Search This Blog

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Two excellent articles from the Russian media on the gay Stoli boycott

Two excellent articles from the Russian media on the gay Stoli boycott

7/31/2013 1:24pm by
 
I  just read two surprisingly good articles on the gay boycott of Russia, and particularly vodka (especially Stolichnaya), by RIA Novosti, a state-owned news agency in, of all places, Russia.
The first is about the gay boycott of vodka/Stoli generally, and the second is about Stolichnaya’s odd effort to distance itself from its Russian roots (ties the company has been bragging about for years).
As you likely know, Russia is facing a growing international boycott over the Putin government’s brutal crackdown on gay and Trans people in the country.  A new law was recently passed in Russia banning anything pro-gay – including speech, or even clothing (they actually arrested someone for wearing rainbow suspenders).  Concomitant with the new law, violence against gay and Trans people in the country has increased markedly, and many think the violence is either condoned, or even fomented, by the Russian authorities.
Things have gotten so bad in the country that there are now anti-gay gangs who go on to gay social media sites in order to lure young gay teens who are then kidnapped and beaten, on camera.  The film is then published on a Russian social media site.  And even though the perpetrators’ faces, and town, are clearly evident, the Russian authorities reportedly don’t lift a finger to stop it.
Russian vigilantes show off a young gay boy they claim to have abducted and then doused with urine after entrapping him via a gay social media site.
Russian vigilantes show off a young gay boy they claim to have abducted and then doused with urine after entrapping him via a gay social media site.
As a result of the culture of lawlessness now increasingly gripping Russia, concerns have skyrocketed about the safety of Olympic athletes and guests during next year’s Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia.  Just yesterday, a Russian lawmaker said that Olympic athletes and visitors would be subject to arrest under the Draconian new law.  And we now know they’ll also be subject to Russia’s new anti-gay vigilante “police” as well.
Russian vigilantes kidnap and attack a young gay Russian they first stalked on a local social media site.
Russian vigilantes kidnap and attack a young gay Russian they first stalked on a local social media site.
Back to RIA Novosti and the two articles I mention above.  I realize that my praise might get some RIA Novosti reporter sent to a gulag, but I’m seriously impressed at how fair, and professional, their journalists are being with this topic.
It wasn’t long ago that Russian state-run media was part of the larger Soviet propaganda machine.  And they were vicious liars.  I’ve often felt that Fox News in the US, and the larger right-wing noise machine in our country, copied, intentionally or not, the Soviet model.
The Soviets were expert at building a huge network of disinformation operatives, and then using that network to turns lies into truth.  One favorite tactic of the Sovs was to get a little-known paper in, say, Africa to write some absurd lie about the West (that we were harvesting the organs of children was always a favorite), then Pravda or Radio Moscow back in the motherland would repeat the story, and simply cite the African newspaper as the source.  After all, the state-run Soviet press wasn’t actually lying - it was a real story, in Africa - and the Soviet media was simply repeating someone else’s news, thus giving the lie a veneer of credibility and authenticity.  The Soviets really did excel at evil.'
Then there’s the publication and network “Russia Today,” which recently changed its name to RT (I suspect in order to hide the word “Russia” from its title).  Russia Today excels at hating America.  Anyone familiar with Soviet propaganda techniques will recognize the familiar stench of the old ways in RT’s new reportage.  Pretty much everything they write about America portrays our country in a seriously negative light – EVERYTHING.
One need not ask where RT is getting its orders from.  Whereas RIA Novosti’s orders seem to come from the truth, and actual journalism.
ria-novosti-caveat russia gay stoli
One final observation that’s particularly disturbing.  As a result of the new anti-gay law, RIA Novosti has been forced to issue a caveat before all of its new stories about “gays.”  It amounts to a journalistic child-safety warning, and smacks of the official censorship of the Soviet era (Russian President Putin, by the way, is former KGB).
One more reason why anyone concerned about human rights should be supporting the international boycott of Russia. #dumpstoli

Rush Limbaugh: Detroit Went Bankrupt Because Blacks Drove Out Whites

Rush Limbaugh: Detroit Went Bankrupt Because Blacks Drove Out Whites

By Igor Volsky and Alan Pyke on July 31, 2013 at 1:12 PM
greta_rush_073013
Economists are attributing Detroit’s recent bankruptcy filing to problems facing the entire Rust Belt region: a shrinking tax base, high health and pension costs, sprawl, and general dysfunction. But on Tuesday, Rush Limbaugh added another cause to the long list of factors that have contributed to the city’s downfall: black people.
During an appearance on Fox News’ On The Record with Greta Van Susteren on Tuesday, Limbaugh claimed that “unchecked” Democratic rule “since the last Republican mayor [in] 1957″ created a lazy and bloated culture of out-of-control spending and corruption.
“You’ve had that — that town has been a petri dish of everything the Democrat Party stands for, everything the Democrat Party loves — massive unions, massive pensions, pay people pensions and health care long after they’ve stopped working,” he said, before arguing that the city’s first black mayor exacerbated the city’s spending and sparked racial riots that chased white people into the suburbs:
LIMBAUGH: You have massive welfare states where citizens are given things left and right in order to buy their votes. You have no opposition whatsoever.
And in the case of the — you throw race into the mix and you bring on Mayor Coleman Young who causes riots in 1967 in Detroit and Mayor Young caused a white flight to suburbia, and Detroit is left with nothing but liberal Democrats running it. It is what it is. And you — any place in this country that has similar circumstances, the same fate is going to happen to them.
First, Coleman Young, who Limbaugh claims caused the riots, wasn’t elected to the mayor’s office until six years after violence broke out, in 1973. The New York Times noted in his obituary that by that point, “Detroit had already been reeling from high unemployment in the automobile industry, a high crime rate and deteriorating housing.” Young also wasn’t a proponent of the kind of welfare policies and “massive pensions,” that Limbaugh attributes to Democrats. In the 1970s and early 1980s, he was actually credited with keeping Detroit financially afloat “by persuading city workers to accept cuts in salaries and fringe benefits and voters to approve a $96 million increase in income taxes.” In the late 1990s, the city, still under Democratic rule, even experienced a small revitalization. Household incomes rose, child poverty dropped “by a stunning 13 percentage points,” and homeownership grew.
As for the 1967 riots, they occurred in the aftermath of the Civil Rights movement, when African Americans across the country were, as a study commissioned by President Lyndon Johnson put it, systematically excluded from the benefits of economic progress and faced “Pervasive discrimination and segregation in employment, education and housing.” The report, which focused on the causes of the violence, found that “white racism,” not Coleman Young, “is essentially responsible for the explosive mixture which has been accumulating in our cities since the end of World War II.”
The riots of the late 1960s set off “a chain reaction in neighboring communities.” The violence first started in Newark, New Jersey in July of 1967 and later spread to Detroit. “What the rioters appeared to be seeking was fuller participation in the social order and the material benefits enjoyed by the majority of American citizens,” the 1967 National Advisory Committee on Civil Disorders concluded. “Rather than rejecting the American system, they were anxious to obtain a place for themselves in it.”
Limbaugh is right that white people did leave Detroit in large numbers in the aftermath of the 1967 violence, but that exodus followed a trend of whites abandoning cities as black people moved in and a slowdown in the auto industry. Before the riots, the vast majority of white population growth was already occurring “in suburban portions of metropolitan areas” and white population within the city of Detroit had declined by 1.3 million between 1960 and 1967.

