Thousands of California Prisoners, One Hunger Strike. One Week
by Sal Rodriguez
California
prisoners have been on hunger strike for one full week, today, in
protest of long-term solitary confinement. The hunger strike began on
July 8th with participation of approximately 30,000 people in two-thirds
of California's prisons, as well as several out-of-state facilities
holding California prisoners. In the first days of the hunger strike,
approximately 3,200 others also refused to attend work or education
classes as a form of protest in support of the hunger strike. Currently,
there are an estimated 4,487 still on hunger strike as of Sunday.
On Thursday, July 11th, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) put out a press release
summarizing information about the strike. Notably, unlike the strikes
of 2011, CDCR declared the strikes to be a "mass hunger strike
disturbance." The press release indicated CDCR's intention of punishing
participants in the hunger strike, saying that participants of the
strike would be subjected to disciplinary procedures and that hunger
strike leaders would be placed in Administrative Segregation Units
(Ad-Seg). Ad-Seg placement was commonly used against strike leaders in
2011, who reported being placed in cells generally smaller than their
SHU cells and were significantly barer.
As hunger strike leader Todd Ashker wrote in 2011:
We were all isolated on a tier, in strip cells with nothing but a set of clothes and fish kit – spoon, cup, bar of soap etc. – with ice cold air blasting outta the vents! The warden personally told us, “As soon as you eat, you can go back to your SHU (Security Housing Units) cells.”My “mattress” was not even a mattress. It only had lumps of padding in places and was only 50 inches long – on ice cold concrete. This was all intentional, by design. They know that when a person is subject to cold, the body requires more energy. When you’re not eating, the ice will cause your body to feed on muscle and internal organs and the brain etc. much faster. Permanent damage can happen a lot faster.
Solitary
Watch was able to confirm that identified strike leaders at California
State Prison, Corcoran, had already been placed in Ad Seg by Friday.
Further, Corcoran Public Information Officer Lt. Anthony Baer confirmed
that canteen items had been removed from the cells of participants. Lt.
Baer also explained why CDCR ordered prisons not to divulge information
as to how many individuals were striking at their facilities, saying "if
word gets out that certain prisons are not participating or the number
at a particular prison isn’t high enough – those inmates could be in
extreme danger."
This
position was also repeated by the Officer of the Receiver, which
oversees health care services in CDCR facilities. A spokesperson there
told Solitary Watch that she could not report how many hunger strikers
were being medically monitored because: "Inmates have told prison staff
that they are feeling pressured and coerced to participate. We are
concerned about the safety of inmates who are being pressured to do
this." However, she did report that the hunger strike at High Desert
State Prison, which began a week prior to the statewide strike, had
ended by Friday, and that 10 participants had been medically monitored.
Information
from Pelican Bay State Prison was more difficult to gather. PIO Lt.
Christopher Acosta repeatedly responded to questions emailed by Solitary
Watch with one line referrals to ask CDCR spokeswoman Terry Thornton
any questions about Pelican Bay.
A
sister of a hunger striker at Pelican Bay told Solitary Watch that she
had visited with her brother on Saturday. She reports that all canteen
items had been taken from strike participants' cells, that strike
leaders had been removed to Ad-Seg, and that individuals in the SHU are
being threatened with three-month extensions to their SHU term for
participation. The wife of another hunger striker also reported to
Solitary Watch that strikers were being written up for rules violations.
One
issue notably revealed by the CDCR press release is that CDCR has
halted the case-by-case reviews of all 3,000 individuals in the SHU. The
reviews began in early 2013 at all facilities holding gang validated
CDCR inmates who were subject to an indeterminate SHU term. The purpose
of the reviews was to determine whether or not individuals presently
determined to be gang members or gang associates should be retained in
the SHU, placed in the Step Down Program, or released to the general
population due to lack of evidence of gang activity.
As
the press release states, 215 of the 382 individuals reviewed have been
endorsed for release to general population. In other words, CDCR has
put on hold a review process that has revealed that CDCR gang
investigators have been placing individuals in the SHU with standards
that failed to identify security threats by their own (now-revised)
standards.
Meanwhile, the San Francisco Bay View has published letters from California State Prison-Sacramento and Calipatria State Prison,
from individuals confirming strike activity at their facilities.
Calipatria's Ad-Seg holds many individuals who are currently awaiting
transfer to a SHU, but have instead been held in ASUs due to all SHU
cells being occupied.
One letter from CSP-Sacramento, written as the strike began, reads:
"There’s only a chosen few of us Afrikan brothaz left in the struggle
on C-Facility with many tapping out from threats of losing materialistic
privileges – threats that all our property will be taken and we’ll be
placed in isolation and force fed if we continue striking."
One
mother, who requested anonymity, told Solitary Watch that she visited
her son at CCI-Tehachapi this past weekend. Her son, a hunger striker
held in the SHU at CCI, told her that correctional officers (along with
dogs) had seized all canteen items from the cells of strike
participants. Sandbags have been placed at the cell doors of strikers in
order to prevent "fishing," or note-passing. "My son says that the
sandbags prevent the air from circulating in his cell," she says.
She
also reports significantly grimmer news. "The nurse does check on them
every two days as well, and that the nurse asked if he wanted to be
resuscitated and he said yes. My son said that his neighbor, did not
want to be resuscitated because he has a life sentence and he does not
want to grow old in the SHU. My son is feeling the effect of the hunger
strike and he said they are holding out to the end."


No comments:
Post a Comment