Search This Blog

Friday, September 11, 2015

EU wants firms to pay staff from moment they leave their house

Now EU wants firms to pay staff from moment they leave their house: British companies expected to be hit by changes to rules 

  • Trade unions last night demanded workers paid for travelling time
  • Around 900,000 British workers could be affected by the judgment
  • Experts say could ruling will have ‘significant implications’ for firms that hire mobile workers
Time spent by care workers, gas fitters and salesmen travelling to customers’ homes should be counted in their working hours, an EU court ruled yesterday.
Thousands of British employers could find they are now breaking rules on how many hours their staff work following the judgment by the European Court of Justice.
Trade unions last night demanded workers without a fixed office now be paid for the time.
In the case, brought under the controversial Working Time Directive, two engineers who work for a Spanish firm installing and maintaining burglar alarms appealed over how their working hours were calculated.
Time spent by care workers, gas fitters and salesmen travelling to customers’ homes should be counted in their working hours, an EU court ruled yesterday
Time spent by care workers, gas fitters and salesmen travelling to customers’ homes should be counted in their working hours, an EU court ruled yesterday
The court in Luxembourg agreed with the men that their travelling time between home and their first and last customers of the day should be classed as working hours.
‘Excluding those journeys from working time would be contrary to the [directive’s] objective of protecting the safety and health of workers,’ the judgment said.
Under the EU health and safety rules, employees can only be required to work a maximum of 48 hours per week and are entitled to a minimum of 11 hours rest between working days.
Around 900,000 British workers could be affected by the judgment, which does not include the self-employed, who are not covered by the Working Time Directive.
Christopher Tutton, of employment law firm Irwin Mitchell, said the ruling could have ‘significant implications’ for companies that employ mobile workers.
He said: ‘Many UK companies do not consider travel time outside normal working hours as working time, but now that the ECJ has said that it should, thousands of companies may need to make changes.
‘If they don’t, employees could quickly exceed the number of working hours that they are legally allowed to work and bosses could therefore soon find that they are operating illegally and at risk of facing costly claims against them.’
Under minimum wage rules, travel time at the beginning and the end of the day is not included, but this may have to change.
Mr Tutton warned that the unions could put pressure on the Government to amend the rules. He added: ‘If employers are required to pay for this, it could dramatically increase the payroll costs of businesses who employ low paid staff.’
Dave Prentis, general secretary of trade union Unison, last night used the decision to call for home care workers to be paid for their time travelling to and from their first and last visits each shift.
Thousands of British employers could find they are now breaking rules on how many hours their staff work following the judgment by the European Court of Justice
Thousands of British employers could find they are now breaking rules on how many hours their staff work following the judgment by the European Court of Justice
‘This case rightly demonstrates that mobile workers must be paid for all their working time,’ he said.
Britain currently has a special provision under the Working Time Directive that means workers can individually opt out of the rules and therefore work more than 48 hours a week.
Earlier this week, Europe minister David Lidington said protecting this opt-out, which is permanently under review in Brussels, was a key part of David Cameron’s re-negotiation of Britain’s EU membership.
He said: ‘Our priorities are to retain the individual’s right to opt-out of the 48-hour limit in weekly working time and to address problems caused by European court judgments on on-call time, compensatory rest and holiday pay.’
British MEPs last night warned the ruling would put ‘shackles’ on employers and workers.
Anthea McIntyre, the Tory employment spokesman in the European Parliament, said: ‘This should ring alarm bells. The way travel-to-work time is dealt with should be a matter purely between employer and employee.
‘Potentially this could add significantly to the costs of businesses and interfere with long-established business practices.’
Ukip’s small business spokesman Margot Parker said: ‘Anything the EU does that adds more red tape to small business simply just holds them back. It stifles innovation and entrepreneurship and they should just simply stay out of legislation for small business.’
A British Government spokesman said last night: ‘We are carefully considering the implications of this judgment.’ 

No comments:

Post a Comment