US Detains Undocumented Aliens in Solitary Confinement

US Detains Undocumented Aliens in Solitary Confinement

By William Boardman, Reader Supported News
31 July 13

olitary Confinement Is A Form Of Torture, All Torturers Agree
The United States officially opposes the humanitarian parole of nine young people who grew up in this country, but came here as children without proper documentation, only to mature and commit civil disobedience against the laws that stigmatize them as un-people.
For these Americans-in-all-but-papers-please, the U.S. government Dept. of Homeland Security has decided, without due process apparently, that the Constitution's 8th amendment prohibition against excessive bail or cruel and unusual punishments may be disregarded with impunity.
While this is just another routine constitutional crisis obscured from most Americans, it's a vivid illustration of the moral brutality with which the American government acts almost reflexively in response to immigration issues - issues the government has made little effort to fix for fear of depriving politically generous agribusiness and others of cheap, semi-slave labor.
As of July 29, the Dream 9 had been jailed for a week, with six of them in solitary confinement as punishment for the hunger strike they undertook in protest against Corrections Corporation of America's denial of telephone access to their lawyers and family. The Corrections Corp. is a publicly traded, for-profit company contracted by the U.S. government, which apparently sanctions torture by this contractor. Solitary confinement is internationally recognized as an element of torture.
Government Decides How to Enforce the Law, Doesn't Explain
Homeland Security, Immigration, and other officials refuse to discuss these cases. Eloy prison officials did not respond to a request for information. Reportedly officials will meet with detainess early in the week.
The Homeland Security website as of July 29 offered a policy statement that says, in part, with regard to Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA):
"As the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) continues to focus its enforcement resources on the removal of individuals who pose a danger to national security or a risk to public safety, including individuals convicted of crimes with particular emphasis on violent criminals, felons, and repeat offenders, DHS will exercise prosecutorial discretion as appropriate to ensure that enforcement resources are not expended on low priority cases, such as individuals who came to the United States as children…. " [emphasis added]
All nine members of the Dream 9 being held in Eloy prison first came to the United States as children under 16, one as young as four months old.
The Dream 9 Protest Started With The Dreamers in Graduation Garb
A week earlier, on July 22, they were all wearing graduation caps and gowns, signifying their high school and college diplomas and degrees, as they walked from the Mexican side of the border in Nogales to the U.S. immigration offices, where they sought to re-enter the U.S. legally.
Six of them had come to this country as children and lived most of their lives here, becoming American is almost every way but legally, eventually getting caught up in the byzantine application of immigration law enforcement that effectively exiled them from their own country. The other three members of the Dream 9 voluntarily left the U.S. in order to take part in this action, to highlight the injustice of U.S. immigration law and to test the government's ability to exercise prosecutorial discretion and to act justly.
At the U.S. immigration office in Nogales, the Americans promptly took the Dream 9 into custody, even though each of them presented officials with documents that supported their individual stories, along with formal requests for admission to the U.S.
Tucson attorney Margo Cowan represented the Dream 9 and formally asked the federal officials to grant each of the nine a humanitarian parole, which would allow them to return home in the U.S. to await formal proceedings. She argued that her clients were not a flight risk and wanted only to go home and continue their lives. Each of the Dream 9 also requested asylum in the U.S., a request the U.S. has ignored.
The Private Prison Contractor Has An Ugly Public Reputation
The government promptly and arbitrarily denied every request, without holding any hearing. The government sent the nine to prison, first in Florence, and then to the private prison run by the for-profit Corrections Corp. in Eloy. The nine remained there as of July 29, six of them in solitary confinement, with no action scheduled on their cases.
The Eloy prison has a horrific reputation as a savage place going back at least as far as 2007, when detainee deaths in Homeland Security custody drew attention even from the New York Times. Already this year there have been two more detainee deaths, apparent hanging suicides two men aged 24 and 40. At least one other prisoner, a U.S. military veteran, is currently being force-fed because he was on a hunger strike.
The website DREAM ACTIVIST, the "Undocumented Students Action & Resource Network offers brief biographies of some ht the Dream 9, whom some now consider prisoners of conscience or political prisoners:
  • Claudia Amaro, 37, from Monterrey, Mexico moved to Colorado when she was thirteen years old. Her mother fled Mexico after her father was murdered and the family was threatened. In 2006, while living in Wichita, Kansas, Claudia's husband was detained while driving to work. ICE detained Claudia while interpreting for her husband.
Living in Mexico has been hard for Claudia and her thirteen-year-old US citizen son. Finally, her mother gained legal status last year and was able to visit her grandson for the first time in seven years. Claudia is coming home to put the family back together that deportation tore apart.
Adriana Diaz, 22, from Mexico City, first came to Phoenix, Arizona when she was just four months old. Adriana graduated from Crestview Preparatory high school in 2010 with many accolades, including the Citizenship Award. To this day, two of her murals decorate its walls. Adriana left Phoenix three months before DACA was announced. She left because she was tired of living in fear under [County Sheriff] Arpaio, not knowing each night if her mom was going to come home.
Once in Nogales, Adriana tried to go to school. Because she lived so long in the US, Mexico recognized her as a foreign student and would not accept her US degree. Instead of going to school, Adriana has been working with migrants at the Juan Bosco shelter in Sonora. Adriana is coming home because she has no memories in Mexico. Her entire life was in Phoenix—she has memories of school, birthdays, going to prom—even her partner of four years lives in Phoenix. Everyone deserves to come home.
  • Luis Gustavo, 20, from Michoacán, Mexico has lived in North Carolina since he was five years old. He graduated from McDowell High School. Luis left Marion, NC, in August 2011 with the hopes of being able to finally go to school in Mexico. Luis, not being able to stand being away from his family, tried to come home in June 2012 when the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program was announced.
Luis never made it; he was caught by border patrol. The responding agent sympathized with him, and filed for DACA on his behalf, but saw it rejected. Luis was subsequently deported. Desperate to come home, Luis attempted to re-enter three more times, and failed on each attempt. Luis is coming home to be with his mother, sister, and four brothers.
Maria Peniche, 22, from Mexico City first came to Boston when she was just ten years old. She graduated from Revere high school in 2010 and went on to attend Pine Manor College. By 2012, paying the high price of tuition became too difficult, and she dropped out. Three days before DACA was announced, Maria left for Mexico to continue her schooling. "Here in Mexico you can only do one thing, either work or go to school," she said. Maria has had to put off her studies and work in order to provide for her family. Maria is coming home to provide for herself and her family, and pursue her education.
  • Ceferino Santiago, 21, came to Lexington, Kentucky, at the age of thirteen in order to be with his older brother, Pedro. Ceferino is a permanent part of the Lexington community; he helped paint a mural at one of the local middle schools. During high-school, Ceferino ran for the school cross country team and was honored as one of the program's top student-athletes in 2010. After graduating from high school, Ceferino was forced to return to Oaxaca, Mexico because of an ear infection which required surgery that cost $21,000. Ceferino is coming home so he can be with his brother, his community, and to continue with his studies.
A sixth member is Mario Felix, who joined this action at the last minute. He is currently being held in solitary confinement, along with Claudia Amaro and Ceferino Santiago. All three are currently in solitary confinement.
The other three members of the Dream 9 all voluntarily left the U.S. in order to take part in this demonstration of immigration injustice.
  • Lizbeth Mateo came to the U.S. before she was 16 and grew up in Los Angeles. Before returning for the Dream 9 action, she had not seen her family in 15 years.

  • Lulu Martinez, who came to the U.S. at the age of three, has spent years as an activist for justice in immigration rights and LGBT rights.
    Marco Saavedra is a poet and painter who graduated from Kenyon College in Ohio. Before joining the Dream 9, he worked at his family's restaurant in New York City. He came to the U.S. before he was 16.
Dream 9 Attorney Says Government Policy Amounts To "A War on The Poor"
The attorney representing the Dream 9 is a longtime activist for immigrants' rights and is a staff attorney at the Pima County Public Defender's office, where her biography is posted:
  • Margo Cowan - Graduate of the Antioch School of Law, Washington, D.C., 1985; admitted to the State Bar of Pennsylvania in 1986; admitted to the State Bar of Arizona in 1995; substantial experience as an attorney in general immigration practice since 1986; General Counsel, Tohono O'Odham Nation 1993-2003; Of Counsel, Congressman Raul Grijalva, 2004; extensive pro bono work, mainly in the areas of border/immigration policy development and representation of undocumented persons and refugees; Defense Attorney in the Law Offices of the Pima County Public Defender since 2004.
In March 2007, the National Association for Social Workers- AZ Branch II awarded Margo with the Cesar Chavez Humanitarian Award for her dedication in advancing human rights for over thirty-five years. An example of this dedication is her co-founding of the group No More Deaths. This group provides assistance to migrants returning from the U.S. to the border towns of Mexico, and their sole purpose is to reduce the amount of deaths in the Arizona Desert. In a book published in 2010 by Beacon Press, "The Death of Josseline: Immigration Stories from the Arizona Borderlands," author Margaret Regan refers to Cowan as "the indefatigable pro bono attorney for No More Deaths." Regan quotes Cowan as describing U.S. immigration policy as "a war on the poor." About her own work, Cowan said: "Everything we do is transparent. We're just a group of people who think migrants shouldn't die in the desert on their way to clean toilets."

Gay rights across the globe: the best and worst countries for equality

Gay rights across the globe: the best and worst countries for equality

Emine Saner – The Guardian
July 31st, 2013
  • Gay rights across the globe: the best and worst countries for equality
We have a US president who supports gay marriage, and now a pope who, if not exactly signing up to equality for all, is at least starting to talk in language less inflammatory than his predecessor. "If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has goodwill, who am I to judge?" he told an assembled group of journalists on the papal plane back from his tour of Brazil. Then he went on to criticize the gay "lobby" and said he wasn't going to break with the catechism that said "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered". Still, for a brief moment it looked like a minor breakthrough.
Then you weigh it against a raft of anti-homosexuality legislation that is coming into force in countries across the world. In Russia, gay teenagers are being tortured and forcibly outed on the Internet against a backdrop of laws that look completely out of step with the rest of Europe. In what is being described as rolling the "status of LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] people back to the Stalin era", President Putin has passed a number of anti-gay laws, including legislation that punishes people and groups that distribute information considered "propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations". The country also now has powers to arrest and detain foreign citizens believe to be gay, or "pro-gay". It has led to the boycott of Russian vodka brands by gay bars and clubs in solidarity, started by writer and activist Dan Savage and taken up by bars in London.
In many African countries where homosexuality is already illegal, more Draconian anti-gay laws are being passed and violence against LGBT people is increasing.
Is there a link between growing rights in some countries and worsening or removal of rights in others? "There are really complicated links between the two. If you look at the history of the advancement of LGBT rights in the UK, every advance is accompanied by a backlash," says Alistair Stewart, assistant director of the Kaleidoscope Trust, a UK-based organization that supports international LGBT rights. "To a certain extent that's happening on a global scale now – the advances that are being made in some parts of the world encourage a backlash in other parts of the world. The struggle for even basic human rights for LGBT people – freedom of association, freedom from violence – becomes harder to achieve when the opponents can point to something like gay marriage, which isn't even on the books for most of the countries we're talking about and make the argument that 'if we give these people even the most basic of human rights, next they'll be asking to get married in our churches'." Jonathan Cooper, chief executive of the Human Dignity Trust, is less sure they are related: "The further persecution is already happening."

Gay rights around the world: the best and worst countries for equality

Equal marriage laws are being passed in several countries, but in Russia, life grows harsher each month for LGBT people. Which places are best and worst for gay rights?

Two women kiss in front of people taking part in a demonstration against gay marriage
An act of defiance in front of a demonstration against gay marriage in Marseille, France, in 2012. Photograph: Gerard Julien/AFP/Getty Images
We have a US president who supports gay marriage, and now a pope who, if not exactly signing up to equality for all, is at least starting to talk in language less inflammatory than his predecessor. "If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has goodwill, who am I to judge?" he told an assembled group of journalists on the papal plane back from his tour of Brazil. Then he went on to criticise the gay "lobby" and said he wasn't going to break with the catechism that said "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered". Still, for a brief moment it looked like a minor breakthrough.
Then you weigh it against a raft of anti-homosexuality legislation that is coming into force in countries across the world. In Russia, gay teenagers are being tortured and forcibly outed on the Internet against a backdrop of laws that look completely out of step with the rest of Europe. In what is being described as rolling the "status of LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] people back to the Stalin era", President Putin has passed a number of anti-gay laws, including legislation that punishes people and groups that distribute information considered "propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations". The country also now has powers to arrest and detain foreign citizens believe to be gay, or "pro-gay". It has led to the boycott of Russian vodka brands by gay bars and clubs in solidarity, started by writer and activist Dan Savage and taken up by bars in London.
In many African countries where homosexuality is already illegal, more Draconian anti-gay laws are being passed and violence against LGBT people is increasing.
Is there a link between growing rights in some countries and worsening or removal of rights in others? "There are really complicated links between the two. If you look at the history of the advancement of LGBT rights in the UK, every advance is accompanied by a backlash," says Alistair Stewart, assistant director of the Kaleidoscope Trust, a UK-based organisation that supports international LGBT rights. "To a certain extent that's happening on a global scale now – the advances that are being made in some parts of the world encourage a backlash in other parts of the world. The struggle for even basic human rights for LGBT people – freedom of association, freedom from violence – becomes harder to achieve when the opponents can point to something like gay marriage, which isn't even on the books for most of the countries we're talking about and make the argument that 'if we give these people even the most basic of human rights, next they'll be asking to get married in our churches'." Jonathan Cooper, chief executive of the Human Dignity Trust, is less sure they are related: "The further persecution is already happening."
The Human Dignity Trust challenges laws to end the persecution of LGBT people around the world. "Most countries sign up to international human rights treaties. If you take Belize as an example, it has ratified all the key UN human rights treaties and in their constitution they have a right to a private life, to equality, to dignity. And so basically to criminalise homosexuality is a violation. To bring a legal challenge against that takes a very brave individual." It has been supporting Caleb Orozco, the gay rights campaigner who launched a legal challenge to overturn Belize's criminalisation laws. "We're still waiting for the judgment. They said it would be out by the end of July but obviously it's not coming now."
Orozco's case has prompted a backlash in Belize against him, and Unibam (the United Belize Advocacy Movement). A report last week from the Southern Poverty Law Center, the US civil rights organisation, highlighted the influence US hardline religious groups had in Belize and other countries. "Many of these American religious-right groups know they have lost the battle against LGBT rights in the US, and they're now aiding and abetting anti-LGBT forces in countries where anti-gay violence is prevalent," said Heidi Beirich, author of the report. "These groups are pouring fuel on an exceedingly volatile fire."
It's the classic missionary model, says Stewart, "where money and resources and organisation are set up in the countries that they are targeting". It's also worth remembering which country is responsible for the legacy of persecution faced by millions of LGBT people today. There are more than 75 countries where homosexuality is still criminalised: "Forty-two of them are former British colonies so we can see where the legacy comes from," says Cooper. To see which countries are getting worse in terms of gay rights makes grim reading, but Stewart is cheered by the support he sees. "One of the reassuring things that has come out of the response to the Russian laws in particular is there is a growing international apprehension. One of the last great undone pieces of the civil rights movement is to address the rights of LGBT people, and there does seem to be a growing international support for change."

Where are LGBT rights improving?

Parts of Latin America remain the standard for equality for LGBT rights. Argentina's Gender Identity Law 2012 allowed the change of gender on birth certificates for transgender people. It also legalised same-sex marriage in 2010, giving same-sex couples the same rights as opposite-sex couples, including the right to adopt children. Uruguay and Mexico City also allow equal marriage and adoption, and last week Colombia recognised its first legal same-sex civil union (not "marriage").
In Asia, LGBT groups are making progess, if slowly. Last year, Vietnam saw its first gay pride rally and this year's event will launch a campaign for equality in employment. On Tuesday, it was reported that the country's ministry of justice has backed plans to legalise gay marriage, after the ministry of health came out for marriage equality in April.
In Singapore the Pink Dot pride rally attracted 21,000 people at the end of June – its biggest number since it started four years ago. "It's a strong signal that Singapore is not as conservative as some think," Paerin Choa, a rally spokesman, told Reuters. Just hours before attending the rally, Vincent Wijeysingha became Singapore's first openly gay politician when he officially came out. The country bans gay sex, though this is rarely enforced, but in April a gay couple, Gary Lim and Kenneth Chee, attempted to get the law removed. Their case was dismissed, but they are appealing with the help of Lord Goldsmith, the former attorney general.
The Human Dignity Trust filed a suit at the European court of human rights against Turkish-occupied northern Cyprus, the only place in Europe where homosexuality is still illegal, and looks likely to win.
In a letter sent to the Kaleidoscope Trust, the prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago expressed her wish to repeal the laws that ban homosexuality. The prime minister of Jamaica, Portia Simpson Miller, has voiced similar wishes. In June, Javed Jaghai was the lastest activist to launch legal proceedings to challenge the anti-sodomy laws (however, violence against gay people is increasing, and 17-year-old Dwayne Jones was stabbed to death last week at a party according to local media reports).
In Malawi, the president Joyce Banda announced in 2012 that laws criminalising homosexuality would be repealed – she has since distanced herself from that, although there has been a moratorium and there have been no prosecutions. "So it's not just the global north where things are moving forward. In some parts of the world where you'd least expect them, things are getting better," says Stewart.
The number of countries legalising same-sex marriage continues to grow, with Denmark, Brazil, France and New Zealand just some that joined more progressive countries that had legalised it earlier. Last month in the US, where Barack Obama publicly supports equal marriage and it is legal in several states, the supreme court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (which prevented the federal government from recognising marriages between gay couples) as unconstitutional. And of course England and Wales now has the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013.

Where are LGBT rights worsening?

In Iran, a place where homosexuality is punishable by death and you thought LGBT rights couldn't really get worse, this year the country's official who works on human rights described homosexuality as "an illness that should be cured". Of course, gay rights are no better in many other Middle Eastern countries. The ILGA (International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association) provides a comprehensive look at state-sponsored homophobia in a 2013 report.
Gay-rights activist Yury Gavrikov is detained by Russian riot police Gay-rights activist Yury Gavrikov is detained by riot police at a rally in Moscow in May. Photograph: Kirill Kudryavtsev/AFP/Getty Images Two weeks ago, Eric Ohena Lembembe, was found at home in YaoundĂ©, the capital of Cameroon. He had been tortured – his neck and feet broken, his body burned with an iron – and murdered. As the executive director of Camfaids, Lembembe was one of Cameroon's most prominent and outspoken LGBT rights activists and openly gay – an astonishing act of bravery in a country where homosexuality is punishable with prison and violence against LGBT people is common and almost never investigated. Amnesty International's 2013 report on global human rights stated even people who supported LGBT rights were being harrassed, particularly equality lawyers Alice Nkom and Michel Togue who had both received calls and text messages threatening to kill them and their children if they did not stop defending gay people who had been arrested. In June this year, Togue's office was broken into and files and computers stolen. In March 2012, a workshop held to educate young people about LGBT issues was shut down.
Last week, two men were given prison sentences under the country's anti-gay laws; in 2011, another man, Jean-Claude Roger Mbédé, was sentenced to three years in prison for sending a text message to another man. Men who are perceived to be gay are arrested, somtimes only on the basis of someone's suspicions, and some are forced to undergo rectal examinations and tortured into confessing. "They have such an active prosecution system," says Cooper. "Although prosecutions do occur in other jurisdictions, you don't have that kind of active prosecution policy that you have in Cameroon."
After the death of Lembembe, gay-rights groups said they couldn't continue their work unless they are given protection by international donors who fund the fight against HIV/Aids. "We have all decided to stop our work in the field because our security is at risk," said Yves Yomb, executive director of Alternatives-Cameroun. "We have no protection from the police and we feel that our lives are at risk."
Sharing a border with Cameroon, Nigeria's anti-gay laws are becoming ever more draconian. It recently passed a bill outlawing same-sex marriage, punishable with a 14-year prison term. "Nobody in the country is seriously asking for gay marriage," says Stewart from the Kaleidoscope Trust. "There is no reason to legislate against it, when homosexual sex is already illegal. It also has more concerning provisions that ban the formation of groups that support LGBT rights and a series of provisions that if you know a homosexual but don't turn them in, you are aiding and abetting. That isn't on the statute books yet but it seems likely that it will pass in some form."
Politicians in Uganda are attempting to pass a similar bill, at one point seeking to punish homosexual relationships with the death penalty; people found guilty of being gay will now face life imprisonment, and anybody – parents, teachers, doctors – who suspects someone in their care is gay will be punished if they do not report them.
Last week, President Mugabe told a rally of Zanu PF supporters that Zimbabwe would never accept homosexuality, and that gay people were "worse than pigs, goats and birds". There are 38 African countries where homosexuality is illegal.
In Russia, gay rights are moving further away from other European countries. In an extreme version of Britain's section 28, a new law will punish anybody disseminating "propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations among minors expressed in distribution of information … aimed at the formation … of … misperceptions of the social equivalence of traditional and non-traditional sexual relations". It has also failed to comply with the 2010 judgment at the European court of human rights that requires it to allow gay pride events. Violence against LGBT people is rising. In May, there was a brutal murder of a man who had revealed to "friends" he was gay. Official numbers of homophobic attacks are low, but LGBT activists say this is because attacks are not often reported, and when they are police rarely label them as such, but one poll last year of nearly 900 people by the Russian LGBT Network found more than 15% had experienced physical violence between November 2011 and August 2012.
Last week, the Pink News reported neo-Nazi groups in Russia has been luring gay teenagers to meetings, where they are forced to come out in videos that are then posted on social media sites. It reported that one victim, 19-year-old Alex Bulygin, killed himself after his sexuality was revealed.
Russia's renewed attacks on homosexuality may be spreading beyond its borders – there are moves in Ukraine to adopt its own ban on "gay propaganda" and in May the parliament dropped a bill that would have outlawed discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation after a protest by anti-gay activists.

When History Repeats...

SundayJuly 282013
 
When History Repeats...
 
 

There once was a country that was due to host  the next  Winter Olympic Games.  This nation had worked very hard  to secure the games.    This  nation's leader saw it a  matter of both national and personal pride.  His nation  was emerging from  period of  economic  and political upheaval  stemming from  the collapse of it's former imperial system and the resulting loss in prestige.
 
Less than a year  out  from those upcoming games this nation passed a host of new laws which specifically targeted  one minority group, painting a picture of this group as a threat to children the nation and society at large.  

The new laws  stated:
 
Marriages for members of this minority were forbidden. 
Sexual relations for members of this minority group were either restricted or forbidden. 
Members of this minority group could be fired from jobs for no reason other than for who they were. 
Members of this minority group were officially branded a security risk to the state. 

As a result of these new laws being passedgroups of young thugs were reportedly emboldened into seeking out members of this minority group and harassing, beating and in some cases torturing and even killing them.
 

The response from the International Olympic Committee (IOC) at the time ..... Silence.   Not one word of protest was heard and a year later in 1936, just a few months after the passage of 1935 Nuremberg Laws, targeting Germany's Jewish population, the Winter Olympics were held in Garmisch-Partenkirchen Germany under the watchful gaze of Germany's aggressive charismatic leaderAdolf Hitler.
 
Funny how history often repeats itself ... Fast forward 78 years to 2013. We are less than a year out from the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia. An Olympic Games viewed by many as Russia's re-emergence on to the world cultural stage since the collapse of the Soviet Unionand clearly a point of personal pride for Russia's "macho-man" PresidentVladimir Putin.
 
With only months go to before the opening ceremony of these games Russia has seen fit to pass new laws which .....

specifically targets one minority group for discrimination and even criminal prosecution for no reason other than for who they are.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(From the Guardian.)
 
Russia's parliament has unanimously passed a federal law banning gay "propaganda" amid a Kremlin push to enshrine deeply conservative values that critics say has already led to a sharp increase in anti-gay violence.
 
The law passed 436-0 on Tuesdaywith just one deputy abstaining from voting on the bill which bans the spreading of "propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations" among minors. The law in effect makes it illegal to equate straight and gay relationships as well as the distribution of material on gay rights. It introduces fines for individuals and media groups found guilty of breaking the lawas well as special fines for foreigners.
 
Minutes after passing the anti-gay legislation the Duma also approved a new law allowing jail sentences of up to three years for "offending religious feelings", an initiative launched in the wake of the trial against the anti-Kremlin punk band Pussy Riot. The two laws were widely criticised by Russia's marginalised liberal and human rights communities and come amid a wider crackdown against independent civil activity in the country.
 
------------------------------------------------------------
Right on cue we get this report   from  Eastern European Human Rights watch dog group  Spectrum Human Rights Alliance.:
President Putin's crusade against LGBT community in Russia took a new turn.
Infamous Russian ultra nationalist and former skin head Maxim Martsinkevich, known under the nickname "Cleaver" (or "Tesak" in Russian) spearheaded a country wide campaign against LGBT teens using a popular social network VK.com to lure unsuspected victims through personal ads.
Oddly enough their idea of fighting pedophiles targets exclusively male teenagers who respond to the same-sex personal ads and show up for a date. Captured victims are bullied and often tortured while being recorded on video.  These self-proclaimed "crime fighters" perform their actions under the broad day light often outside and clearly visible to general public that indifferently passes by or even commend them.


Video recordings of bullying and tortures are freely distributed on the Internet in order to out LGBT teens to their respective schoolsparents and friends. Many victims were driven to suicidesthe rest are deeply traumatized.    So far Russian police took no action against these "movements" even though Russian criminal code was clearly violated and despite numerous complaints from parentsvictims and LGBT activists. 
-----------------------------------------------------------
Imagine for one moment if Russia's new laws were targeting Blacksor Asiansor Womenor even Christians. Imagine groups of thugs using social media to lure any of those aforementioned groups into traps where they were beaten and tortured The global outcry would be deafening.

The list of nations  boycotting the games in Sochiwould be so long that the IOC would have moved so fast to pull the games out of Russiaas to make President Putin's head spin.  Yet just like with the Jews in 1935to target Gays and Lesbians in 2013 garners barely a shrug from the International Olympic " family". Instead we get this:
 
 
 
The International Olympic Committee said Friday that athletes and visitors attending the 2014 Sochi Games in Russia will not be affected by anti-gay legislation passed last month.
"The IOC has received assurances from the highest level of government in Russia that the legislation will not affect those attending or taking part in the Games" according to the statement emailed to USA TODAY Sports.
The IOC also said: "The International Olympic Committee is clear that sport is a human right and should be available to all regardless of racesex or sexual orientation. The Games themselves should be open to allfree of discriminationand that applies to spectatorsofficialsmedia and of course athletes. We would oppose in the strongest terms any move that would jeopardise this principle."
Did you catch that? The response from the IOC is not that the laws in question are horrific
and wrongbut rather"Oh don't worry... Putin has promised that he probably won't enforce these laws against people coming to Russia for the Olympics." Not that the brutal targeting and torture of LGBT youth in Russia must stopbut rather all those Gay Olympians and fans from outside Russia needn't worry about their own safety.
 
Now I hear many of you saying"C'mon Dave! You are not really equating Russia in 2013 to Nazi Germany in 1935 are you ?"  Yes I am.   Am I equating Vladimir Putin with Adolf Hitler? Yes I am.   Am I saying the skinhead thugs who are attacking LGBT teens in Russia are the same as the Nazi supporters in the 1930's who attacked Jewish homesshops and synagogues? Yes I am.
 
When you use the power of the state to scapegoat one minority for no other reasons than bigotryand political expedienceWhen you allow a minority group to be terrorizedbrutalized and marginalized for no other reason than they cant fight backWhen you brand a minority group as less than humanand therefore deserving of inhuman treatmentWhen you do these thingsyou are no different than the Nazi Brownshirts of Krystalnacht and the regime of Adolf Hitler that urged them on.
 
The IOC owes it to historyit owes it to the memory of those who could have possibly been helpedin 1935 when the Olympic Family was in a position to say this is wrong. The IOC owes it the LGBT citizens of not only Russiabut everywhereto this timedo what is rightto live up to the words of the Olympic motto and take a stand for human rights.
 
The 2014 Winter Olympic Games must be moved out of Russiaand these modern day Anti Gay "Nuremberg Laws"must be loudly and unequivocally condemned.
 
Anything lessis just history repeating.

Snowden deals blow to ‘global electronic prison camp’ – Russian Orthodox Church

Snowden deals blow to ‘global electronic prison camp’ – Russian Orthodox Church

by aletho
RT | July 30, 2013
Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin has praised Russian authorities for not caving in to pressure from abroad, saying granting asylum to US whistleblower Edward Snowden would help prevent the establishment of a ‘global electronic prison camp’.
“It is encouraging news that Russia is demonstrating its independence in this case as it has in many others, despite the pressure” said the head of the Holy Synod’s Department for Relations between the Church and Society.
Vsevolod Chaplin added that the Snowden saga has been broadly discussed both on the domestic and international level, with Russia’s position potentially bolstering its image as a country upholding “the true freedom of ideals.”
The Russian cleric further argued that Snowden’s revelations confirmed the existence of a pernicious problem discussed by Orthodox Christians for many years – “the prospective of a global electronic-totalitarian prison camp”.
“First they get people addicted to convenient means of communication with the authorities, businesses and among each other. In a while people become rigidly connected to these services and as a result the economic and political owners of these services get tremendous and terrifying power. They cannot help feeling the temptation to use this power to control the personality and such control might eventually be much stricter that all known totalitarian systems of the twentieth century,” Interfax news agency quoted Chaplin as saying.
The church official added that in his view true democracy remained an unreachable ideal.
“Any political system fixes the domination of a few over many. In the twentieth century the harshest forms of such political power used brute force, but now they are using soft power, through total data collecting and through soft persuasion of people, first through slogans but then through legal acts,” Chaplin explained. He noted that currently the soft power system was promoting such topics as declaring the western political system as the only viable option, making religion a marginal trend, and sidelining both criticism of market fundamentalism and leftist political platforms.
Chaplin urged Russian authorities to defend “real freedom, the freedom from the global ideological dictate and from the electronic prison camp.”
The cleric also offered a possible solution – the development of its own electronic communications system that would be independent from foreign-based mediums. “The nation has the brains for this and I hope we will also have a will,” Chaplin declared.
Russia is currently considering Edward Snowden’s request for temporary asylum and the former NSA contractor still remains in the transit zone of the Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport.
The Russian Justice Ministry on Tuesday sent a formal response to a letter from US Attorney General, who assured Moscow that Snowden would not face the prospect of death or torture if handed over to the United States.
The Russian ministry did not provide the details of its reply to the press.
aletho

Bathers 'Desecrate' IDF War Memorial

Bathers 'Desecrate' IDF War Memorial

Local residents shocked and offended by incident in which families went swimming in a memorial to victims of helicopter tragedy.

By Chana Ya'ar
First Publish: 7/31/2013, 1:22 PM

'Water does not raise the soul"
'Water does not raise the soul"
Arutz Sheva / Israel news photo
Residents of Sha'ar Yashuv, in northern Israel, expressed their shock at a recent incident, reported by Arutz Sheva, in which a memorial to fallen IDF soldiers was brazenly used as a swimming pool by two unrepentant families, in broad daylight.
The two Hareidi-religious families allowed their children to play in the waters at a monument to the victims of a tragic helicopter crash 16 years ago. Both parents and children were seen bathing in the monument, a pool of water whose mosaic floor is covered with the names of the fallen IDF soldiers who perished in the crash at Sha'ar Yashuv.
In 1997, two IAF Yasur helicopters collided as they were leading fighters to the Lebanese security zone. Seventy-three soldiers were killed in the disaster, including eight Israeli Air Force personnel.
Passing residents who saw the families cooling off in the monument called out to the tourists, asking them to stop playing in the water.
“Please get out and stop splashing around with your children,” one person said. “You don’t have to respect [the soldiers] but please do not hurt the feelings of their bereaved loved ones. It’s fortunate no family members were nearby.”
One of the bathers, a hareidi-religious man, acknowledged that he knew where he was, and that he recognized the names at the bottom of the pool as those of the helicopter victims.  But that did not stop the children from wearing bathing suits, playing around and splashing water.
“By us, we light yarzheit candles for the soul and recite Tehillim (psalms),” he shouted, arguing with a resident of the area. “Water does not raise a person’s soul, and there’s nothing sacred about it. I prefer to talk to G-d.”
He called on his children to continue playing in the monument pool, adding, “I pay taxes just like you, and I will do here as I please.”
The incident has caused a public outcry in a country where many families have suffered the loss of family members during the numerous wars waged by Arab states and terrorist groups.

Ex-pupils allege they were raped and abused by monks at schools in Scotland

- Benedictine order plans inquiry into Scotland schools child abuse scandal
- Ex-pupils allege they were raped and abused by monks at schools in Scotland
- Head of Benedictines apologises over abuse
- Police investigate Australian priest over Scottish abuse allegations

Benedictine order plans inquiry into Scotland schools child abuse scandal

Senior figures plan own investigation into allegations that monks abused boys at Fort Augustus and Carlekemp Priory schools

    Severin Carrell, Scotland correspondent
    theguardian.com, Tuesday 30 July 2013

Senior figures in the Benedictine religious order are planning their own inquiry into harrowing allegations that monks sexually and physically abused dozens of boys at two schools in Scotland.

Police in Scotland have launched an investigation into disclosures by former pupils at Fort Augustus in the Highlands and Carlekemp Priory school near Edinburgh that monks subjected them to systematic violence and sexual assaults, including claims that one now deceased monk raped five boys.

