Les Tuileries: The Phantom Palace of Paris
The Parisian residence of kings and emperors disappeared almost 150 years ago, but its shadow, and its ghosts, remain.
PARIS — There is an enormous void in the heart of Paris.
The
millions of visitors who walk over, around, and through the empty space
every year take little notice, and most are only dimly aware they tread
where a grand palace, home to kings and emperors, once stood. It is
just not there, after all.
But when the great Chinese-American
architect I.M. Pei was commissioned to rethink, restore, rebuild, and,
one might almost say, resurrect the Louvre Museum in the 1980s, that
nothingness became something of an obsession.
What’s missing is
the Tuileries Palace, the royal residence that once formed the western
side of the Louvre complex. Without it, the symmetry of the city, the
harmony, the feng shui, if you will, is seriously askew.
Imagine,
for a moment, that this is 1870. If you stood at the front door of the
Tuileries and looked in the general direction of the setting sun your
eye traveled straight down the main promenade through the Tuileries
Gardens, through the Place de la Concorde, where an obelisk stands like
the needle in a gun sight, and on upward along the Avenue des Champs
Élysées to the Arc de Triomphe.
Such was the Grand Axis of Paris,
the spine of a city that dearly loves its classical proportions, grand
perspectives, and carefully calculated geometry.
Goethe, alluding
to the Pythagorean roots of harmony, both aural and visual, said,
“Architecture is frozen music.” Part of the wonder of walking through
Paris is its architectural harmony, like a frozen classical symphony.
But
in this part of the city, once you took away the Tuileries Palace,
things didn’t quite line up anymore. The rest of the Louvre complex,
developed on much older foundations, is not square with the axis.
***
The history of what came to be called “The Grand Design” for the Louvre and Tuileries palaces is long and, really, very bloody.
The
Louvre itself was first built as a forbidding fortress able to block
passage up the Seine River in the 12th and 13th centuries, when French
kings were off fighting the Crusades.
It did not become a royal
residence until the reign of the great French Renaissance king, Francis
I, in the 16th century, and even then it was a dreary shadow of his
magnificent palaces at Blois, Chambord, and Fontainebleau.
In
1564, Catherine de Medici, the powerful mother of three kings, decided
to build a new palace directly to the west of the Louvre, perpendicular
to the Seine, looking across open gardens and marsh that came to be
called, after the heaven of heroes in Greek mythology, the Elysian
Fields.
Built on a site where roofing tiles, tuiles, had once been made, it was called Les Tuileries.
But, as happened so often in the building’s history, this grandiose work was interrupted by war.
Get The Beast In Your Inbox!
Daily DigestStart and finish your day with the smartest, sharpest takes from The Daily Beast
Cheat SheetA speedy, smart summary of news and must-reads from The Daily Beast and across the Web
By clicking "Subscribe," you agree to have read the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
The
ferocious religious conflicts between Catholics and Protestants raged
after the 1572 St. Bartholomew’s Day massacre which was inspired, in
part, by Catherine’s machinations.
The slaughter began in and
around the Louvre with calculated assassinations, but it spread as mobs
took to the street with gruesome enthusiasm.
“I do not know if it
is the smell of gunpowder, or the sight of blood which excites me, but,
mordi! I have a taste for slaughter,” says one of the characters hunting
around the Louvre in the Alexandre Dumas novel about those times, La
Reine Margot.
Corner of the Rue Rivoli and Rue Saint-Martin.
Wikimedia
Corner of the Rue Rivoli and Rue Saint-Martin
Henry
IV, Catherine’s ex-Protestant ex-son-in-law, eventually emerged as king
and tried to pacify Paris with building projects. He also married Marie
de Medici, another scion of the great Florentine family.
In 1610
when a Catholic fanatic murdered Henry, his son was not quite 9 years
old and Marie became regent. Among her projects, a tree-lined path
extending from the Tuileries gardens out through the fields. The axis of
western Paris began to take shape.
