Further evidence The Independent may be colluding with GCHQ
by Paul Woodward on August 24, 2013
A
report in The Independent yesterday included this line in reference to a
GCHQ project (the construction of a major surveillance center in the
Middle East):
Information about the project was contained in 50,000 GCHQ documents that Mr Snowden downloaded during 2012.
Since
Edward Snowden issued a statement making it clear that he was not a
source for this report, the claim that he obtained 50,000 GCHQ documents
(a claim that has not previously been reported) begs two questions:
1. Who is the source of this claim?
2. Is the claim factually correct?
Given
that the report says nothing whatsoever about its sourcing, but does
include, “The Government claims…,” we can at least conclude that The
Independent‘s reporters were speaking to British government officials,
most likely inside GCHQ itself.
So how would GCHQ “know” that
Snowden downloaded 50,000 GCHQ documents? It’s possible that David
Miranda was carrying the whole trove of leaked documents on the laptop
that was confiscated from him by British police when he detained in
Heathrow airport last weekend. But I’m inclined to doubt that these
documents are now being carried around anywhere by anyone unless that is
absolutely necessary.
Back in July, Bloomberg reported that NSA
chief Keith Alexander “said the NSA has determined which files Snowden
took and said they amounted to a lot of information, though he wouldn’t
say how much.”
So, the NSA must have informed GCHQ. Right? Not so fast.
The Associated Press now reports:
The U.S. government’s efforts to determine which highly classified
materials leaker Edward Snowden took from the National Security Agency
have been frustrated by Snowden’s sophisticated efforts to cover his
digital trail by deleting or bypassing electronic logs, government
officials told The Associated Press. Such logs would have showed what
information Snowden viewed or downloaded.
The government’s
forensic investigation is wrestling with Snowden’s apparent ability to
defeat safeguards established to monitor and deter people looking at
information without proper permission, said the officials, who spoke on
condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the
sensitive developments publicly.
And those 50,000 documents?
That’s probably GCHQ fishing for information, feeding a line to a
journalist who doesn’t care too much whether it’s true, and then waiting
to see whether Glenn Greenwald or Snowden bites the bait and divulges
more information about what documents did or did not get leaked.
- See more at: http://warincontext.org/2013/08/24/further-evidence-the-independent-may-be-colluding-with-gchq/#sthash.XFCWv468.dpuf
Saturday, August 24, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment