The Gay Courier has been established to provide news, information and info on, from and about the gay community, and other social events and happenings from around the world, from all sorts of sources, to all who are interested in this news, information and info!
The postings are as is, and all copyrights and or ownerships are and remain with the original copyright-holder and or owner!
Search This Blog
Saturday, February 13, 2016
Tennis umpire was allowed to work at US Open despite betting offences ban [or how flawed the security at USopen tournaments is!]
Tennis umpire was allowed to work at US Open despite betting offences ban
• Denis Pitner banned for a year in August 2015 over accessing betting account
• USTA ‘shocked’ to find it failed to withdraw credential for Croat to officiate
The tennis umpire Denis Pitner at Wimbledon in 2011, taken from the Croat’s Facebook page.
Photograph: Facebook
An umpire secretly banned for a year for betting offences by the
tennis authorities was immediately allowed to work at some of the
world’s biggest tournaments, the Guardian can reveal.
The Croat Denis Pitner, who was suspended
in August after regularly logging on to a betting account from which
bets were placed on matches, was a line judge at both the US Open, one
of tennis’s four grand slam events, later the same month and also at an
ATP world tour event in Doha last month, featuring Novak Djokovic and
Rafael Nadal. A photograph of Pitner sunning himself in Qatar remains on
his Facebook page.
The United States Tennis
Association, which runs the US Open, said it was “shocked” to be told
the news by the Guardian – and blamed the mistake on a flaw in their
processes and Pitner being placed on the banned list just one day before
the grand slam tournament started on 25 August.
A spokesman told the Guardian: “After learning within the last 24
hours that an official on the ‘do not credential’ list may have worked
at the 2015 US Open as a linesman, the USTA immediately investigated the
claim. The USTA was shocked to find that this was in fact the case.
“As we have now determined, Denis Pitner had been approved to work
the US Open as a linesman on 13 July. The USTA was notified that Mr
Pitner was placed on the ‘do not credential’ list on 24 August. Mr
Pitner had already picked up his credential prior to the USTA being
notified. Due to a flaw in our process, which we are investigating now,
Mr Pitner’s credential was not cancelled. For this reason, he did work
as a linesman at the 2015 US Open.”
Advertisement
The
USTA spokesman confirmed that Pitner had worked in the qualifiers and
then the main draw at the US Open through to Thursday 10 September. He
also insisted that the mistake would be urgently investigated, adding:
“The USTA takes this matter extremely seriously and has made the
investigation of what caused the error its highest priority. We will
also work with the newly created independent review panel to ensure
instances such as this are not repeated in the future.”
The ATP, which runs men’s tennis, blamed a “breach in procedures” for
Pitner being allowed to work in Doha. A spokesman confirmed it would
also review the issue to ensure it did not happen again.
During his ban Pitner also worked as a chair umpire at the ITF Super
Seniors team championships in Croatia, an amateur tournament for players
over 70, held under the auspices of the Croatian Tennis Federation in
September. An ITF spokeswoman said: “The Croatian Federation was
informed in August of his suspension. As with the USTA and ATP, we are
looking into ways to ensure that this does not happen again.”
This latest news will heap yet more embarrassment on tennis
authorities, following a Guardian investigation that earlier this week revealed that four umpires had been secretly suspended
for allegedly taking bribes from betting syndicates. Another umpire,
Kirill Parfenov from Kazakhstan, was also secretly banned for life in
February 2015 for contacting another official on Facebook in an attempt
to manipulate the scoring of matches.
In both the Parfenov and Pitner cases, the tennis authorities never
publicly released details, alerting only a small number of tournament
directors and national tennis federations.
This latest news will also raise fresh questions about transparency
levels in tennis. Earlier this week the ITF said that Pitner had been
suspended in early August yet it appears that it took around three weeks
for the Croat to be put on the banned list, on 24 August. The Guardian
has been unable to find an adequate reason for the delay.
It also caps a bad few weeks for the sport, following the BBC and BuzzFeed allegation before the Australian Open that the tennis authorities had not done enough to investigate match fixing in the sport.
Tennis authorities insisted on Friday that the independent review
into the integrity of the game – which was announced at the Australian
Open last month – would “thoroughly investigate allegations of
corruption in international professional tennis and the effectiveness of
existing anti-corruption practices and procedures”. The International
Tennis Federation, the grand slam board and the men’s and women’s
associations also boldly promised to implement all its recommendations.
Tennis umpires’ gambling scam explained - video
The review, which is expected to take at least a year, will look into
match-fixing allegations as well as the banning of two umpires on the
Futures Tour for corruption. It will be undertaken by a three-person
panel, led by Adam Lewis QC, which will have the right to demand the
production of documents and other information, and be able to consult
with law enforcement agencies, betting operators and other relevant
organisations.
The statement from the ITF, the ATP, the WTA and the grand slam board
said: “The independent review panel will review the effectiveness and
appropriateness of the tennis anti-corruption programme, the tennis
integrity unit and the tennis integrity protection programme and
recommend any suggested changes.”
“The governing bodies of international tennis will publish this
document and have committed to fund and implement all of the IRP’s
recommendations.”
No comments:
Post a Comment