Omar Today
Ongoing imprisonment
Instead of granting him freedom and rehabilitation, PM Stephen Harper ensured Omar was incarcerated in a maximum-security institution on his return to Canada. The government continues to meddle in the judicial process by issuing public statements which falsely label Omar as an unrepentant terrorist.
Dennis Edney, who has defended Omar for over a decade pro bono, agrees with the Office of the Correctional Investigator that Omar should be classified at a minimum-security level and then released.Instead of granting him freedom and rehabilitation, PM Stephen Harper ensured Omar was incarcerated in a maximum-security institution on his return to Canada. The government continues to meddle in the judicial process by issuing public statements which falsely label Omar as an unrepentant terrorist.
Based on good behaviour, Omar was reclassified as medium-security and moved to Bowden Correctional Institution where he has access to some rehabilitation programs in order to earn parole. In July 2014 the Alberta Court of Appeal ruled he must be transferred to a provincial facility, but Omar remains at Bowden.
Although the Government has denied media access to interview Omar, a recent media court challenge argues a constitutional breach of the public’s right to know.
Appeal against U.S. conviction
On November 8, 2013, Pentagon lawyer Sam Morison filed an appeal in Washington to have Omar Khadr’s Guantanamo conviction overturned since all evidence indicates that Omar did not commit any crimes. In fact, Omar Khadr was himself a victim of an internationally recognized war crime: while badly wounded and lying in a prone position, Omar was shot in the back by a U.S. Special Forces soldier.
Omar’s well-being
Omar is going blind from lack of treatment in Canadian detention. The U.S. attack in 2002 had left Omar blind in in his left eye and with shrapnel lodged in his right eye. He was not provided treatment, while in U.S. detention, to save his sight. Now the vision in his right eye is rapidly deteriorating and without treatment, permanent blindness is inevitable.
With support from a team of dedicated professors from King’s
University College in Edmonton, Omar was working towards completion of
his high school diploma. Due to his eye-condition he is no longer able
to read and his studies have been put on hold. In spite of this major
setback, his teachers speak highly of his positive disposition and
academic abilities.
Strength of character
Despite the unspeakable abuse and hardship Omar has suffered, he has retained his dignity and is a positive and cheerful person who wishes to live a normal, productive life.
Despite the unspeakable abuse and hardship Omar has suffered, he has retained his dignity and is a positive and cheerful person who wishes to live a normal, productive life.
.
In one of his letters to one of his many friends
Omar wrote: “The light of goodness outshines shadows that might be.
There are too many good things in this life (as hard as it might be) to
worry or even care about the bad things. Things are what we make out of
them. Prison can be a deprivation of freedom, or a time to enlighten
ourselves. For me it is the latter.” (Dec., 2012)
.
Omar’s supporters
Among those who advocate on Omar’s behalf that his capture and imprisonment are illegal are:
- Archbishop Desmond Tutu spoke by telephone with Omar in July 2014. He said “It is unconscionable that Omar Khadr, following a travesty of a trial, where he was treated as an adult in a vicious kangaroo court, should be languishing in jail” and that “His own country Canada should be an accomplice in holding him in prison. This is an example of a horrible miscarriage of justice and that in a modern democratic state. [Omar] struck me as a very gentle and caring and courteous human being who does not belong where he is at present. The Canadian authorities would do their stature much good if they released him immediately.”
- Senator Romeo Dallaire, an outspoken advocate for Omar’s rights as a former child soldier, said in a 2012 speech to the Senate, “Honourable senators, I am rising now to put on the record the case of the only child soldier prosecuted for war crimes.… It is my intention to speak about the nightmares this man has suffered, the failures of our government to protect him, and the immediate necessity for this government to sign the transfer agreement and bring Omar back home.”
- Radhika Coomaraswamy, the UN’s Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children in Armed Conflict, has defined Omar Khadr as a child soldier in a 2010 letter to the military commission in Guantanamo and he is entitled to rehabilitation and reintegration into society, not imprisonment.
Background – Afghanistan and Guantanamo 2002 – 2012
Omar Khadr (15) shot in back by U.S. soldier
U.S. attack and war crimes
On July 27, 2002, fifteen-year-old Omar was rendered unconscious and blinded in one eye, when the U.S. Army Special Forces carried out a four hour bombardment on the compound where he was staying. When found in the rubble – unarmed and severely wounded – Omar was shot in the back by a U.S. soldier, leaving huge exit wounds in his upper left chest. “(He’s) missing a piece of his chest and I can see his heart beating”, wrote a U.S. officer in a subsequent written account of the events.
On July 27, 2002, fifteen-year-old Omar was rendered unconscious and blinded in one eye, when the U.S. Army Special Forces carried out a four hour bombardment on the compound where he was staying. When found in the rubble – unarmed and severely wounded – Omar was shot in the back by a U.S. soldier, leaving huge exit wounds in his upper left chest. “(He’s) missing a piece of his chest and I can see his heart beating”, wrote a U.S. officer in a subsequent written account of the events.