***
Marie’s grandson,
Louis XIV, was a restless young monarch, and his ministers hoped that
they could keep him in Paris, the nation’s capital, by turning the
Louvre and the Tuileries into a truly grand residence, a royal city
within the city.
The man they hired to do the job was the Italian
Gian Lorenzo Bernini, a painter, sculptor, architect—the designer of the
beautiful colonnades around St. Peter’s Square in the Vatican—and
arguably the most famous artist of his day. But in the end, Bernini’s
designs for the Louvre were rejected.
They were very Italian,
without visible roofs, and the interiors were rather inconvenient, with
badly placed latrines, among other problems.
Another architect,
meanwhile, took on the job of completing the Tuileries Palace. As
Alexandre Gady writes in Le Louvre et Les Tuileries: La fabrique d’un
chef d’oeuvre, “the building was now truly worthy of a king, and had
sumptuous, richly decorated apartments.”
It blocked completely the
western view of the Louvre, which was angled slightly behind. Its
central element was a high dome above a grand suspended staircase, and
from its terrace one looked out on the Tuilerie Gardens completely
redesigned by the great landscape architect André Le Nôtre, who also
planned a grand promenade extending from the center of the gardens
through stands of trees, to the base of a low hill in the middle
distance.
But Louis XIV was losing interest in the Tuileries. He
had turned his attention to a hunting lodge he decided to make the
center of his court and of France: the Palace of Versailles, and he
ruled from there for the next 44 years after spending his last night at
the Tuileries, which was also his last night in Paris, in February 1671.
Bernini,
back in Rome, sculpted a monumental statue of the Sun King on
horseback. But when it finally was delivered to Louis, after the
artist’s death, the monarch hated it. In 1685 he had it relegated it to
an obscure corner of the gardens at Versailles. Only 300 years later,
and almost in secret, would it suddenly be given new prominence.
***
By
the latter half of the 18th century, the idea that the old Louvre
should be turned into a royal museum had been floating around for
several decades. The building served as a workspace and home to several
artists favored by the court, and also several royal academies. It
hosted more or less public expositions of art, and the great figures of
the Enlightenment paid frequent visits.
The Tuileries, meanwhile,
had become again the royal residence. In 1715 Louis XV had been moved
there from Versailles when he was just five years old. (One can only
imagine the little boy-king in the enormous spaces of that elaborately
decorated palace.)
During the nearly 60 years of Louis XV’s rule,
the main promenade through the Tuileries gardens had become a broad
avenue reaching all the way to the top of the hill nearly three
kilometers away from the palace. By then, it was known as the Champs
Élysées.
The ill-fated Louis XVI and his wife, Marie Antoinette,
became king and queen in 1774, and Louis, hoping to show that he was a
man of his enlightened times, moved to make the Louvre a true royal
museum.
Then came the Revolution.
After the storming of the
Bastille in July 1789 and riots in October, Louis brought his family
from Versailles back to Paris—to the Tuileries—thinking this would put
him closer to the people whom he still hoped were his people. But for
the next three years, his presence became the object of revolutionary
fury and the Tuileries Palace was denounced as a “refuge for tyrants.”
After
the royal family’s failed attempt to escape in June 1791, they were
effectively under arrest in the Tuileries, until the palace was attacked
and invaded in August 1792, the king imprisoned, and the monarchy
abolished.
A few days later, the newly invented guillotine was set
up in the Place du Carrousel between the Tuileries and the Louvre, and a
“royal agent” named Danglémont beheaded.
The killing machine
stayed there, its blade hissing down again and again, until the show
moved out to what’s now Place de la Concorde, where more than 1,000
people, including Louis, Marie Antoinette, aristocrats and finally
revolutionaries lost their heads on that same straight line leading out
from the western entrance of the Tuileries Palace to the top of the
Champs Élysées.
Even during The Terror, classical symmetry played its role in the Parisian political theater.
