejected from class last year for outfits deemed too openly religious.
Source

Muslim prisoner forced to drink urine and have sex with dog, India

Muslim prisoner forced to drink urine and have sex with dog, India
Posted: 29 Apr 2015 02:23 AM PDT
A prosecution witness in a case involving three bombings in Mumbai has recently told a special court that the police had forced him to drink the urine of another accused and have “sex with a stray dog” when he was in custody 12 years ago.
The witness’s statement reads, “I was made to drink gutter water and urine… It is correct that I was asked to drink urine of another accused and my urine (was given) to him.” The witness further alleged that they were forced to have sex with a stray dog and that he was regularly beaten up in the police custody from April 24, 2003, till he was released on May 17, 2003.
The police have chargesheeted 16 people in the case, which involves bombings at Mumbai Central station on December 6, 2002, at suburban Vile Parle on January 27, 2003, and the Mulund train blast on March 13, 2003. The witness, in his alleged statement, had revealed the role of one Saquib Nachan, an accused and alleged SIMI member, in carrying the explosives. On April 23, the witness, when asked by the defence lawyer about the alleged torture meted out to him, told the court: ”I cannot tell those dirty things which they asked me to do in the crime branch office as women advocates are present (here) in the court.”
After the witness’s deposition, the special public prosecutor Rohini Salian declared him hostile. The prosecution witness, the 126th in the case, corroborated the torture claims made by another accused in 2003. The accused, who was named by the witness, in a written statement to the court in 2003 had claimed that three crime branch officers tortured him — an allegation denied by police.
Source

Will Obama Pick Another Fight with Israel?

Will Obama Pick Another Fight with Israel?

