Brussels Terror Attack and Mossad Connection
by alethoBy Richard Silverstein | Tikun Olam | May 26, 2014
Yesterday, I broke the story
that the Rivas, an Israeli couple murdered in the Brussels Jewish
museum terror attack, worked for agencies with connections to Israeli
intelligence. Miriam worked for the Mossad and Emanuel for Nativ, a
unit that encourages aliyah from Eastern European countries (including
Russia). Thanks to reader Bluebird, who discovered that the Israeli embassy website
in Germany lists Miriam Riva as an “attache” who worked there since
2007. My Israeli source informed me that they were both accountants.
Though
I don’t know how diplomatic postings and cover works, I do wonder why
an accountant would be classified as an attache. Admittedly, you’d want
to protect anyone working for the Mossad by giving them some sort of
diplomatic protection. So it might be a pro forma status. Or it could
mean that her job as an accountant was yet another form of “cover.”
If
we parse the thinking of whoever targeted the Rivas (presuming they
were targeted, which isn’t certain), they might’ve noted their listing
on the website and also discovered Miriam worked for the Mossad. From
there, she would become a potentially high-value target. They needn’t
even have known she was only an accountant and not an agent. Or
alternatively, merely listing her name on the website as an Israeli
diplomat could’ve made her a target for an enemy who wasn’t interested
in distinguishing between Israel military-intelligence and purely
diplomatic status.
Amir Oren has also written an interesting column (Hebrew and English) in Haaretz
discussing possible motives for the attack. He speculates that the
killing of the Rivas could’ve been merely coincidental (wrong place,
wrong time). He notes that Brussels is a center of European intrigue,
filled with diplomats and politicians along with a major intelligence
presence. At the same time, it is an “Arab-European” city filled with
poor Arab residents who might serve as a refuge or operational base for
terrorists. He also declares that based on the video footage and other
factors the attack appears to have been a “professional” job rather than
a disgruntled lone gunman.
His
final suggestive theory is that like the Mossad assassination in
Lillehammer, which was based on misidentification of the victim with the
leader of Black September, the killing of the Rivas may have been based
on such a faulty judgment. Either the killers mistook them for
high-value diplomatic or intelligence targets (for example, Ephraim
Halevy had a Brussels posting before he became Mossad chief and Tzipi
Livni served in Europe as a Mossad agent), or they believed after
discovering she worked for the Mossad, that she was an agent.
Finally,
if it turns out that the the Rivas were targeted because someone
believed they were Israeli government officials or even Mossad agents,
no matter how heinous such murder is (and it is), in a sense Israel has
only itself to blame. It is the country that sends its Kidon assassins
around the world to murder Israel’s purported enemies, whether they be
Hamas operatives like Mahmoud al-Mabouh, Hezbollah leaders like Imad
Mugniyeh or Iranian nuclear scientists. In that sense, these killings
might be “blowback” from these earlier Israeli operations. I have
written this here many times before: Israel can’t expect that it will
project force so far outside its borders, killing with relative
impunity, and no one will take notice and attempt to return the favor.
... Full article
No comments:
Post a Comment