When
Napoleon Bonaparte consolidated his power after the Revolution, the
Tuileries became his imperial palace, and the Louvre Museum the great
repository of the treasures he brought back to France (one might say
looted) during his conquests.
The fabulous collection of ancient
Egyptian art and artifacts, the bronze horses from Saint Mark’s in
Venice, and what seemed countless priceless objects were added to the
already stunning collection of paintings and antiquities housed in what
was quickly becoming the most magnificent collection of art in the
world.
In the Place du Carrousel, more or less where the
guillotine had been, Napoleon erected a victory arch in marble
reminiscent of those in Rome, and, once again, placed it along the
magical line that ran through the center of the Tuileries. At the other
end of the the axis, he began work on a much bigger arch, the Arc de
Triomphe, which would not be completed until 1836.
But the man who
made Paris what it is today, this city of so many wide boulevards and
grand perspectives, was not Napoleon I at the beginning of the 19th
century, it was his nephew, Louis-Napoleon, who managed to get himself
elected president in 1848, then staged a coup d’état in 1851 and in 1852
declared himself Napoleon III, the new emperor of France.
***
Under
the Second Empire, the whole of Paris became a construction site, as
buildings were demolished and wide roads cut through the city, not
least, so troops could move more easily to suppress unrest.
One of
those thoroughfares was the avenue linking the Opéra Garnier, the
center of music and dance begun under Napoleon III, with the Louvre, now
recognized in all of Europe and the world for its extraordinary
collection of art.
In the Tuileries Palace, Napoleon III and his
beautiful empress, Eugénie, would hold court side by side in the throne
room beneath a violet canopy made of velvet emblazoned with the gold
seal of the empire. But even in the imperial abodes, construction was
under way, as the emperor’s architects worked to join the museum more
closely to the palace.
The imperial “small apartments,” some of
which are reproduced in the modern Louvre, were decorated in an
over-the-top opulent style known as neo-Louis XV, with carved wood, and
masses of gilt. Paintings were everywhere, including the ceilings, and
enormous chandeliers showered the rooms with candlelight flickering
through cut crystal.
Napoleon III was, for a time, the most
powerful man in Europe, but, like many a dictator, he misjudged his own
strength. In the 1860s (with the United States weakened by its Civil
War) he launched an invasion of Mexico and tried to create a subsidiary
empire there under a hapless Hapsburg prince. In Europe, he waded into
the wars of Italy, and fatally misjudged the rising power of the
Prussians.
The Germans defeated Napoleon III on the battlefield,
imprisoned him, and eventually sent him into exile in England. They laid
siege to Paris, shelling the city until it surrendered and stationing a
garrison there. The empire had collapsed, a new republic was declared.
The
workers of Paris rose up to form their own government, The Commune,
until the remnants of the national army regrouped at Versailles, and
marched into the city on May 21, 1871, routing, and in many cases
summarily executing, the communards in what became known as The Bloody
Week.
On the night of May 23, a typesetter and former soldier who
had risen to lead some of the Commune’s forces, Jules Bergeret, went
room to room in the Tuileries with a pair of accomplices drenching the
rich furnishings with kerosene, systematically setting the building
alight.
Soon the blaze turned the Paris sky red and the
200-year-old building looked like an enormous grate full of burning
embers. The dome over the center collapsed into the monumental stairway,
and the flames began to spread toward the Louvre.
***
Today,
if you walk down from the iconic Winged Victory through the Louvre’s
Daru Gallery, you will pass two marble plaques, poorly lit, that attract
virtually no attention.
One is devoted to Henri Barbet de Jouy,
the curator of the Louvre in 1871, and members of his staff, who stayed
in the building throughout the shelling of Paris by the Prussians and
the revolutionary chaos of the Commune, doing their best to protect its
treasures from thieves and from the mob, and largely succeeding.
But
on that morning of May 24, as the Tuileries fire roared toward the
grand galleries of the Louvre and a battle raged outside, where
communards had blocked the quay along the Seine, Barbet de Jouy
despaired.
