Peter Snyder at 6:22 AM ET
I am constrained by the law of the circuit to concur in the judgment of the court. The majority opinion is unassailable in holding that our precedent (which conflates the preponderance of the evidence and substantial evidence standards) supports the result reached. I have no authority to stray from precedent. However, when I review a record like the one presented in this case, I am disquieted by our jurisprudence. I think we have strained to make sense of the applicable law, apply the applicable standards of review, and adhere to the commands of the Supreme Court. The time has come for the President and Congress to give serious consideration to a different approach for the handling of the Guantanamo detainee cases.Edwards also voiced the opinion that the court was setting bad precedent potentially allowing the government to detain "any young, Muslim man" who is traveling through or residing in an area where there is a terrorist presence. Earlier this week the US government released [JURIST report] the names and nationalities of 46 men who are classified for "continued detention" at Guantanamo Bay, ineligible for release, transfer or prosecution. Also this week President Barack Obama [official website] appointed [JURIST report] Clifford Sloan to be the new envoy in charge of closing Guantanamo Bay. The Pentagon Prosecutor at Guantanamo announced that only seven more captives are expected to be charged [Miami Herald report] at Guantanamo. Last week the US Department of Defense [official website] announced that military commission charges [JURIST report] were filed against Iraqi prisoner And al-Hadi al-Iraqi for allegedly commanding al Qaeda. Earlier in June the House Armed Services Committee approved [JURIST report] the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) [HR 1960, PDF], which would keep the detention center at Guantanamo Bay open.
No comments:
Post a Comment