Abe Foxman Calls on Benjamin Netanyahu To Scrap Speech to GOP Congress
ADL Chief Wants Israel Premier To End 'Circus'
GETTY IMAGES
By Nathan Guttman
Published February 06, 2015.
· PRINT
· EMAIL
·
SHARE
Related
- 2 Black Lawmakers Will Skip Benjamin Netanyahu Speech Amid Growing Storm
- Let the Bibi-Gate Blame Game Begin
WASHINGTON D.C. — As
the controversy surrounding Benjamin Netanyahu speech to Congress
reaches new heights, one of the Jewish community’s top leaders is
calling on the Israeli prime minister to stay home.
Abraham
Foxman, national director of the Anti Defamation League said that the
political uproar ignited by Netanyahu’s invitation to speak to a joint
meeting of Congress makes such a move unhelpful and therefore it should
be scrapped.
“It’s
a tragedy of unintended consequences,” Foxman told the Forward,
describing how the idea of presenting Israel’s view on Iran spiraled out
of control, reaching even the Jon Stewart show, a step, Foxman said,
that “turned the whole thing into a circus.”
“One
needs to restart, and it needs a mature adult statement that this was
not what we intended,” Foxman told the Forward. He said that going ahead
as planned with the speech would be counter-productive, with all
attention given to the political controversy rather than to the issue at
stake. “It has been hijacked by politics,” Foxman said. “Now is a time
to recalibrate, restart and find a new platform and new timing to take
away the distractions.”
Foxman
noted that he does not dispute the seriousness of the Iranian nuclear
issue and that he agrees with Netanyahu on the need to strengthen
sanctions against Tehran, but he argued that recent events have derailed
the initial intention of Netanyahu’s address to Congress.
Among
the potential alternatives mentioned by Foxman for Netanyahu’s
congressional speech were coming to Washington only for the AIPAC
conference, postponing his address until after the March 17 elections in
Israel, or expressing his concerns over the emerging Iran deal in
direct conversations.
Earlier
on Friday, the White House announced Vice President Joe Biden will not
attend the speech, because he will be travelling out of the country. The
statement did not specify Biden’s destination.
Even
before Foxman’s dramatic staetment, Netanyahu and his allies appeared
to be looking for excuses about how the speech turned into a political
disaster.
The strategy he settled on appears to be to shift the blame to Republican House Speaker John Boehner.
According
to this explanation, Netanyahu, through his ambassador to Washington
Ron Dermer, had understood that Boehner would make sure that Democrats
were on board with the idea of inviting the Israeli leader to address a
joint meeting of Congress on the problem of Iran’s nuclear development
activities. Maybe not all Democratic leadership, but at least enough to
allow all sides to say with a straight face that it was a bipartisan
invitation.
Furthermore,
Netanyahu and Dermer did not know — at least according to people who
have been in touch with Israeli officials dealing with the mess created
by the invitation — that Boehner would announce the visit the morning
after President Obama delivered his State of the Union speech. The
timing appeared designed to rebut the president’s stand on Iran, thus
infuriating the president and his fellow Democrats.
These
claims came out in the open on Friday, when Netyanyahu confidante
Tzachi Hanegbi, Israel’s deputy foreign minister and a member of the
Likud’s top leadership circle, stated in a radio interview that Boehner
had left Netanyahu in the dark as he moved ahead with the invitation.
“It
appears that the speaker of Congress made a move, in which we trusted,
but which it ultimately became clear was a one sided move and not a move
by both sides,” Hanegbi said in the interview.
Speaking
out in this manner against Boehner could be viewed as a calculated move
that could provide the prime minister with a way out of the March 3
speech. Netanyahu, so it would seem, could use this alleged
misunderstanding with Boehner as an excuse to cancel the visit.
But all signs indicate this is not the case — at least not yet.
Netanyahu
and Dermer have given no indication that retreat is an option, and
blaming Boehner for the partisan flare-up is seen mainly as a way of
appeasing Democrats and deflecting some of the criticism, not as a way
out. One Democratic staffer briefed on talks with Dermer noted that even
though the Israeli ambassador reached out to lawmakers and sought to
explain the situation, he never offered an apology nor did he express
regret over the way Netanyahu’s invitation was handled.
By
now it is clear that Netanyahu and Dermer’s efforts to assuage
Democrats’ anger have not gone well, despite endless hours spent by the
ambassador on Capitol Hill and a series of phone calls by Netanyahu to
leading lawmakers. Democrats are still furious at the Israeli prime
minister and some are considering an unofficial boycott of his speech.
And
to make things worse, here is Hanegbi again, who in what can only be
viewed as a moment of unintended candor, openly confirmed in his radio
interview what many critics have been claiming all along: that
Netanyahu’s visit is an attempt to influence the American legislative
process by convincing members to support an Iran sanctions bill opposed
by President Obama.
“The
Republicans know, as the president has already made clear, that he will
veto this legislation,” Hanegbi said. “So in order to pass legislation
that overcomes the veto, two-thirds are required in the Senate. So if
the prime minister can persuade another one or two or another three or
four, this could have weight.”
Read more: http://forward.com/

No comments:
Post a Comment