by Steven J. Rosen
The Washington Times
April 27, 2015
Originally published under the title, "Picking Another Fight with Israel."
President Obama is considering abandoning the decades-long U.S. policy of standing with Israel at the UN.
The concessions that President Obama is making to Iran have alarmed not just the right in Israel but also the left, and forced pro-Israel Democrats to choose between loyalty to the President and steadfast support for the Jewish state. Even former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has cautioned that "we need to all work together to return the special U.S.-Israel relationship to constructive footing, to get back to basic shared concerns and interests."
But the President apparently intends to go in another direction, to open a second conflict with Israel over its vital interests. According to Bloomberg News, "The administration has signaled that it might abandon the decades-long U.S. policy of protecting Israel at the UN and back a [French]Security Council resolution laying out terms for a two-state solution ...Robert Malley, the Middle East director for President Barack Obama's National Security Council, told at least one European nation" that the Administration may support a resolution "defining the parameters for a Mideast peace agreement, according to a report on the conversation to superiors by a Washington-based European diplomat...viewed by Bloomberg News."
President Obama apparently intends to open a second conflict with Israel over its vital interests.
Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, says the purpose of his UN resolution is "pressure...from the international community" to dictate "clear parameters" for negotiations that must be concluded within 24 months. According to the French draft circulated in November, it is the UN Security Council that "decides" the parameters of the "negotiated solution." It also rules that henceforward the negotiations should include "close involvement, alongside the parties, of major stakeholders" to continue to pressure the parties during the bilateral negotiations.
This resolution would be a triumph for those who have long wanted the Great Powers to dictate Israel's future, as demanded by the Arab League since Israel's creation. The Jewish people returned to their ancestral home so they could make a Jewish decision about their own destiny and no longer be subject to the will of others.
This resolution seizes that authority and moves it to a forum where Israel is not even a member, a body aptly described by U.S. Ambassador Jeanne Kirkpatrick three decades ago: "The Security Council more closely resembles a mugging than either a political debate or an effort at problem-solving....Israel is cast as villain...in [a] melodrama...that features...many attackers and a great deal of verbal violence...The goal is isolation and humiliation of the victim."
A UN resolution imposing solutions to the conflict contradicts the Obama Administration's own declared principles.
A resolution to impose solutions also contradicts the Obama Administration's own principles enunciated on February 18, 2011, by U.S. Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice (now the President's National Security Adviser), "We think it unwise for this Council to attempt to resolve the core issues that divide Israelis and Palestinians... The only way to reach that common goal is through direct negotiations between the parties... It is the Israelis' and Palestinians' conflict, and even the best-intentioned outsiders cannot resolve it for them." Such a resolution at the Security Council "risks hardening the positions of both sides. It could encourage the parties to stay out of negotiations and, if and when they did resume, to return to the Security Council whenever they reach an impasse."
The specific terms of the draft French resolution make it more onerous. It demands "a full phased withdrawal of Israeli security forces," without reference to Israel's right to secure borders previously guaranteed by Resolution 242 in 1967. In this resolution, the cardinal rule is that "Security arrangements must respect the sovereignty...of Palestine" to be "within the framework established by this resolution."
Most Israelis believe that full withdrawal of the IDF from the West Bank under today's conditions would lead quickly to a takeover by Hamas, which is being armed by Iran to overpower the Palestinian Authority (PA). General Yaakov Amidror, who was national security adviser to Prime Minister Netanyahu until November 2013, said that, without the presence of the IDF, the PA "cannot survive for even 10 minutes."
Mr. Abbas himself confronted Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal directly in August 2014 about Hamas plots in the West Bank. "You smuggle weapons, explosives, and cash to the West Bank, not for the fight with Israel, but for a coup against the PA...My security agencies have proof." Mr. Abbas said that the IDF "arrested 93 Hamas members who were preparing for a coup against the PA in the West Bank." In June 2007, Mr. Abbas accused Hamas of trying to assassinate him and publicly condemned Hamas as "murderous terrorists" and "coup plotters."
A Hamas state in the West Bank, or a collapse of central authority and the eruption of civil war there, would be a disaster for Israel. A West Bank swarming with rockets, missiles, and suicide bombers would bring the war to Israel's adjacent heartland. With Jerusalem as "the shared capital of the two States," as demanded by the resolution, there would not be any barrier to terrorist infiltration into Israel.
Hamas covets the West Bank because it knows that the West Bank's proximity to the Israeli heartland would make it a much more effective platform for attacks on Israel, than firing from Gaza. In September 2014, Hamas founder Mahmoud Al-Zahar said that if his movement were to "transfer what it has or just a small part of it to the West Bank, we would be able to settle the battle of the final promise with a speed that no one can imagine." In another speech he said, "If only the West Bank had one quarter of what Gaza has of resistance tools, the Israeli entity would end in one day...Can you imagine what would happen if the enemy is targeted from the West Bank...?"
In the real conditions of the Middle East, it is impossible to devise security arrangements to protect the people of Israel without at least some imposition on the sovereignty of the Palestinian state in the West Bank, contravening this resolution. Even the Clinton Parameters at Camp David in 2000, for example, provided that Israel should maintain early warning facilities in the West Bank and have access to airspace over the West Bank for operational needs.
The French draft resolution says in effect that Israelis have no right to be in the lands of their forefathers.
Beyond the security issue, the French draft UN resolution also says in effect that the people of Israel have no right to be in the lands of their forefathers. It determines that Israeli communities outside the 1949 Armistice Line (never a recognized legal boundary), including those in the eastern part of Jerusalem and near the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron and in the large Jerusalem suburb of Maale Adumim, "have no legal validity."
In one stroke, the UN would threaten the titles to their homes of 41% of the Jews living in Jerusalem, those in Jewish neighborhoods like Ramot, Ramat Shlomo, Neve Yaakov, Pisgat Ze'ev, East Talpiot, Har Homa and Gilo. Mr. Obama's own Middle East envoy George Mitchell said, "The Israelis are not going to stop...construction in East Jerusalem. For the Israelis, what they're building in is in part of Israel...We could spend the next 14 years arguing over disputed legal issues, or we can try to get a negotiation to resolve them in a manner that meets the aspirations of both societies."
If Mr. Obama takes us down this road by endorsing a Security Council resolution so profoundly injurious to Israel, we are all in for an even rougher ride than the past few months. In the forty years since President Richard Nixon's first veto in Israel's defense on September 10, 1972, every American president has used the veto to block anti-Israel resolutions at the UN Security Council. a total of 8 Presidents casting 42 vetoes in Israel's defense. (Even Jimmy Carter vetoed one, though he voted for another.) If Mr. Obama breaks with this tradition, he will be taking conflict with Israel to new heights.
A dozen leading House Democrats, all Jewish, have told deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes that Obama should stop acting as if only Israel is holding up the peace process while not expressing a word of disappointment about Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. One said, "You want us to go out and say the administration's got Israel's back [in the Iran negotiations]. How are you going to get us to say that when our constituents believe that the administration is stabbing Israel in the back?"
But up to now Mr. Obama seems to relish conflict with Israel while cozying up to Iran. A conflict at the UN might be next in line.
Steven J. Rosen is the director of The Washington Project at the Middle East Forum.

