Without a Palestinian state, Israel can never be Jewish or democratic
Israel’s
policy of perpetual occupation is already causing an increase in
animosity toward the Jewish people and their state. Perpetuating this
policy fosters the beginning of an anti-Israel movement – from within
and without the state – that will be difficult to reverse.
By Stephen Robert | Dec. 30, 2014 | 10:41 PM Haaretz.
The
golden Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem's old city is seen in the distance
beyond the Israeli barrier in the West Bank city of Abu Dis, October 29
, 2014. Photo by Reuters
related articles
By Aeyal Gross | Nov. 17, 2014 | 9:58 AM | 5
By S. Daniel Abraham | Jun. 8, 2014 | 6:00 PM | 17
By Peter Beinart | Dec. 3, 2014 | 3:00 PM | 2
By S. Daniel Abraham | Oct. 19, 2014 | 3:55 PM | 13
By Rogel Alpher | Nov. 23, 2014 | 6:00 PM | 3
Casino
tycoon and right-wing political patron Sheldon Adelson has finally
spoken to the existential issue of Israeli democracy absent a
Palestinian state. Many observers were shocked by the multi billionaire,
hard-liner's recent statement proclaiming, "Israel isn’t going to be a democratic state – so what?”
While I passionately oppose Adelson's views, his remarks provided clarity by openly acknowledging that a binational Jewish state would not be a democracy, an obvious consequence largely ignored by the Israeli right wing.
While I passionately oppose Adelson's views, his remarks provided clarity by openly acknowledging that a binational Jewish state would not be a democracy, an obvious consequence largely ignored by the Israeli right wing.
Israel,
however, defines itself as a Jewish, democratic state. Its claim to
being the only democracy in the Middle East gives it the moral high
ground and engenders much foreign support, especially from Americans.
The
issue of "democracy versus apartheid" was mostly quiescent while Israel
appeared to be progressing toward a two-state solution, especially
after the Oslo Accords in 1993. That is no longer the case.
The current Israeli coalition government effectively advocates a binational state, without rights for the Palestinians. Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman,
Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon and Economy Minister Naftali Bennett, to
name a few, have publicly endorsed either one state, or a second state
the Palestinians could not possibly accept. Bennett proposes that Israel annex 60 percent of the West Bank
(Area C, which is currently under Israeli control), leaving the
Palestinians with about 9 percent of the available land prior to the
United Nations partition in 1947, whereas the United Nations awarded
Palestine 45 percent of the territory. Ya’alon favors controlling the Palestinian population – unless the Gaza Strip is demilitarized. Lieberman, for his part, has suggested forcing Israeli Arabs of the Triangle to emigrate to a Palestinian state. And Netanyahu has made it clear that he could never accept a fully sovereign Palestinian state in what is today the West Bank.
Since
Oslo, which called for a Palestinian state by 1998, peace talks have
faltered over borders, settlements, security, the division of Jerusalem
and other weighty matters. The Israeli government has removed all of the
above from the table, pivoting to one, binational state. As a result,
65 percent of the population in Israel and Palestinian Territories – including Israel within the Green Line, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank
– are citizens with full rights, while 35 percent remain under
occupation or blockade. Thus, today, we have a Jewish state, home to
about 43 percent
of the world's Jews, denying millions under its control any tenets of a
civil society, dignity, or the most basic of human rights.
This
unfathomable situation will batter the conscience of Jews and non-Jews
alike. When we teach our children that government must be by the consent
of the governed, will we say, except in Israel? How will Israeli
teachers conflate this with its Declaration of Independence, which
states that the State of Israel "will be based on freedom, justice and
peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel; it will ensure complete
equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants
irrespective of religion, race or sex"?
Those
who see Israel as a colonialist, apartheid state already besiege Jewish
students in American universities. We are witnessing the beginning of
an anti-Israel movement that will be difficult to reverse. Even when
anti-Semitism sleeps, it sleeps very lightly. Israel’s current policy of
perpetual occupation is already causing a disturbing increase in this atrocious prejudice.
Israel
is now in conflict with the most basic values of the world’s free
societies, and of Jewish tradition. Jews rightfully teach their young
about our persecution by Egyptians, Romans, Babylonians, Spanish and the
Nazis. Might these youngsters ask: Then why are we treating the
Palestinians so badly? What have we learned from our own persecution?
How can we preach our ancient values when the Jewish homeland has
abandoned them?
All
this may cause Jews to disavow their support for Israel, or even for
their religion itself. Blatant hypocrisy will not have a happy ending. Reuven Rivlin, Israel’s right-wing president, in speaking of Israeli society's horrific treatment of the Palestinians, recently commented: “I’m not asking if they’ve forgotten how to be Jews, but if they’ve forgotten how to be decent human beings."
Israel
is rapidly becoming a pariah state. The signs cannot be ignored. Part
of the intractable problem the approximately 550,000 Jewish settlers in
East Jerusalem and the West Bank, most of whom think the Bible is the
Middle East's real estate directory. Yet they form a potent voting bloc.
Fear of security is also a strong force, despite that a recent letter signed by 106 Israeli generals and spy chiefs argues that Israel has the strength and means to reach a two-state solution.
Perhaps
the biggest obstacle to peace is the corruption of power. Why should
mighty Israel give up anything? What they won in battle is theirs.
If
Israel’s leaders are determined to stand alone, they will almost
certainly stand alone. But they should remember that revolutions seem
impossible until they happen, then they are inevitable.
No comments:
Post a Comment