Opponents
of the ordinance insisted that conservative Christians are the real victims.
“Christian businessmen all over the country are being sued for not participating
in gay weddings,” wrote Calvin Morrow, head of Christians United for Political
Action,, the group behind the repeal. “To serve those types of celebrations
violates their consciences … Do we suspend free speech for Christians and use
police powers to force compliance?”
How
this translates into the right to throw people out of work and out of their
homes is unclear. Morrow did not provide the Biblical verse that supports
that argument.
The
campaign against the ordinance depended heavily on fear, and in particular fear
of transgender people. The specter of having to share a bathroom with a
transgender person apparently left a majority of voters with their Depends in a
knot.
“It
gives anyone claiming to be transgender the right to choose which public locker
room, dressing room, bathroom, or other previously gender specific area they
wish to use,” proponents of the measure argued. The
anti-ordinance people insisted that they were referring to heterosexual
predators pretending to be transgender, and we all know how common a phenomenon
that is.
The
only positive sign was that the measure passed with such a slim margin: just 51%
of the vote. It’s a sign of how much the times have changed that an anti-gay
measure in a city where the ultra-conservative (and predictably anti-gay) Assemblies of
God is
headquartered. That the religious right can’t turn out a landslide
there is a sign of how weak their side has become in the culture war they want
to keep fighting.

No comments:
Post a Comment