James Monroe

James Monroe
James Monroe, the fifth president of the United States, was born this day in 1758 in Westmoreland County, Virginia, the same county where George Washington was born. Some who knew the tall, dignified Monroe said that he reminded them of Washington. Thomas Jefferson reportedly declared, "Monroe was so honest that if you turned his soul inside out there would not be a spot on it."

The son of a planter, Monroe attended the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg but abandoned his studies to fight in the Revolutionary War. He was with Washington's army on Christmas night 1776 when it crossed the Delaware River to attack the Hessians at Trenton, New Jersey. As he led a charge against enemy cannon, a musket ball ripped into his shoulder, nearly killing him. When his wounds had healed, he went back to fighting for independence.

After the war, he studied law under Thomas Jefferson and embarked on a remarkable career. He served in the Virginia Assembly, the Continental Congress, the U.S. Senate, and twice as governor of Virginia. President Washington sent him to Paris as U.S. minister to France. Under President Jefferson, he helped negotiate the Louisiana Purchase and served as U.S. minister to Britain. President Madison thought so highly of Monroe that he appointed him to serve simultaneously as secretary of state and secretary of war.

Americans rewarded his tireless efforts with two terms in the White House, from 1817 to 1825. Today we most remember President Monroe for his 1823 declaration that the Western Hemisphere was off-limits to colonization by European powers. The United States would not try to seize colonial possessions, Monroe said, but it would also not permit any European nation to establish new colonies in the Americas. The Monroe Doctrine has been a pillar of American foreign policy ever since.
American History Parade
1758 James Monroe, the fifth U.S. president, is born in Westmoreland County, Virginia.
1788 Maryland becomes the seventh state to ratify the U.S. Constitution.
1817 The U.S. and Great Britain agree to limit naval forces in the Great Lakes region, providing for an unfortified U.S.-Canadian border.
1952 The U.S.'s post–World War II occupation of Japan ends.
1965 Fearing that Communists might gain power in the Dominican Republic, Lyndon Johnson sends U.S. forces to the island to help end civil war.
This content is courtesy of The American Patriot's Almanac

Court declares Vermont’s GM food labelling law constitutional

Court declares Vermont’s GM food labelling law constitutional


Victory for Vermont consumers
 

Court declares Vermont’s genetically engineered food labeling law constitutional

Centre for Food Safety, April 27 2015
http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/press-releases/3888/court-declares-vermonts-genetically-engineered-food-labeling-law-constitutional

Today, Center for Food Safety (CFS) hailed the just-issued federal court decision from the U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont affirming the constitutionality of Vermont’s genetically engineered food labeling law, Act 120. The ruling fully denied the preliminary injunction motion brought by the Grocery Manufacturer’s Association, Snack Food Association, and other plaintiffs to try and halt the law’s implementation, and granted the State of Vermont’s motion to dismiss on several claims.

“This important ruling affirms the constitutionality of genetically engineered food labeling, as well as the rights of Vermonters and U.S. citizens across the country,” said George Kimbrell, senior attorney for Center for Food Safety and counsel in the case. “Americans are demanding the right to know if their food is produced through genetic engineering, for health, environmental and many other reasons. This decision is a crucial step in protecting those rights.”

"What a victory for Vermont consumers," said Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group. "From the beginning, we have said that Vermonters have substantial interests in knowing whether their food has been genetically engineered. This ruling brings us one giant step closer to that reality."

Act 120 was signed into law on May 8, 2014. The Grocery Manufacturer’s Association (GMA), which represents the country’s largest food manufacturers and has poured tens of millions of dollars into anti-labeling campaigns in other states, sued Vermont just over a month after the bill was signed into law.

In the denying the Plaintiffs’ injunction, Judge Reiss declared, “Because the State has established that Act 120’s GE disclosure requirement is reasonably related to the State’s substantial interests, under Zauderer, Act 120’s GE disclosure requirement is constitutional.”

The Vermont law is scheduled to take effect in July 2016. Two other states, Connecticut and Maine, passed GE food labeling laws with effective dates contingent on other states passing similar legislation. Oregon also has a ballot initiative on GE labeling in November 2014.  There are currently 64 countries with labeling laws and 70 state bills were introduced in 2013-2014, in 30 different states.

CFS and the Vermont Public Interest Research Group are Amici in the case, represented by legal counsel from CFS and Vermont Law School’s Environmental & Natural Resources Law Clinic, and have litigated in support of the State and defending Act 120 since June 2014 (see for example, here and here). Prior to that, CFS advised the State and Vermont groups on the crafting of the legislation for several years leading up to the law’s passage last spring.  More broadly, CFS has led U.S. public interest efforts to secure the labeling of GE foods for nearly two decades, across the country.  In 2012-2014, CFS co-authored GE labeling ballot initiatives in California, Washington, and Oregon, which all narrowly lost.

