Search This Blog

Friday, June 21, 2013

Christian legal group says gay rights assignment was religious intolerance

Christian legal group says gay rights assignment was religious intolerance

Thursday, June 20, 2013
 
CLIFTON, Tenn. — Officials at Columbia State Community College say they’re investigating claims by a Christian legal group that a psychology professor’s assignment about gay rights is teaching her students religious intolerance.
The controversy stems from an assignment given to students this year by Linda Brunton, in which they were allegedly directed to wear a rainbow ribbon and make statements in support of gay rights. They were then instructed to write a paper detailing any discrimination they faced for their perceived support or orientation.
The Tennessean
A church sign across the street from Columbia State Community College displays a scornful response to a psychology professor’s assignment.
Travis Christopher Barham, an attorney for the Arizona-based Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), said his group received complaints from Christian students who objected to the assignment.
In a letter to the college, Barham alleged that Brunton’s assignment violated principals of the First Amendment.
“This assignment posed serious problems for students who did not wish to convey this message and particularly those – like those who contacted us – whose religious convictions prohibit them from supporting conduct their faith teaches is unnatural and immoral,” Barham wrote.
“Dr. Brunton’s assignment violates decades (of) clearly established law by compelling students to support in public views they either do not wish to advocate or find abhorrent,” Barham wrote.
Barham’s letter demands an apology, and alleged that Brunton told students that anyone who opposes gay rights are “uneducated bigots.”
While Brunton declined comment, Chris Sanders of the Tennessee Equality Project, a friend of the professor, said the lawyer’s claims are untrue.
According to Sanders, that assignment was voluntary and has been previously commonly used in psychology classes.
“It’s designed to help students gain empathy for gays and lesbians,” according to the teaching guide for the assignment, titled “Promoting Increased Understanding of Sexual Diversity through Experience Learning.”

The guide advises that the assignment should be voluntary. “Students were allowed to opt out, and some did,” Sanders said. “And students were told that if they felt uncomfortable, they could take off the ribbons.”
David Hacker, a spokesman for the ADF, acknowledged that teaching students to have empathy or to understand opposing views is allowed, as long as it’s in the classroom setting. Students can’t be required to wear the ribbons outside the class, he said.
Hacker would not identify the students who complained about Brunton, or say how many there were. He also did not know if the organization had documents showing whether the assignment was required.
The incident has stirred controversy in the local community. Greg Gwin, pastor at Collegevue Church of Christ, located across the street from the college, said he is “increasingly disgusted by the intolerance of those who claim to promote tolerance.”
On Wednesday, Gwin had the church sign altered to read: “CSCC: God is not an ‘Uneducated Bigot’ Rom 1:26.27.”

1 comment:

  1. "God is not an ‘Uneducated Bigot"

    You know what?

    When and if we are to believe the book we know as the bible and that book to be having the words of god.... I indeed do believe those words: "God is not an ‘Uneducated Bigot"

    No, if we assume the bible being right, god is indeed not an uneducated bigot... his followers are!

    The ones who claim to be speaking the word of god are the bigots, the ones who claim to be representing god are the bigots, and the ones who claim to be the keyholders of heaven are the bigotd!

    In the book bible god speaks of love, speaks of compassion, speaks of care and of inclusion....... while those that claim to be speaking on his behalf, or in his name are speaking the opposite!

    They speak of, and practice exclusion, hate, and non-compassion!

    But then, as we do not know if there is a god, and all we know about god is coming from a book that was written by human beings, by monks, in a language long ago being used only by those who could read and write and the common people were not even able to make the distinction between a yes or no when seeing it, we can clearly assume that what some believe to be true is in fact a matter of simply that... believing!

    A faith is believing that something is true, were facts are non-present, and were that what is claimed can not be proven or presented with anything collaborating with it!

    It were, and still are human beings that claim to be talking in gods name, on his behalf, and as we also all know.... human beings are subject to failure and failings.......... (were the bible states that god said even that....... that humans are subject to failings and failure) and thus we are subject to possible failing human beings telling us that the bible is the word of god.........

    How could they ever know?

    No one ever returned from the dead, no one ever was able to state who and what after death, and no over ever was proven to be living on after having died......... although we all hope that our loved ones live on...

    They do, in our hearts, our minds and in ourselves!

    ReplyDelete