Gas Theft and Auschwitz Snub… Russia’s Every Right to End the Insults
How
many insults does the European Union expect Russia to bear without
consequences? Ethnic cleansing of Russian people by the Brussels-backed
Kiev regime, a refugee crisis on Russia’s borders, economic sanctions
based on groundless accusations hurting Russian society – and now this –
the neo-Nazi cabal [ sic ! ] that seized power in Ukraine with CIA
backing last year has repeatedly been found guilty of siphoning off
Russia’s natural gas exports to the EU.
On
top of all that comes the insult of Russian President Vladimir Putin
not being invited along with European leaders to attend the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. More on that in a while.
But
first on the issue of natural exports. Russia this week finally
responded to the Kiev regime’s incorrigible banditry by giving notice
that it is to cut off all gas supplies that transit through Ukraine –
which make up about 40-50 per cent of the EU’s supply. In the middle of
winter and with temperatures plummeting the move by Russian state-owned
Gazprom has reportedly sent Brussels officials into panic mode.
No
doubt the dutiful Western corporate media will crank up the «Putin as
arch villain» narrative. Families freezing across Europe will be
attributed to the «evil genius» of the «Soviet mastermind».
Maros
Sefcovic, European Commission vice president for energy, said the
decision by Gazprom to turn off the gas taps will damage Russia’s
reputation as an international supplier. His admonition echoes earlier
calls by Europe’s energy commissioner Gunther Oettinger who appealed to
Russia not to «politicise» energy trade.
That’s
ironic humour for you. Russia has not politicised anything; it is the
Brussels bureaucracy, along with their American cohorts, who have sought
to politicise everything – and to give Moscow impossible room for
manoeuvre.
Gazprom’s
chief executive Alexei Miller this week reminded international media
that Russia has been a reliable supplier of natural gas to Europe for
the past four decades – even during the West’s aggressive Cold War.
Besides,
the objective of Russia’s latest gas cut-off is not to end the trade
with Europe. Russia is planning to route future supplies to the EU
through Turkey. As Miller pointed out, it is up to the EU to now build
the necessary infrastructure to take the gas supplies from the Turkish
border into Greece and beyond.
Russia’s
objective is simply this: to put an end to the Kiev regime’s de facto
theft of Russian gas exports to Europe. How much more reasonable can
that be?
We
can imagine how Britain would react if Scotland decided to with-hold
North Sea oil supplies transiting its territory. Or how France would
respond if its wine exports were being hijacked en route by some third
party. Or the US if Mexico were found to be surreptitiously dipping into
its exports to the rest of South America.
It’s
an absurd complaint by EU officials and governments to now accuse
Russia of «energy blackmail». After all, it was Brussels that put the
kibosh on Russia’s South Stream gas project via the Black Sea last year,
thus, in effect, squeezing Russia to fall back on the Ukrainian transit
route. That route has, as noted, become infeasible due to the Kiev
regime’s incessant and illegal siphoning off of Russian exports.
So
what does the EU want Russia to do? Keep giving gas handouts to the
Kiev mafia-regime that refuses to pay for its own gas supplies and which
is bombing and killing ethnic Russians in the eastern Ukrainian
regions?
Russia
has every right to take measures to protect its vital economic
interests. An alternative pipeline through Turkey will provide a
southern arc complimentary to the existing Nord Stream Russian gas
supply route via the Baltic Sea into Germany. It is therefore ridiculous
to accuse Russia of cutting off gas supplies to the EU. Russia is
merely cutting off illegal interference in its exports by a third party –
the Kiev Reich.
Admittedly,
entailed is a critical supply problem this winter for the EU until the
Turkish route is implemented. But that’s not Russia’s problem; it is
Brussels’ problem for having blocked the construction of the South
Stream project and for its relentless indulgence of the Kiev regime,
with all its criminality.
In
any case, complaints from the EU that Russia is damaging its reputation
as an international energy supplier ring hollow. Russia has found a
ready alternative market for its gas exports with China after Vladimir
Putin and Xi Jinping signed a $400 billion record deal last year. The
Asian market for Russia’s prodigious energy resources is projected to
overshadow the EU market. Moreover, the Moscow-Beijing partnership is to
be financed with roubles and yen, which relieves Russia and China of
artificial dependence on the US dollar or Euro.
It
seems the height of European conceit to lecture Russia about trade
ethics, when the former has imposed a gratuitous embargo on Moscow over
baseless accusations of interfering in Ukraine. It is the EU elite and
their Washington ally who have been systematically interfering in
Ukraine and provoking a war of aggression on the eastern regions – with a
death toll of nearly 5,000 over the past year and up to one million
refugees. If international law and morality were adhered to, it is
Brussels and Washington that should be sanctioned, if not prosecuted for
the criminality they have unleashed in the form of the Kiev regime.
Europe’s
hypocrisy and double think are underscored with France’s ongoing
unilateral abrogation of the deal it had with Russia for the supply of
two warships. Russia has paid France over $1 billion already for the
delivery of the Mistral class vessels; yet Paris refuses to honour the
contract. A less polite but not inaccurate way to describe this French
misconduct is state-sponsored «piracy».
Washington
is reportedly breathing down the French government’s neck to not relent
on its shameless scuppering of the Russian Mistral contract. Which
makes the damage to French «reputation» all the more injurious. Not only
is France not be trusted as an international trading partner; its
«sovereign independence» is also evidently at the mercy of Washington’s
bullying. How can anyone trust the French government to honour anything
in the light of this craven kowtowing?
But
here’s the coup de grace for European insolence towards Russia: French
President Francois Hollande and his German counterpart Joachim Gauck
will be among other European leaders to attend the 70th anniversary of
the liberation of the Nazi death camp Auschwitz later this month. The
ceremony will be led by Polish President Bronislaw Komorowski.
An
official invitation was reportedly not sent to Moscow, and Vladimir
Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov said this week that the Russian
president would not be attending the Auschwitz event, as a result.
In
January 1945, it was the Russian Red Army that liberated the death camp
– which has since come to symbolise the crimes of Nazi Germany and
European fascism generally. Russian troops liberated thousands of Poles,
Jews and other European nationals from imminent death at Auschwitz,
where over one million had already perished. The French Vichy regime
collaborated with Nazi Germany to send hundreds of thousands to their
death at Auschwitz and other extermination centres.
Seventy
years on, Russia is being snubbed over perhaps its most heroic
contribution to Europe – the defeat of fascist Germany and its mass
extermination programs.
It
is astounding how relatively quickly European history is in effect
being re-written – and by countries that were perpetrators of the
horrors of World War II.
But
should we be surprised? Russia saved Europe’s neck from fascism and
continues to save Europe’s neck from freezing every winter with its
natural gas supplies. And yet for all this, Russia has to endure insults
and provocations from a thankless European elite.
It’s
time that there were consequences for such hideous, purblind European
arrogance. Russia can legitimately take her generous bounties elsewhere
in the world – and let the incorrigible ingrates freeze if they want to!
|
No comments:
Post a Comment