Dick Cheney Stands by 1986 Pro-Apartheid Vote as Congressman: ‘Mandela was a Terrorist’
by Laurin Suiter
Former
Secret President Dick "Dick" Cheney recently had his miserable life
extended with a heart transplant. Once a Republican gets something, it
is 'mine, mine, mine', and with Dick, it was no different.
Asked if he spent much time thinking about the person who gave their heart so that he may live,
he brushed that query aside with characteristic lack of empathy: "It’s
my new heart, not someone else’s old heart...I don’t spend time
wondering who had it, what they’d done, what kind of person." Which
proves that it isn't whether he has an old heart or a new one that's the
problem -- it's if he has a soul. His entire political life certainly
bears this out.
In 1986, Congress was debating the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act,
which included proposed sanctions against the government of South
Africa. Dick was Wyoming's lone congressman, and as expected, opposed
the bill. Initially vetoed by President Ronald Reagan, a compromise was
hashed out by both chambers of Congress, and with bi-partisan support,
the new bill was passed with a veto-proof majority. Dick stood by his
opposition to even the softened version. For him, the President, and
other hardline conservatives, sanctions would be seen as giving in to
the demands of the African National Congress (ANC), fronted by Nelson
Mandela and deemed by the United States as a terrorist organization.
While
the Act's impact was considered minimal, it was an important gesture on
behalf of a country who had taken too long to condemn the injustices of
the apartheid regime. Within four years of its passage, Mandela would
be freed, and within another four years, become the first black
President of South Africa.
As
the world mourned the passing of President Mandela yesterday, tributes
and remembrances poured in from leaders around the world. Dick did not
offer any comments or condolences, but it is unlikely he has changed his
mind about the ANC or Mandela.
In
2000, while running for Vice-President, he appeared on "ABC News This
Week" and was asked about his 1986 vote against sanctions. He stood by
his original reasoning, explaining “The ANC was then viewed as a
terrorist organization [...] I don't have any problems at all with the
vote I cast 20 years ago." Dick feebly backpedaled a bit, stating that
Mandela was a "great man", and had "mellowed" since his release from
prison. Never mind that Dick cast the vote 14 years prior, but what is
math when you can't even count WMD's?
Senator
John Edwards, Dick's opposition for the VP slot in 2004, brought up the
'86 vote during the campaign. It was a valid point of contention, even
a decade after Mandela's ascendancy to his country's highest office.
Dick historian John Nichols spoke to Mandela personally, reporting the
following:
"(Mandela) understands that Cheney is effectively the President of the United States, one of the many reasons that he fears Dick Cheney’s power is that in the late 1980’s when even prominent Republicans like Jack Kemp and Newt Gingrich were acknowledging the crime of Apartheid, Dick Cheney maintained the lie that the ANC was a terrorist organization and a fantasy that Nelson Mandela was a terrorist leader who deserved to be in jail. Frankly it begs very powerful question. If Dick Cheney’s judgment was that bad in the late 1980’s, why would we believe that it’s gotten any better in the early 21st century?"
It
is safe to assert his acumen in the 21st century was just as poor as in
the 20th, if not worse. After an eight-year reign that included the
largest terrorist attack on American soil, waging a war in Iraq based on
trumped-up WMD allegations, the secret manipulation of energy policy to
benefit private companies, the war profiteering of his 'former' company
Halliburton, and his dismissal of runaway spending by proclaiming
"deficits don't matter," it seems history will be a lot less kinder to
him than to the esteemed Nelson Mandela. That has to stick in his
craw, which is one thing a transplant cannot replace.
Watch:
h/t: Huffington Post
No comments:
Post a Comment