Avoiding facts? MSM uncertain who is behind deadly Odessa blaze
by alethoRT | May 4, 2014
Despite clear evidence that the pro-Kiev radicals set Odessa’s House of Trade Unions ablaze on Friday killing dozens, the mainstream media is being ambiguous about the causes of the tragedy.
On Friday,
Ukraine’s eastern town of Odessa saw brutal street battles between
pro-autonomy activists and nationalist radicals which left 46 people
dead. The majority of the victims died in the Trade Unions House that
was set on fire by pro-Kiev radicals.
Very
carefully worded commentary on the tragedy in Odessa came from the
mainstream Western media, as if they were trying to avoid assigning the
blame to those who actually set the building on fire. Their coverage of
the event was heavily reliant on statements from Kiev that blamed the
violence on pro-autonomy activists, as well as witness accounts given by
the nationalist Right Sector members.
Based on their reports, it may seem that the House of Trade Unions just caught fire.
“At
some stage yesterday – and it still unclear exactly how this started –
but there were rival pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian protests here. It led
to fierce street clashes, which culminated in a huge fire in a building
last night,” reported Sky News.
“Violence
is escalating in Ukraine. Police in normally calm Odessa say a clash
between pro-Russians and government supporters led to a fire that killed
at least 31 people,” said a report by Fox News.
But
the actual video footage from the scene of the incident clearly shows
how pro-Kiev radicals are throwing Molotov cocktails into the Trade
Unions House where pro-autonomy activists were trapped.
Asked by the Washington Post
who had thrown Molotov cocktails, a pro-Ukrainian activist Diana Berg
admitted “Our people — but now they are helping them to escape the
building.”
The BBC
website merely quoted the regional office of Ukraine's Interior
Ministry, writing that “it did not give details of how the blaze
started,” stressing that “the exact sequence of events is still
unclear.”
Reuters
news agency reported that “a pro-Kiev march was ambushed, petrol bombs,
stones, explosive devices were thrown, police soon lost control and the
building was later set on fire.”
CNN
covered the incident by stating that it was “unclear exactly what may
have caused it [the fire].” Later, however, the channel acknowledged the fire was started by Kiev supporters throwing Molotov cocktails at the building.
The New York Times
goes with the headline: ‘Ukraine Presses Pro-Russia Militants After
Fighting Spreads to a Port City.’ The words “pro-Russian militants”
could create the impression that those were not just ordinary people and
anti-Kiev demonstrators trapped inside a burning building, but
militants. And that kind of wording can almost justify the act of
killing, notes RT’s Gayane Chichakyan.
The Guardian
quotes a member of extreme-right nationalist group Right Sector as
saying "The aim is to completely clear Odessa [of pro-Russians]… They
are all paid Russian separatists.”
Such
statements - be they from Right Sector, or the coup-imposed government -
perpetuates a narrative that whoever opposes the Kiev authority and
feels strong ties with Russia is simply a puppet of Moscow. And this
narrative is just perfectly in line with how the US and European
officials see the situation. They have firmly sided themselves with the
authorities in Kiev and are ready to justify and defend whatever action
Kiev takes against the protesters, says Chichakyan.

No comments:
Post a Comment