Later, a leaked Department of Defense Criminal Investigation Task Force report revealed that the U.S. military had doctored the field report to
implicate Omar in the death of a U.S. Delta Force soldier (disguised in
Afghan clothing) and erased evidence that a U.S. grenade had caused the
soldier’s death. The military not only denied that the soldier had been killed by friendly fire, but also hid information that Omar in the back at close range another survivor executed.
Illegal capture and imprisonment
After his capture by U.S. forces, Omar should have been identified as a child soldier – he was fifteen and involved in a battle in a war zone – and provided with immediate protection as guaranteed by the UN Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict. Instead, he was illegally captured, detained, and tortured in Bagram prison until October 2002. He was then transferred to Guantanamo and held there for more than a decade – often in solitary confinement – until his delayed repatriation in September 2012 to a maximum-security institution in Canada.
After his capture by U.S. forces, Omar should have been identified as a child soldier – he was fifteen and involved in a battle in a war zone – and provided with immediate protection as guaranteed by the UN Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict. Instead, he was illegally captured, detained, and tortured in Bagram prison until October 2002. He was then transferred to Guantanamo and held there for more than a decade – often in solitary confinement – until his delayed repatriation in September 2012 to a maximum-security institution in Canada.
The Canadian government’s complicity
Following Omar’s capture by U.S. military, the Canadian government had the obligation to demand that Omar be treated according to the Geneva Conventions with special regard for his age and be immediately returned to Canada. Instead, the government, first the Liberal and then the Conservative, were complicit in the illegal treatment of Omar. Although he was a Canadian child, he was denied the protection of fundamental rights provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Supreme Court of Canada and the U.S. Supreme Court have confirmed that the U.S. and Canada have violated Omar Khadr’s rights.
Following Omar’s capture by U.S. military, the Canadian government had the obligation to demand that Omar be treated according to the Geneva Conventions with special regard for his age and be immediately returned to Canada. Instead, the government, first the Liberal and then the Conservative, were complicit in the illegal treatment of Omar. Although he was a Canadian child, he was denied the protection of fundamental rights provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Supreme Court of Canada and the U.S. Supreme Court have confirmed that the U.S. and Canada have violated Omar Khadr’s rights.
The UN Committee Against Torture has called on Canada to
honour its legal obligation to ensure that Omar receives redress for
human rights violations that the Canadian Supreme Court has ruled he
experienced.
Illegitimate chargesIn 2006 the U.S. charged Omar with five ex post facto offences. Not only have the accusations against him never been proven or heard by a regularly constituted court, the charges were not offences in 2002 under U.S. law and are still not offences under Canadian or International Law. As upheld in the recent Hamdan appeal, the military court in Guantanamo (or any legitimate court) is not permitted to apply law retroactively.
Invented status
Because Omar, as a juvenile civilian, could not be charged as an enemy combatant, the U.S. rewrote the laws of war and
added the term unlawful to his status, so he would be “without combat
immunity” and therefore stripped of all legal rights. According to the
International Criminal Court he must receive the protections as either a
civilian or a prisoner of war under the Geneva Conventions.
.
The Guantanamo Military Commission was created to try Omar’s case because U.S. civilian and military courts refused to hear it. In 2008, the Federal Court of Canada revealed that the U.S. had given Canada their evidence for the case and asked if Omar Khadr could be tried in Canada. The Conservative government refused, saying, “that it was unlikely he would ever be convicted in Canada”. The Guantanamo military tribunal is neither a regularly constituted court nor a court intended to conduct fair trials. Under Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, it is an offence to impose a sentence in the absence of a determination by a regularly-constituted court.
.
Get-out-of-Guantanamo plea deal
In October 2010, Omar accepted the “get-out-of-Guantanamo plea deal” offered by his U.S. captors and pleaded guilty to the five ex post facto charges. After maintaining his innocence while enduring eight years of extreme torture, Omar understood that pleading guilty was his only way out of Guantanamo.
In October 2010, Omar accepted the “get-out-of-Guantanamo plea deal” offered by his U.S. captors and pleaded guilty to the five ex post facto charges. After maintaining his innocence while enduring eight years of extreme torture, Omar understood that pleading guilty was his only way out of Guantanamo.
.
His torture included prolonged
sleep deprivation, beatings, suspension from his wrists while his
wounds were still fresh, threats of gang rape, hooding, intimidation by
dogs, forced nakedness, body cavity searches, forced feeding,
short-shackling in stress positions, prolonged solitary confinement,
cell conditions of extreme cold and noise, constant light and
withholding of medical treatment.
.
“Confessions” extracted through torture are
not admissible in a legitimate court. Omar’s sentencing was itself a
criminal offence under Canadian (crimes against humanity and war crimes)
and International (Rome Statute) Law; the Guantanamo military tribunal proceedings cannot be considered a valid determinant of guilt.
No comments:
Post a Comment