Among other decisions, the 84-page ruling by the Court specifically:

*Denied the Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction;

*Granted the State of Vermont’s Motion to Dismiss on several grounds, including dismissing claims that Act 120 was preempted by Federal Law, and that Act 120 violated the Constitution’s Commerce Clause, and that the Plaintiffs’ 1st Amendment Claims were subject to strict scrutiny;

*Held in the State’s Favor on the remaining 1st Amendment claims, but did not dismiss the Plaintiffs’ complaint; and

*Ruled that the Plaintiffs were likely to prevail on Act 120’s prohibition on labeling GE food as “natural.”

GMA represents the country’s largest food manufacturers, which already label GE foods all over the world, but have forcefully fought efforts to label here in the U.S., including California, Washington, and Oregon. GMA has also supported a bill in Congress that would preempt states from pursuing labeling laws, even in the absence of a federal standard.
__________________________________________________________
Website: http://www.gmwatch.org
Profiles: http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/GM_Watch:_Portal
Twitter: http://twitter.com/GMWatch
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/GMWatch/276951472985?ref=nf

Ukraine official says Kiev is getting weapons from EU

Ukraine official says Kiev is getting weapons from EU

Ukraine is receiving weapons from some European Union countries, according to Ukraine's deputy head of the president's administration.
EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and Ukraine's President Petro Poroshenko
EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and Ukraine's President Petro Poroshenko
© AP/Scanpix
Valeriy Chaly said in an interview he could not disclose any details though, newsru.com reports.
In mid-March, Ukraine's President Petro Poroshenko mentioned that Kiev had concluded agreements with some EU countries on deliveries of lethal weapons.
"Are we receiving weapons from European countries? We are," Chaly said on ICTV channel.
"We cannot tell everything: what we are getting and from what countries," Chaly continued. "But trust me, this is happening. Some things get announced, others might be left off-screen."
The deputy chief of Ukrainian president's administration added that Kiev would like to see more "active" military and technological support from its partners.

Poroshenko: war might break any moment
During an international conference in Ukraine's support, President Poroshenko said on Tuesday that his country was still under the threat of war which could break out any moment.
"The threat of war is still hanging over us. It is our reality. War may erupt at any moment, but we are prepared to do everything we can to erase any possibility to doubt or retreat," Poroshenko was quoted by UNIAN.
"A solution to the situation in Donbass will be found with your assistance and with your solidarity with us."
He also said that truce agreements, concluded in Minsk in February, should be implemented in full with the coordination of Ukraine's partners.

Kentucky judge upholds Christian printer's refusal to print gay pride T-shirts

Kentucky judge upholds Christian printer's refusal to print gay pride T-shirts (+video)

The decision comes one day before Kentucky and three other states are set to argue at the US Supreme Court that state laws restricting marriage to one man and one woman should be upheld.