Dom Richard Yeo, the head of the UK's largest Benedictine group of congregations, said he had already been contacted by detectives from Police Scotland over the allegations, detailed in a BBC Scotland documentary on Monday.

In May the Observer revealed that a police investigation had begun into Fort Augustus after one pupil, Andrew Lavery, accused monks there of "systematic, brutal, awful torture", which included being locked alone for days at a time in a room.

That included sexual assaults by monks, while other ex-pupils spoke of repeated bullying and sexually predatory behaviour....

The BBC programme, Sins of the Fathers, alleged that nine monks at the schools repeatedly beat, sexually assaulted and, in one case, raped boys in their care over several decades. Victims of the abuse complained but their testimony was ignored. One priest allegedly involved, now living in Sydney, Australia, has been suspended by the Australian church after the BBC tracked him down....
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/30/benedictine-monks-inquiry-scotland-child-abuse http://goo.gl/WYTQXe  

Ex-pupils allege they were raped and abused by monks at schools in Scotland

Men tell BBC documentary they suffered sexual and physical assaults while at two exclusive schools which have since closed

    Severin Carrell, Scotland correspondent
    The Guardian, Monday 29 July 2013

Dozens of pupils at exclusive Roman Catholic boarding schools in Scotland have alleged they were sexually and physically abused by monks, one of whom allegedly raped at least five boys.

Nine Benedictine monks who taught at the Fort Augustus Abbey school in the Highlands and its preparatory school in East Lothian have been accused of repeatedly beating, sexually assaulting and verbally abusing boys in their care over several decades.

One monk, Father Aidan Duggan, who taught at Fort Augustus and Carlkemp prep school, which both closed in the 1990s, was accused by five ex-pupils of raping and sexually abusing them, but they claim their allegations were ignored and rejected by two headteachers, according to the BBC.

Duggan, an Australian, died in 2004 after returning to become a parish priest in Sydney.

Another priest, Father Chrysostom Alexander, now 77, is also alleged to have abused one pupil at the Fort Augustus school in the 1970s.

Alexander, also an Australian, returned to work in Sydney and has now been suspended by the Catholic church after he was challenged about the allegations by a BBC journalist. Alexander did not respond to the allegations.

The allegations, in a BBC documentary Sins of the Fathers, broadcast on BBC1 Scotland on Monday, are now being investigated by Police Scotland in the latest in a series of scandals about abuse by priests and misconduct by senior figures within the Scottish church....

One former pupil, Donald Macleod, told the documentary that Duggan had effectively groomed him before raping him when he was 14.

Macleod tried to raise the alarm but the then headteacher refused to hear about the alleged rape, warning him that lies were a mortal sin.

The BBC documentary alleges the Benedictine authorities failed to warn their Australian counterparts about the allegations against Duggan, who continued to abuse in Sydney.

The Benedictines are also accused of using Fort Augustus as a secret "dumping ground" for problem priests who were removed from their parishes after being accused of abusing children.

Their superiors are alleged to have used that transfer to cover up the abuse....
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/29/pupils-allege-rape-catholic-schools-scotland  http://goo.gl/nIF9dj 

Head of Benedictines apologises over abuse
29 July 2013

The Abbot President of the Benedictines, which ran Fort Augustus, has apologised to any victims of child abuse, after the BBC uncovered evidence of serious physical and sexual abuse at the boarding school.

Accounts of abuse at the now-closed Fort Augustus Abbey School, in the Highlands, and feeder school Carlekemp, in East Lothian, span 30 years....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-23490806  http://goo.gl/MXpbmb 
Police investigate Australian priest over Scottish abuse allegations

Tue Jul 30, 2013 AEST

A six month investigation by the BBC has found a multitude of allegations of sexual and physical abuse over 30 years at the prestigious Fort Augustus Abbey School in Scotland. Two Australian men are at the centre of the allegations, including one who's been suspended from the Catholic Church pending an investigation.
Ashley Hall

Transcript

ASHLEY HALL: Donald McLeod was 13 when he went to the Abbey in 1961.

DONALD MCLEOD: Um...

INTERVIEWER: He raped you?

DONALD MCLEOD: Yeah, I guess so. Yes.

ASHLEY HALL: The man who attacked him was an Australian, Aidan Duggan. Donald McLeod says Duggan groomed him during piano and photography lessons, and then, when he was 14, Duggan sexually assaulted him.

Donald McLeod raised the alarm, but no one believed him.

MARK DALY: The headmaster refused to believe the allegation, told the boy that he was lying and that if he continued to lie about Father Aidan, that he would go to hell. And nothing was done to Father Aidan. He was allowed to continue teaching and continue abusing.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-07-30/police-investigate-australian-priest-over-scottish/4853630?section=nsw  http://goo.gl/BBe21B 

You live where ?

Yes it's really a town........
  
 You live where 
 
                              Fucking, a little Town in Austria ...
Yes, that's the town's name, read this.
The newspaper article below is even funnier than the sign!
5773B19A50884BD793429FFE4BBE9519B6C1820C9F9041149A995BC6FBEE26A5
Are the residents called Fuckers?
And what about the Fucking neighborhood?
What are the mothers called?
What would you be learning at Fucking High School ?
Where is the Fucking Post Office?
What does the Fucking Hospital help you with?
And the Fucking drivers!
If your friend came from another town, he wouldn't be your Fucking friend.
Is fishing allowed in the Fucking Lake ?
We had a wonderful time at Fucking.
We stayed in a Fucking chalet!
Fucking needs government funding.
Does anyone care about Fucking?

91C2B02204F24F60BDF974DFA274E4C3
I didn't believe this was true.... So I did an Internet search.
It's TRUE!!! Here's more pictures and info....
C9A665E973C64D568A5DB97083F76D8A

 
Now, this one is really good! The sign says 'Bitte! Nicht so schnell',
which in English translates to, 'Please! Not so fast!'
7E03C7FB59D14F5488523248D4D24C1E
It gets even funnier! .... Pronounced 'fooking', the little hamlet of Fucking is named after the man who founded the village in the 6th century. His name? Focko.
NOW YOU CAN FORWARD THIS TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS WHO KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THIS FUCKING TOWN.

