Five Laws to Repeal on Independence Day [interesting!]

Five Laws to Repeal on Independence Day

July 4, 2015 — Ryan McMaken

Unfortunately, Independence Day has become a day for many to celebrate the United States government. But the actual historical event behind the day — the adoption of the Declaration of Independence by the Second Continental Congress — was an illegal act of political defiance that led to secession and the overthrow of an entire system of government well entrenched on American shores.

Moreover, it is quite anachronistic to connect the modern unified nation-state known as “the United States” to this event, nor does it make sense to invoke anything having to do with the Constitution of 1787.

Indeed, as Jeffrey Rogers Hummel has pointed out, the Constitution we now labor under represents a counter-revolution against the Spirit of 1776. The Spirit of 1787, in contrast, was about taking what the Declaration of Independence repeatedly refers to in the plural as “free and independent states” and hammering them into one unified state.

Fortunately, the Federalists — the now benighted and so-called “founding fathers” — partially failed and were beaten back by the anti-Federalists who demanded a Bill of Rights — the only laissez-faire portion of the Constitution — which temporarily crippled the centralizing efforts of the Federalists.

But just as the Constitution itself is contrary to what is celebrated on Independence Day, we can also look to several Acts of Congress since 1787 that have perhaps done some of the most damage in undoing what the revolutionaries had intended.

The Judiciary Act of 1789

Unknown to many, the entire federal court system outside the Supreme Court stems from this one law adopted during the first session of Congress. At the time, there was fierce opposition from many in the United States who recognized that a federal system of courts would allow for the extension of federal law nationwide and into the allegedly independent states themselves. The act created the office of the Attorney General and the appellate system of courts which today allows the Supreme Court to exercise appellate jurisdiction over pretty much every aspect of life inside the United States. Without these courts, the Supreme Court would be limited to its few areas of original jurisdiction. Thus, without the federal court system, there would be no federal court system through which to regulate things such as drug prohibition, marriage, abortion, wages, and the whole panoply of the modern federal regulatory state.

The Louisiana Purchase Treaty

Thomas Jefferson announced the signing of the Louisiana Purchase Treaty on July 4, 1803. Jefferson considered the Purchase to be a great victory for his un-ironically named “Empire of Liberty” scheme in which the United States would spread “liberty” by force across North America.

The Louisiana Purchase would have far reaching effects on the entire nature of the American confederation and on constitutional law. Direct Congressional control over lands in the west had always been a dream of nationalists and centralizers, and the Louisiana Purchase gave the US government access to vast new resources beyond the control of any state. Defense of these federal lands necessitated an expansion of a federal military force, and required a much larger apparatus of federal law to administer the lands.

Moreover, these new federal lands created the impression for many that the states were created out of federal lands, instead of federal powers being granted to the central government by states. The later claim by anti-secessionists that the federal government created the states, and not vice versa, owes much to the Louisiana Purchase, and to this day, the federal government directly controls and owns over 50 percent of the land in most Western states.

The Militia Act of 1903

Prior to the adoption of the Militia Act, the law was ambiguous about how the federal government could seize control of state militias for use in the federal government’s wars. Some states resisted use of their troops in the invasion of Canada during the War of 1812, for example, and federal politicians faced the onerous task of convincing state governments to offer up state militias for national military service.

Political realities meant that state governments were often more than happy to oblige of course, but there nevertheless remained the risk that the states could offer real and meaningful resistance to unpopular wars by withholding military support. Naturally, this was very inconvenient for the federal government, so in the name of repelling foreign bogeymen and enhancing “efficiency,” the armed forces of the United States were unified, allowing presidents to seize control of state militias whenever he liked. Today, the militias have been replaced by the adjuncts of the federal military known as the “National Guard.”

The Revenue Act of 1913

In 1913, the US Constitution was amended to allow Congress to levy personal income taxes. The amendment does not mandate an income tax, however, so later that year, Congress passed enabling legislation creating the income tax we know today. Since then, federal budgets have ballooned, tax burdens have swelled, and it is now simply accepted that the federal government should be able to examine every aspect of your financial life to make sure you’re paying “what you owe.” Financial privacy is now only a distant memory.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913

While the United States had had central banks before, the Federal Reserve, created in 1913, is by far the most enduring and most powerful. Over the years, the Fed has become a behemoth that does everything from regulating the financial system to monetizing the debt to creating never-ending liquidity for