Judge rules in favor of business
WKYT - Lexington, KY
A state judge in Kentucky on Monday upheld the right of a printing company owned by devout Christians to refuse to produce T-shirts promoting a gay pride festival.
Circuit Judge James Ishmael reversed an October 2014 decision by a local human rights commission that found the company violated an anti-discrimination law when it declined to take an order for T-shirts from the Gay and Lesbian Services Organization (GLSO).
The judge cited both free speech and freedom of religion in ruling that the company did not discriminate when it declined to print T-shirts for an event promoting activities offensive to the owners’ religious beliefs.
“This court does not fault the Commission in its interest in insuring citizens have equal access to services but that is not what this case is all about,” Judge Ishmael said.
“There is no evidence in this record that [the company] or its owners refused to print the T-shirts in question based upon the sexual orientation of the GLSO or its members,” he said.
“Rather, it is clear beyond dispute that [the company] and its owners declined to print the T-shirts in question because of the MESSAGE advocating sexual activity outside of a marriage between one man and one woman.”
The state court decision comes one day before Kentucky and three other states are set to argue at the US Supreme Court that state laws restricting marriage to one man and one woman should be upheld.
Several friend-of-the-court briefs filed at the high court express concern that if it rules in favor of same-sex couples and invalidates traditional marriage laws across the country, religious conservatives who own small businesses will be forced to participate in same-sex weddings and other activities that they say offend their sincerely held religious beliefs.
A New Mexico photographer was found to have discriminated when she declined to photograph a same-sex couple’s commitment ceremony. She had cited her religious beliefs about marriage in declining the job.
A Colorado baker was cited for discrimination after he told a same-sex couple that he would sell them anything in his store, but would not produce a wedding cake for them. He said same-sex marriage offended his religious beliefs.
And a florist in Washington State was found to have discriminated against two gay men when she refused to arrange flowers for their wedding. The florist had sold flowers to one of the gay men for nine years, but she told her longtime customer that arranging flowers for the ceremony would involve her in an activity that her religion viewed as sacrilegious.
In each case, lawyers for religious business owners have sought to draw a distinction between selling existing products to people who happen to be gay or lesbian as part of a public accommodation versus engaging in expressive endeavors that promote activities they find religiously offensive.
In the Kentucky T-shirt case, an owner of the company, Hands On Originals, declined to accept an order for T-shirts promoting the 2012 Lexington Pride Festival because the event promoted sexual relationships and sexual activities outside of a marriage between one man and one woman.
The owner told a representative of the gay services group that he could not print the T-shirts because his company’s involvement in promoting the Pride Festival would disobey God.
Instead of filling the order, the owner offered to contact other local printing companies to do the work at the same price as Hands On Originals.
The gay services group was able to find another printer for the T-shirts. The group also filed a discrimination complaint against the company.
The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission took up the case and ruled that the company’s refusal to print the T-shirts was discrimination based on sexual orientation.
The commission also found that the local fairness ordinance did not violate free speech rights or rights to the free exercise of religion.
In reversing that determination, Ishmael said the commission’s conclusions were “in direct contrast to well-established precedent.”
Hands On Originals has a First Amendment right to refuse to print T-shirts bearing a message that it finds offensive, the judge said.
In addition, he ruled that the company and its owners enjoy a right to freely exercise their religion, which includes not facing government actions that substantially burden those rights. Ishmael said there was no showing of a compelling government interest that would justify forcing company officials to violate their religious beliefs.
The judge said GLSO was able to obtain its T-shirts from another firm at a substantially reduced price or, perhaps, for free.
“Hands On Originals and its owners have a sincerely held Christian belief that it is contrary to the Holy Bible for persons to engage in sexual activities outside of a marriage between one man and one woman,” Ishmael wrote. “The Pride Festival is without dispute a strong advocate for sexual relationships outside that principle.”
He said that rather than discriminating, the printing company had consistently followed its own policy of not printing offensive messages.
The judge noted that during a three-year period, the company had refused 13 orders, including for shirts promoting a strip club, pens promoting a sexually explicit video, and shirts containing a violent message.
“The government can’t force citizens to surrender free-speech rights or religious freedom in order to run a small business, and this decision affirms that,” said Jim Campbell, a lawyer with the group Alliance Defending Freedom, who argued the case on behalf of the company owners.
“The court rightly recognized that the law protects [the company’s] decision not to print shirts with messages that conflict with [the owners’] beliefs, and that no sufficient reason exists for the government to coerce [the owners] to act against [their] conscience in this way,” he said.
The case is Hands On Originals v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission (14-CI-04474).
'Religious Freedom' bill up for final vote Mon.
WRTV - Indianapolis, IN
Related Stories

In Stealth Move, Congress Backs Israeli Right's War on Settlement Boycotts

In Stealth Move, Congress Backs Israeli Right's War on Settlement Boycotts

The finance committees of the House and Senate have approved amendments to a trade bill that equate boycotts of West Bank settlement products with boycotts of Israel, strengthening efforts by the Israeli right to silence opponents of West Bank settlements. Both committees approved the amendments unanimously ... Most nations regard Israeli civilian settlements in the post-1967 territories as illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 ... This week's congressional committee measures appear to be the first-ever formal step toward U.S. government recognition of the settlements' legitimacy. None of the Capitol Hill sources contacted appeared to be aware of the explosive significance of the "territories under the control of Israel" clause.

David Cameron says Israel was right to defend itself over Gaza attacks last year

David Cameron says Israel was right to defend itself over Gaza attacks last year

independent.co.uk - The Prime Minister insisted it was "important to speak out" about standing by Israel and said there was an "important difference" between Israel's use of weapons to defend itself and Hamas' use of ...

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

What Will Happen To You When The Dollar Collapses?