A Guide To The New Middle East Peace Talks

A Guide To The New Middle East Peace Talks

By Ben Armbruster on July 30, 2013 at 9:45 am
kerry israel palestine iftar
Israeli and Palestinian negotiators sat down together for the first time in 3 years on Monday at an Iftar dinner at the State Department in Washington, DC, marking the beginning of a months-long process aimed at achieving a final peace agreement ending the decades-old conflict between the two sides.
Secretary of State John Kerry recently announced the resumption of peace talks after months of working behind the scenes in what many analysts say is perhaps the final opportunity to achieve a two-state solution to the conflict. As the process is just getting underway, we take a look at how we got here and what to look for going forward:
  • Urgency. “I believe the window for a two-state solution is shutting,” Kerry told a House panel back in April. “I think we have some period of time a year, a year and a half, to two years or its over.” Other current and former top Israeli officials have offered similar warnings in recent weeks. Why? The rapid expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank is increasingly making the creation of a Palestinian state on that land more difficult. And as Yuval Diksin, the former head of Israel’s domestic security service, warned, the alternatives to two-states could either mean the end of Israel as a Jewish state or the end of Israel as a democratic one.
  • Kerry’s Role. Since becoming the nation’s top diplomat earlier this year, John Kerry made a resolution to the conflict a centerpiece of his tenure and worked tirelessly trying to get the Israelis and Palestinians back to the negotiating table, a process that was reportedly years in the making. According to the Daily Beast, between 2009 and 2012, as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry “used his access to [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu and [Palestinian President Mahmoud] Abbas to test privately what concessions the leaders would be willing to make once he secured his dream job at the State Department.” In addition to Kerry’s efforts, many analysts think the European Union’s recent decision to withhold funding and cooperation with Israeli organizations that operate in the occupied territories may have motivated the Israelis to get serious about peace talks.
  • Initial Concessions. After President Obama’s visit to Israel in which he urged Israelis to lead a grassroots movement for peace, Kerry went to work. Reports later surfaced that Kerry would revive the Arab League Peace Initiative — of which former President Clinton once called a “heck of a deal” for the Israelis — as the basis for negotiations. After the Arab League said it would ease some of the Initiative’s demands, favorable to the Israelis, Israel quietly agreed to a partial settlement freeze and said publicly this week that it would release 104 Palestinian prisoners. In return, the Palestinians, after receiving economic incentives, would promise to not seek any international recognition of their independence akin to their U.N. bid last year.
  • The Key Players. Tzipi Livni is the Israelis’ lead negotiator with the Palestinians and she will be accompanied by Netanyahu’s special envoy Isaac Molho. “On the Palestinian side,” the New York Times reports, “will be Saeb Erekat, the chief negotiator, and Mohammed Shtayyeh, a close adviser to Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority.” Kerry announced that former U.S. Ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk as his primary representative in the talks. Frank Lowenstein, who was instrumental in Kerry’s behind the scenes diplomacy with the Israelis and Palestinians in the last few years, will be Indyk’s deputy.
  • The Key Issues. As the AP notes, “The contours of Israeli-Palestinian peace are clear, experts say: If only the sides summon up the will, the inevitable outcome is two states roughly along the pre-1967 borders, with Jerusalem as a shared capital and a finessing of the Palestinian refugee issue.” The two sides must also agree to so-called “land swaps,” as its widely understood that some of the larger Jewish settlement blocs established in the occupied West Bank after the 1967 war will remain part of Israel. The Israelis have also demanded that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish State, which could complicate the right of return for Palestinian refugees, which number around 700,000. Other issues include prisoners, the demilitarization of the West Bank, what to do with Gaza, which is currently being run by the terrorist group Hamas. While the two-state solution is the ultimate goal, the New York Times reported on Tuesday that “[o]ne argument that Mr. Kerry and his team have been careful not to make publicly, but that Arab, Israeli and American officials have begun to speculate about, is that something less than a comprehensive settlement might be achievable.”
  • Potential Roadblocks. Many Israeli officials do not support peace talks with the Palestinians, or a two-state solution to the conflict, including many in Netanyahu’s own party. Israel’s deputy defense minister has even said that the Israeli government will block any two-state deal. Netanyahu has said he wants a referendum on any potential agreement, which, according to recent polling, quite possibly would pass. At the same time, there is skepticism that the Palestinian leadership has public credibility and support, perhaps leaving the legitimacy to any potential deal in question. Another issue is Hamas’s relationship with Fatah, the political party ruling the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and what effect that will have on any agreement or lack thereof.
  • After years of disappointment, Israelis, Palestinians and Americans, both on the right and left, are skeptical that this new round of talks will yield any concrete results. Addressing the skeptics, J Street president Jeremy Ben-Ami recently wrote in the New York Times, “What we need from those who recognize the importance of the secretary’s work is not a recounting of the reasons why this may not work, but their help in building what he has called the ‘great constituency for peace’ and in pressing the leaders on all sides to make it a success.”

    Tuesday, July 30, 2013

    Kremlin Sadists Are Torturing Navalny

    Kremlin Sadists Are Torturing Navalny

    Published: July 31, 2013 (Issue # 1771)

    Many are wondering why Navalny was convicted last Thursday, taken into custody and then released pending his appeal the very next day.
    Was it really the protesters who closed down Tverskaya Ulitsa that forced the authorities to do it? No, the prosecutor filed the motion for his release many hours before protests even began. Or did the U.S. White House cite the negative international reaction and pressure President Vladimir Putin into letting Navalny walk free? Of course not. Washington is far more interested in the fate of former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.
    The real reason Navalny was released was to torture him.
    The entire decision-making process in Russia is paralyzed. Putin alone makes all the major decisions, and nobody but Putin had the authority to release Navalny. Putin has always humiliated his worst enemies and rivals. And once they are properly humiliated, it is easier to remove them from the picture forever.
    Recall the proceedings against former Yukos CEO Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Throughout the first trial, the authorities hinted to him that if he would only apologize, he would receive a suspended sentence. Next, they hinted that if he admitted guilt and asked for mercy, he could possibly receive a pardon. Again, the goal was to humiliate him. Khodorkovsky refused both proposals out of principle.
    The same thing is happening with Navalny. Throughout his trial over recent months, the authorities repeatedly gave him the choice of asking for mercy. He was told that if he would only admit he was wrong, he might be pardoned — “might” being the key word here.
    “Don’t participate in the Moscow mayoral election,” Navalny was told. “Just tell everyone that you couldn’t collect the required number of signatures from municipal deputies to run for office. After all, almost all of them are from United Russia, which you consider the ‘party of crooks and thieves.’ It makes perfect sense that they would not endorse your candidacy.”
    And then comes the sadistic part of the latest twist in the Navalny affair. The victim has already felt steel handcuffs on his wrists, spent a sleepless night in the cold, damp 2-square-meter prison cell, thinking to himself that this will be his home for the next five years.
    And then, the next morning, he is yanked back from the abyss into the light of day to once again take a gulp of freedom. “What do you say now, Navalny? Still planning to criticize the authorities?”
    One current Russian multi-billionaire decided that he would never test fate or the Russian authorities after he spent a couple of nights in jail. “Never again,” he told himself. “Under no circumstances will I ever do anything again that could result in my loss of freedom.” He often tells this story. He probably told it to Putin.
    In the end, I think that Putin himself decided to imprison and then immediately release Navalny. In his distorted world in which an entire flock of Siberian cranes follows him and even U.S. President Barack Obama will wait 30 minutes to see him, such a move makes perfect sense.
    The problem is that Navalny lives in a completely different world.
    Yulia Latynina hosts a political talk show on Ekho Moskvy radio.