Israeli army temporarily halts use of attack dogs in West Bank
Inquiry
into incident in which a Palestinian youth was bitten by a dog while
being arrested finds that the arrest could have been carried out using
other means.
By Gili Cohen | Mar. 5, 2015 | 6:56 PM
submit to reddit
The
use of attack dogs by the Israel Defense Forces in the West Bank has
been provisionally halted, following an investigation which found that a
dog was unnecessarily used to arrest a Palestinian youth.
IDF
Judea and Samaria Division Commander Brigadier Tamir Yadai ordered the
halt on Thursday. It will continue until the protocol for the use of
dogs is reviewed and practiced.
Hamzeh
Abu Hashem, 16, of Beit Umar, was arrested about two months by soldiers
and a dog from the IDF's Oketz canine unit. A video of the incident
shows the dog biting the youth and a soldier saying, "Who's a chicken,
eh? Who's a chicken? Great. Very good." Another soldier is heard telling
the dog to "get him."
Hashem, who required medical treatment, has been in detention since the incident, accused of throwing stones at the soldiers.
The
IDF investigation found that while the use of dogs in confrontations
could be justified, in the case in question, the youth could have been
arrested using other means.
The
IDF decided in 2012 to stop using attack dogs for the purpose of
dispersing protests, but they are sometimes still used in ambushes.
The findings of the investigation were submitted to Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon and Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot on Thursday.
Yadai
also decided that the operational use of dogs in the West Bank will
require the consent of brigade-level commanders or higher.
The investigation found that the use of dogs against stone throwers and
those who disturb the peace was contrary to the mission as defined by
the brigade commander.
"We are talking about a serious incident in which the use of dogs
indicates a low level of professionalism," Brigadier Yadai said. "It
involved a faulty understanding of the potential for damage and
inappropriate ethical standards of behavior."
"We,
his mother and I, watched the video, and we couldn't believe what we
were seeing," the boy's father, Ahmed Abu Hashem, recalled. "My wife
almost fainted. I don't know if there's a mother or father in the world
who can be indifferent to such pictures. It pained us very much,
especially the fact that the boy was helpless and the soldiers rejoiced
over him."
A
senior officer serving in the territories said after the incident that
the soldiers were engaged in a pre-approved ambush to catch firebomb
throwers. He asserted that sending the dog was justified, and that it
was a "measured step with a low risk of causing irreparable harm
relative to shooting."
He added, however, that the unit's behavior after the incident was unacceptable.
No comments:
Post a Comment