Posted: 26 Apr 2015 09:34 AM PDT

Historically, when a nation's debt exceeds its ability to repay even the interest, it can be assumed that the currency will collapse. Typically, governments exacerbate the situation by printing large amounts of currency notes in an effort to inflate the problem away, or at least postpone it.
The greater the level of debt, the more dramatic the inflation must be to counter it. The more dramatic the inflation, the greater the danger that hyperinflation will take place. No government has ever been able to control hyperinflation. If it occurs, it does so quickly and always ends with a crash.
Although there are observers (myself included) who frequently discuss what a reserve-currency crash would mean to the world, there is little or no discussion as to how this would impact people on the street level, and perhaps that discussion should begin.
When currencies crash, the state often tries to float a new currency. Sometimes, it's accepted, sometimes not. Generally, the people of the country (and those trading within the country) move immediately to "the next best thing." In 2009, when the Zimbabwe dollar crashed, several currencies were used, but the US dollar was the clear favourite, as it was the world's reserve currency and therefore the most "spendable" currency.
Not surprisingly, the Zimbabwean government fought the use of the dollar, as they wanted to retain control of the economy and the people. People were therefore penalised for using the US dollar and other currencies.
And that's what most governments do, but here's where that idea usually falls down: First, the "black-market" currency is so desired by the now-jaded citizens that they do all they can to avoid the new official currency. Soon, most transactions, although illegal, are undertaken in the black-market currency. Second, since no one really wants the new currency, even the political leaders are soon using the black-market currency.
Ultimately, the black-market currency is legalised (since it's the only truly workable solution), and it often becomes the unofficial currency, if not actually the official one.
First, the Euro Crash
It's safe to say that the EU, the US, and quite a few other jurisdictions are nearing currency crashes, and in all likelihood, the euro will go before the dollar. So, unless the EU has already prearranged a new euro, the US dollar might well be chosen as an immediate solution to the problem, as the US dollar is presently recognised and traded throughout Europe. Therefore, a relatively painless transfer could be made.
Then, the Dollar Crash
However, the dollar, which is presently praised as being a sound currency, is really only sound in relation to the euro (and some other lesser currencies). Once its less stable brother, the euro, collapses, the dollar will be exposed.
As the US dollar is a fiat currency and is on the ropes, the US (and any other country that is using the dollar as its primary currency when the time comes) will experience a currency emergency at the street level that will be unprecedented.
The big question that is generally not being discussed is: The day after the crash (and thereafter), what will be the currency that is used to buy a bag of groceries, a tank of petrol, a meal at a restaurant? Certainly, the need will be immediate and will be on a national level in each impacted country, affecting everyone.
And Then...
I have discussed for some time that the US will be prepared ahead of time with a new, electronic currency. This will serve three purposes:
It will allow the US government to blame paper currencies for the crash, in order to distract the public from recognising that the government itself is the culprit.
It will allow the US government to create a currency system that disallows the holding of tradable currency by the population—that is, a debit card would be created by banks through which all transactions must pass, assuring that all transactions are processed by (and thereby subject to the control of) a bank.
It will allow the US government to have knowledge of every penny earned and spent by any individual or organization, allowing for direct-debit income taxation.
If the US does institute such a system, US citizens will then become the most economically controlled people in the world, overnight.
It's likely that a black-market system would spontaneously be created by US citizens in order to bypass the new government system. A portion of daily trade would occur under the table. It would unquestionably be made illegal, and we can only speculate as to how prevalent it would become: 10% of all transactions? 30%? Anyone's guess. Certainly, the government would crack down, and penalties might become severe.
Elsewhere in the world, there would be greater freedom, but what would their currencies be? There are many countries that presently use the US dollar as one of their official currencies. After a crash, the greater the link to the US dollar, the greater the loss of economic freedom, although, in most such countries, the government is likely to be less efficient than in the US, which would work in favour of the individual.
Such countries would also have the option of switching from the dollar to another dominant currency. With the euro and dollar gone, that currency might be the Chinese yuan. The difficulty with this possibility is that, presently, the yuan is not in common use on the street.
Adoption of a currency such as the yuan would require a sudden switch in monetary policy, complete with teething problems. However, recent developments amongst the BRICS and others indicate that many countries are already seeing the writing on the wall and are readying themselves for the use of the yuan as an alternate.
A Return to Precious Metals as Currency?
A further possibility is taking place in Mexico today. Mexico is remonetising silver. A one-ounce pure silver Libertad coin will function in parallel to (and be interchangeable with) the existing paper peso. Banks will value the Libertad daily, based upon the silver price. Thus, Mexico will create a legal way for its citizens to protect themselves against devaluation of the peso, whilst creating an internal protection against currency crashes in other countries.
If the Mexican government remains consistent in its plan, it will do more than simply help stabilise Mexico economically; it will serve as an example to other countries that when the Goliaths of the euro and US dollar fall, there is a very sound alternative.
Further, the more countries that follow this policy, the more silver (and for that matter, gold) would become an international currency. It would matter little to a petrol station owner in Canada, Australia, or Chile whether his till was filled with coins marked, "Mexico," or whether they said "Iceland," "New Zealand," or "South Africa." After all, an ounce of silver is an ounce of silver, no matter what the issuing country is.
As the Great Unravelling proceeds, we would be wise to monitor what happens with the Libertad in Mexico and watch for a similar return to precious metals in other jurisdictions. As this development progresses, we might wish to consider that, whatever jurisdictions are the most forceful in demanding the continued use of doomed paper currencies (or, worse, transferring into electronic currencies), we may choose to store our wealth, no matter how great or small, in a safer jurisdiction. Further, we may choose to reside in a jurisdiction where a currency crisis will be less likely to occur; to live under a government that does not seek to monitor and tax our every economic transaction.
Source