There was only one source of water near the wooden
bridge that linked the Louvre to the Tuileries inferno, and there was no
way to stop the flames, he thought.
The second plaque in the
museum, next to Barbet de Jouy’s, is dedicated to Martian de Bernardy de
Sigoyer, commander of the 26th light infantry battalion of the regular
French army. When his troops had deployed in the Tuileries Gardens, the
palace already was in flames.
He saw the danger to the national heritage, and indeed to the world heritage, if the fire spread.
Going
against standing orders, he had his men attack the first communard
barricade with bayonets and broke through. While some of his troops took
positions in the museum windows, covering the quay down below, others
mounted to the roof, hacking away at the wooden bridge that joined the
museum and the burning palace, and forming a bucket brigade to douse
such flames as broke through.
Thus, as the plaque reads, by
Bernady de Sigoyer’s “energetic initiative were saved the palace and the
national collections of the Louvre.”
Two days later, the heroic
officer’s bullet-riddled body, stripped of weapons and boots, was found
about four kilometers from the museum, near the Place des Vosges in the
Marais. The circumstances of his death never were elucidated. As for
Jules Bergeret, the man who torched the Tuileries, he fled to England,
then to New York City, where he was naturalized an American citizen,
worked as a house painter, and died in 1905, apparently of natural
causes.
The ruins of the Tuileries, charred and crumbling stone,
remained in place for more than 20 years before, finally, in 1883 they
were torn down.
***
A century later, the architect I.M. Pei
and his associates were well aware of all this dramatic history, and
also of the fact that then-President François Mitterrand had made their
work the centerpiece of an even bigger project that would extend the
“Grand Axis” far beyond its old limit to reach an enormous square-shaped
Grande Arche in the architectural ghetto to which the city relegated
most of its skyscrapers, La Défense.
When the main courtyard of
the Louvre, the Cour Napoléon, was a parking lot for bureaucrats in the
finance ministry, which used to occupy the north wing, the discordant
angle of the old building was not so striking.
But Pei’s solution
for a spectacular entrance to receive millions of visitors was a glass
pyramid squarely placed in the middle of the courtyard.
And,
inevitably, one’s eye, one’s sense of symmetry, one’s innate feng shui,
wanted that pyramid to be the end point of the immortal axis. But there
was no way to make that happen.
“The Tuileries had been the end point,” said Yann Weymouth, who was the supervising architect for the project at the time.
So
there was no anchor, no closure, if you will, and “that bothered us,”
he told me over the phone from St. Petersburg, Florida, where he is
designing new museums. “As you came down into the Cour Napoléon through
the small Carrousel Arch, it didn’t focus on anything.”
As
Weymouth recalls, I.M. Pei and Michel Laclotte, the director of the
Louvre at the time, “talked a lot about what we could put there.”
Laclotte
thought of the Bernini statue of Louis XIV out at Versailles, and a
sort of jest, indeed, a beau geste, started to take shape.
Pei had
been worried all along that his plans for the Grand Design might meet
the same fate as Bernini’s did more than 300 years before: a summary
rejection after a huge amount of work. (One notes there are many
bathrooms in Pei’s Louvre.) And French critics had been quick to
excoriate the proposal for the glass pyramid.
So, with very little
fanfare, the equestrian statue was reproduced in cast lead around what
Weymouth describes as “a gorgeous stainless steel armature” and put in
place in the southwest quadrant of the courtyard.
Today it is hard to imagine the Louvre without Pei’s gorgeous pyramid.
But
many of the tourists who sit on the oddly angled base of the Bernini
statue to pull sandwiches out of their backpacks, or just catch their
breaths, never bother to look up.
I go there every chance I get.
It offers, I think, one of the most spectacular and historically fraught
perspectives in the world. One sees, as if through a surveyor’s
transit, the monuments and boulevards along the axis all the way to La
Défense.
One also sees what is no longer there: the courtiers
trysting in the gardens; the guillotines of The Terror; and the
Tuileries Palace.
Sunday, March 13, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment