In Canada, a Death in Prison Sparks Debate, Lawsuits Over Solitary Confinement
by Aviva Stahl
Protesters
outside the headquarters of the Correctional Service of Canada in
Ottawa in January 2013. Photo: Julie Oliver/Ottawa Citizen
Ashley
Smith was just 19 when she died in her solitary confinement cell at the
Grand Valley Institution for Women in Kitchener, Ontario, in October
2007. As she had many times before, Smith tied a ligature around her
neck and tightened it. For twenty long minutes, a crowd of prison guards
stood watch from outside her door, waiting and filming as her face
turned a purplish-black. By the time they entered Smith’s cell, it was
too late to save her. Smith had spent more than 1,000 days in isolation.
Six
years later—in December, 2013—a Coroner’s Inquest determined that her
death constituted a homicide. This past December, the Canadian
government issued a formal response to the inquest, refusing to put in
place many of the jury’s 104 recommendations. This move has sparked a
national debate in Canada about the use of solitary confinement. Two
lawsuits, both filed since the government released its response, allege
that the Correctional Service’s use of isolation amounts to cruel and
unusual punishment.
Preventable Death Ruled a Homicide
Ashley
Smith’s encounters with the law and state services began when she was a
young teenager. She cycled in and out of secure youth facilities after
her first arrest at 15, for throwing crab apples at a postal worker.
Once she aged out was sent into the adult system, Smith’s life took on a
new degree of instability; she was transferred 17 times during the
course of her 11 months in federal custody in order to accommodate
“administrative issues such as cell availability and staff fatigue.
Smith also received inconsistent mental health care despite
demonstrating self-injurious behavior and voicing suicidal ideation.
After
Smith’s death, the warden and four correctional officers directly
involved in the incident were fired, and the officers were charged with
negligent homicide. The charges were subsequently dropped, however, and
all four COs were eventually reinstated to their positions. Union
representatives insisted that the COs had been scapegoated by senior
management, who had allegedly given direct orders for the guards to
ignore Smith’s behavior, and not intervene as long as she was still
breathing.
Although
Smith died of self-strangulation, a coroner’s jury later ruled the
incident a homicide, determining that she could not be held responsible
for what happened. Coroner’s inquests are formal court proceedings in
which a five-person jury hears from witnesses and determines the facts
of a death, but without establishing guilt or fault. In Ontario, where
Smith died, it is mandatory to hold a Coroner’s Inquest for all
individuals who pass away in the custody of the Correctional Service.
The jury also put forward a series of recommendations
for the Correctional Service of Canada, including stringent caps on the
amount of time individuals can spend in isolation and a complete
abolition of “indefinite solitary confinement.” Nearly a year later, in
December 2014, the Canadian government published its formal response.
They asserted “that the government is unable to fully support [the
inquest’s recommendations] without causing undue risk to the safe
management of the federal correctional system.”
The
government also refuted the inquest’s characterization of segregation
practices. “The term solitary confinement is not accurate or applicable
within the Canadian federal correctional system. Canadian law and
correctional policy allows for the use of administrative segregation for
the shortest period of time necessary, in limited circumstances, and
only when there are no reasonable, safe alternatives.”
In an interview with The Canadian Press,
one of the lawyers who represented Smith’s family lambasted the
government’s refusal to honor the inquest’s language. "They're playing
the Orwellian game…That bodes very poorly for them honestly dealing with
this crisis in the system—that they can't even call it what it is."
These
sentiments were echoed by Ashley Smith’s mother, Coralee. “I don’t see
any real changes… segregation is basically going to stay the same.”
Two Lawsuits Filed
Reactions
to the Canadian government’s position extend beyond Smith’s family and
their legal team. Since December, two separate lawsuits have been filed
by advocacy groups alleging that the use of solitary confinement in
Canada amounts to cruel and unusual punishment, and is thus
unconstitutional.

No comments:
Post a Comment