U.S. Special Forces Operate in more than 80 Countries

Posted: 25 Apr 2015 10:00 PM PDT
The reach of the U.S. military is virtually endless, with nearly every nation on earth having some kind of American armed forces presence. The commander of the U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) has said that in 80 of those countries there are now Special Forces troops. The U.S. Special Forces are a kind of army within an army. There are about 69,000 sailors, soldiers, airmen and Marines in the Special Operations Forces (SOF), which operate as part of USSOCOM under Army General Joseph Votel.

Police ‘Coup’ Prevents Newly-Elected St. Louis Area Mayor From Taking Office

Posted: 25 Apr 2015 10:00 PM PDT
Mayor Betty McCray was recently elected to the office of mayor in the St. Louis County city of Kinloch. But in spite of the fact that the St. Louis County Board of Elections have certified the election results, the local police turned out by the dozen to block her from entering city hall and beginning her work as mayor. Nearly two dozen police officers greeted McCray on her first day of work, as she tried to enter city hall.

Russia to tighten ban on European fruit imports

Posted: 27 Apr 2015 02:56 PM PDT

The Kremlin says it will tighten an existing ban on the import of fruits and vegetables from Europe through Bulgaria over concerns that Sofia may be attempting to send European products into Russia using false documents.
On Monday, the deputy head of Russia's agricultural regulator, Yulia Shvabauskene, said Moscow had stopped re-exports, or the export of goods which have been imported, through Bulgaria.
Shvabauskene said Russia suspects companies in Bulgaria of using false documents to bypass the ban by labeling products from Europe as coming from countries not affected by the ban, such as China, Brazil and Morocco.
The official added that the restriction on re-exports through Bulgaria is "just the start" and that Moscow was "examining the option of not accepting any European re-export certificates at all."
Russia blocked most food imports from the United States and countries within the European Union in response to Western sanctions against the country.
The Western powers imposed sanctions against Russia over accusations that Moscow instigated a deadly crisis in neighboring Ukraine, which broke out when Kiev launched military operations to crack down on pro-Russians in eastern Ukraine last year. Russia has denied the allegations.
Prior to the food ban, Russia received a quarter of its produce from the EU nations.
Source

US Administration Releases Heavily Censored Version of Secret Report Casting Doubt on L&E of Bush’s Warrantless Spying

Posted: 26 Apr 2015 10:00 PM PDT
After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the George W. Bush administration ordered the National Security Agency (NSA) to ignore the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 by beginning the secret warrantless surveillance of international phone calls, emails and data without going through the Judicial Branch of government. This surveillance evolved into a program called Stellarwind. Now, newly declassified documents show that the data obtained from Stellarwind was so secret that it was not useful in tracking terrorists.

What Happened to $1.3 Billion of Taxpayer Money Sent Directly to U.S. Military Officers in Afghanistan?

Posted: 26 Apr 2015 10:00 PM PDT
The Department of Defense (DOD) refuses to detail what it did with $1.3 billion that was supposed to be used on urgent humanitarian and reconstruction projects. A report (pdf) from Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction (SIGAR) John Sopko pointed out that $2.26 billion had been put into the Commander's Emergency Response Program (CERP). That funding is meant to be used primarily for small projects estimated to cost less than $500,000 involving such issues as transportation, electricity and education. This year, most of the money will be used for condolence payments when civilians are killed or injured or property is damaged by U.S. forces and to increase security for communities that happen to be located near active U.S. military bases.

Russia Deploys Tactical Drones In The Arctic, Exposes Rarely-Seen US Spy Satellite Images

Posted: 26 Apr 2015 10:00 PM PDT
While the USA is busy killing US civilians and terrorists with its drone program, Russia is set to deploy its own Orlan-10 drones in the oil- and gas-rich Arctic region (reportedly to monitor the climate situation). As SputnikNews reports, Colonel Aleksandr Gordeev stated "the drones' task is to maintain impartial control of the situation in the Russian sector of the Arctic, including the ecological and ice situation in the adjoining sea areas and along the Northern Sea Route." So, passive-agressive? However, Russia also chose this week to release rarely-seen images of a US intelligence satellite which as one analyst notes is provocative (but obscure in its intent other than the growing recognition of US space-based surveillance assets).

The Unexplained Connection Between the FBI and Two Muslim Friends Killed by Law Enforcement

Posted: 26 Apr 2015 10:00 PM PDT
As the penalty phase of the trial of convicted Boston Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev winds down, one key question remains unresolved: what exactly was the FBI's relationship with his older brother Tamerlan before the bombings?

The Supreme Court Stole Your Right to CHECK the FEDS POWER

Posted: 26 Apr 2015 10:00 PM PDT
A Supreme court clerk shown practicing a highly specialized listening technique developed by the court for oral argument. Couples counselors have successfully brought many of these same techniques to their clients. What do you call a situation where the law is ignored? Tyranny. What about where the law is turned on its head? Fraud.

Texas: “Undetermined Amount of Explosives” Reported Missing from Halliburton

Posted: 26 Apr 2015 10:00 PM PDT
A report of missing explosives was made to Odessa Police on Thursday morning. Odessa Police tell NewsWest 9, the Odessa Police Department Bomb Squad Unit was made aware of an undetermined amount of explosives that were reported missing from Halliburton.

Baltimore Police Caught On Video Beating and Arresting Reporters During Protests

Posted: 26 Apr 2015 10:00 PM PDT
The mainstream media wasn't particularly interested in covering the massive protests in Baltimore last Saturday. But once they heard about isolated incidences of violence at the rallies demanding "Justice for Freddie Gray" the began scrambling to hone in, while ignoring the rampant police brutality at the same marches. Outside of the local area, the media has been silent on the police on the scene beating and arresting journalists, after first attempting to stop them from recording.

7 whistleblowers facing more jail time than [traitor] Gen. Petraeus

Posted: 26 Apr 2015 10:00 PM PDT
The administration of President Barack Obama once promised to be "the most transparent administration" of all time. Instead, Obama's Department of Justice has led the most targeted campaign against whistleblowers of any president ever, charging more government employees under the Espionage Act than all previous presidents combined—almost all of whom sit in prison serving sentences up to 30 years.

Colombia Ministry of Health recommends immediate ban on Roundup spraying of coca crops

Colombia Ministry of Health recommends immediate ban on Roundup spraying of coca crops


US/Colombia government spray programme is risk to health, says Ministry
 
Colombia’s Ministry of Health and Social Protection on 27 April recommended a ban on the aerial spraying of glyphosate herbicides (such as Roundup) to eradicate illicit crops in the country, due to the negative effects the chemical can cause to the health of local inhabitants.

In a statement, the Health Ministry argued that "under its protection obligations and in accord with the orders issued by the Constitutional Court”, it is urging the authorities not to continue using the herbicide. According to the Ministry, there should be a  "immediate” suspension of “glyphosate use in aerial spraying to eradicate illicit crops" because it represents "an unavoidable danger of possible adverse effects to health".

The Program for the Eradication of Illicit Crops by aerial spraying with the herbicide glyphosate (PECIG) has been a strategy of the governments of Colombia and the United States since 1994. It seeks to control coca plantations in several regions of the country.

The recommendation was made just hours after the US Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, William Brownfield, defended the use of glyphosate and gave assurances in an interview with the local radio station Caracol Radio that the herbicide does not cause cancer as indicated by the WHO. Newspaper reports claim that Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos will order in the next hours the suspension of use of the chemical.


Source (Spanish): http://www.elcomercio.com/actualidad/glifosato-aspersion-cultivos-coca-colombia.html
__________________________________________________________
Website: http://www.gmwatch.org
Profiles: http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/GM_Watch:_Portal
Twitter: http://twitter.com/GMWatch
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/GMWatch/276951472985?ref=nf